![]() |
Re: Cold air inlet
Quote:
It makes total sense. |
Re: Cold air inlet
I disagree with nearly everything in that giant post. I would advise anyone reading it to do A LOT more research before taking that post for fact. It's a mishmash of concepts not being correctly applied to what actually happens in the real world. It is NOT scientific at all even though lots of scientific terms are thrown around. Reader beware.
|
Re: Cold air inlet
Not to start any debates, but interesting/educational subject matter here. Snailed id like to hear more than just you disagree, about the subject.
|
Re: Cold air inlet
Quote:
master degreed engineer here, worked in lumped capacitance for environmental control systems in aerospace. but I say that not to give absolute creedence, only to tell you I do know the scientific terms and their applications. I agree to do your own research, my other engineer friends debated this pretty lively and we figured the gain at 100 degrees difference in inlet temp was something less than 1%, multiplied by the efficiency of the gasoline engine of course, which is around 65%, so 0.65% gain, thats almost 2 hp on a 300hp engine! |
Re: Cold air inlet
Damn Joe... ya just killed like three of my ideas in one post. LOL! All kidding aside though, thanks for that explanation (in terms I can understand) Especially the capacitance part. Looks like I'm scrapping the cold air intake idea for a intercooled turbo 396! HAHA
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Cold air inlet
I was thinking it wouldn't be too difficult to channel to the carburetor the air that enters these two large openings.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a...1&d=1323661400 Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Cold air inlet
Quote:
|
Re: Cold air inlet
The funny thing is his original post made sense too.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Cold air inlet
FYI, JUST TO SAY THIS IS A GOOD CONCEPT AND IT DOES WORK. WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON BESIDES THE COOLER AIR IS THAT AT THE BASE OF THE WINDSHIELD THERE IS A HIGH PRESSURE AREA THAT DEVELOPS AS SPEED INCREASES. WHEN A AIR INTAKE IS ADDED TO THIS AREA (A 1989 FREIGHTLINER FLD12064ST OVER THE ROAD TRACTOR ) USED THIS PRINCIPLE TO REMOVE EXTERNAL AIR CLEANERS FOR THE TRUCKS AND THEN USED THE HIGH PRESSURE AIR TO HELP CLEAN UP THE AIR FLOW AND PROVIDE AIR TO THE ENGINE. SO THIS DOES 3 THINGS, PROVIDES MORE AIR TO THE INTAKE, PROVIDES COOLER AIR TO THE INTAKE, AND HELPS REDUCE THE TURBULANCE OF THE AIR AROUND THE TRUCK. GOOD IDEA.
KIETH :uhmk: :gmc2: |
Re: Cold air inlet
GM probably used the same type of wind tunnel research before they designed the cowl induction hood on the chevelles, if you will note the intake is at the back of the hood to take advantage of the high pressue area in front of the windshield. JMO Kieth
|
Re: Cold air inlet
The part I keep trying to figure out with these exterior scoops and cowls, is how do you keep the rain water out?
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Cold air inlet
I was waiting for that to come up---------
|
Re: Cold air inlet
Particle separators, the air can change directions faster than dust or rain, so an aero device is put in the airstream that collects the particles and does not restrict airflow (much). Turboprop aircraft engines use two, one for rain and particulate, and another that can be opened when in ice.
You can see the air dam and drain tubes on a cowl induction chevelle Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Cold air inlet
in a recent classic trucks issue they had an article on running a cold air intake through the inside headlight holes through the inner fender and over to the carb.
|
Re: Cold air inlet
Quote:
|
Re: Cold air inlet
Here's another idea.
Found it in another thread. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a...1&d=1279980647 |
Re: Cold air inlet
|
Re: Cold air inlet
Quote:
Makes good sense. |
Re: Cold air inlet
If one takes the ambient air in without disrupting the stock inlet one can (usually) see a benefit. I had an '05 Toyota Corolla that I added a cold air intake to. It took air in through the hole where a driving light would be. The original inlet for the duct to the filter box was between the battery and the radiator. Kind of a dead space, and possibly the hottest place under the hood. I ran 2" ABS with a "Y" pipe that takes 3 inputs and has one output, sort of like a "scoop". The stock setup was in place, but cooler air could push out of there when the ram air effect overcame its input. There is a circular part of the duct to the air filter box that was accessible from the bottom; that's where I fed the cold air in. I gained about 1% in mileage, and it cost me about $13 in parts. 1% doesn't look like a lot, but I put 220k+ miles on it. That's 2.2k miles less fuel; at $3 a gallon and 35 MPG, that's 63 gallons, for a savings of $189. It did have a bit better performance, especially on really hot days. Nothing to write home about, though.
Buick had a set-up in '68 that was OTC at the dealership. It fed in from a hole in the firewall into the back of the air cleaner, so it didn't block the snorkel. It was verified to give ~ .1 second reduction in 1/4 mile ET by several users. I wouldn't mind doing that on my truck, except for the secondary roar. It would be louder than the exhaust! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com