![]() |
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Thanks guys, appreciate all the positive feedback.
Thinking I need 285/75/16 meats on there. The tires on it are about 10 years old and 1/4 of full tread left |
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
1 Attachment(s)
Or 255/85/16 tires. What size wheels are you planning?
As an example Toyo suggests 6.5-7.0-8.0 for the 255 and 7.5-8.0-9.0 for the 285 with both tires being right at 33.2-3" in the M55 series. |
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Hi Tim,
i'm running 7" rims and agree with the guys here that 70 series and up are ok on that rim with a 285 and narrower tire. Going to price out those toyos though. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=582186 |
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Found them looking for C30 tires that would live at maxc. GVW. They are commercial all season tires. The 285s are E rated at 3700lb and the 255s are also E at 3400lb. Expect to pay about $300 a corner IIRC.
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Jud, how's the truck treating you?
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Quote:
A few weeks back I swapped a different rear hatch on the topper and put on an ochre tailgate. new lift cylinders on hatch too. Havent driven it much at all since it had driveability issues. 1). it pulled hard when braking. That sealed the deal that i might as well rebuild the front axle that I never got around to before. I figured as long as the hubs are coming off, it getting new dust shields, bearings, rotors, calipers, caliper mounting plates, ball joints, tie rods, seals, lugs, everything but gears and bearings on the carrier. issue 2). is it stumbles alot accelerating. I checked the timing and found the vaccuum advance isnt working. Theres a new distributor sitting here waiting for me to install. |
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
I hate to say it, but right now is a perfect oppurtunity to ditch that gasser and small D44. You have the donor pieces on hand, right? :lol:
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Quote:
And if those wer'nt big enough hints, the Sm465 trans sticks going into second gear... I've got a getrag/205/gearvendors sitting here with the 12V and D60....... If the Dana 60 didn't need rotors and seals, or was 4.10, I'd swap it in. Also, I keep thinking the frame on the K20 needs to be beefed up first or I should just find a C30 or longhorn! |
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Quote:
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
4 Attachment(s)
While on the topic, I did pick up some more "parts" a few weeks ago. '93 with Spun bearing in engine, body has rust, but chassis is solid and this truck was maintained and has overdrive A518 so thinking maybe I will fix and use this as a winter tow rig, then in 5 years when I'm on my second 12v conversion, harvest these parts.
Trying to figure out if I want to swap in the other 12V from the '90 white truck or try to stab in new bearings with the engine still in the truck??? |
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Below is the '90 getrag, 5spd donor, 3.54 D60 totally shot body and chassis is rusty too. I'm running it now with a D60 rear I rigged up for it. Wouldn't mind trading one of my 3.54 Dana 60's for a 4.10 one. |
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Jud, chances are if it spun a bearing, the crank will need polishied and the rod could need resized. It might be easier to swap engines for now and rebuild this one for your next project.
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Quote:
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Quote:
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Very nice ochre build.
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
2 Attachment(s)
Overdue for an update. Needed brakes and I figured as long as the hubs are coming off, it getting new dust shields, bearings, rotors, calipers, caliper mounting plates, ball joints, tie rods, seals, lugs, everything but gears and bearings on the carrier since that seems good, fluid was good, and it only spins a fraction of the time anyways. Lots of PART$
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
It's gonna drive like new
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
its a good feeling to get the front back in good order. driving something that is nice and tight in the front makes a big difference in your attitude towards the vehicle.
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Hard to believe how quick all those new parts add up. I did the front suspension rebuild on my C10 this winter and without the brakes spent a few hundred. And that was after bargain shopping for a while. There won't be much left to overhaul on this truck soon. Great job as always.
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
With a proper front end, it will be interesting to see how good/bad the stock steering box is. My only real experience with a roadworthy K20 was with an upgraded AGR variable ratio box. |
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Nice looking pile of parts. It's never ending it seems. :lol:
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Pics of front end when i was working on it.
working on distributor replacement now. vacuum advance wasnt working at all. Hope that solves the chugging while accelerating. |
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
2 Attachment(s)
Pic for above post plus one of a test fit on 32' trailer. Plenty of room, a 30' would work :)
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Making a trip soon Jud? :lol:
|
Re: 1971 K20- project just get driveable!!
Ryan, no trips with it this month unless i get time to part a couple trucks and make time for a scrap run. I was either faced with replacing the axles on the tandem with heavier ones but the price was getting up to 1600 just for axles with brakes and hubs so i thought it may make sense to get another trailer, then i saw this older but well maintained 2 place for about the same price and couldnt pass it up. Now i really need to get that diesel going or do the cam/tune/headers on the lq4 :) At least the unloaded weight is fairly low on this one, and its pretty low so drag will be less. Feels about the same weight as my tandem empty (3600), maybe a tad lighter.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com