The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   projects and builds (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=197)
-   -   Project Vitamin C-10 (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=248460)

jgh64pkup 04-24-2009 12:16 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
they only make 1 standard (non select) oil pump and thats a m55 the high volume is a m55hv. when i worked at parts plus that is the pump we sold for all sb chevys
you shouldnt need a high volume
BTW did you have any cam clearance issues

Chevysdominate 04-24-2009 12:56 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan's Classic (Post 3273392)
Thanks for the input on lifters. My cousin called me back plus I got some help from the engine forum to reinforce what my cousin said. I over tightened the lifters by about a round and waited for the oil to bled out of it. That was the problem they were full of oil. It was simple but confused me :lol:

I found out my cousin has a 68 camaro with a 540 Kieth Black engine. He's coming to the next cruise in. I want a ride.:metal: I will get pics.

Also found out today that the federal government had the oil makers remove certain components like zinc. Because the stuff was plugging catylitic converters. That has resulted in alot of flat tappet cams failing. I've heard it from 3 different people in the past few days (2 engine builders). My cousin runs rotella diesel oil. It still has the ingredients in it. Has anyone else heard of this? Or you could ad this for about $12 a bottle. One engine builder uses it, I think I would use rotella

Got my oil pump and pan on tonight.

All the big automakers have internal service bulletins warning against using new oils in flat tappet camshaft engines (I've seen the GM bulletin with my own two eyes). I had to rebuild my 400 two different times because of a flattened cam. The third revision of the engine is still alive and kicking strong after i used an additive given to me by a gm mechanic. You don't need to use additives all the time, but you should use it for the first couple hundred/thousand miles. With all that being said, I have seen a fair number of engines do just fine with no additives at all. I personally wouldn't risk it though:)

Captainfab 04-24-2009 10:58 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
The absense of zinc in most motor oils, including diesel specific oils, has been discussed several times over in the Engine and Drivetrain section. Personally I wouldn't risk a flat tappet failure and use the additive all the time. It would be cheaper than a rebuild.

That oil pump issue has me stumped.....never seen that. As jgh64pkup said all SBC oil pumps are interchangeable regardless of the crank. The only thing I can think of related to the oil pump that would need to be different is the intermediate shaft between the distributor and the pump needs to be correct for the 3.75 stroke crank. Is that an aftermarket crank Alan? Is the interference a large amount or could a little grinding on the oil pump take care of it. Yeah I know that shouldn't have to be done. Can you get a hold of another pump to check to see if it is just an oddball pump?

Captainfab 04-24-2009 11:09 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Missed my edit window.....I see you have the correct intermediate shaft. It
could possibly be the pump being the M55A as jgh64pkup also mentioned. I've always used either a M55 or M55HV pump.

jgh64pkup 04-24-2009 11:49 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
go down to your local parts store get a melling m55 (usually cost around 20 bucks) and slap it on there i bet it will fix your problem

Alan's Classic 04-24-2009 11:57 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daverod (Post 3275657)
If I knew anything about anything I would offer advice, but I don't. So I'll just sit here and watch. Good luck I know you'll get it figured out. Can't wait to start on my engine.:metal:

Thanks, and yes it did get figured out today. Read on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jgh64pkup (Post 3275919)
they only make 1 standard (non select) oil pump and thats a m55 the high volume is a m55hv. when i worked at parts plus that is the pump we sold for all sb chevys
you shouldnt need a high volume
BTW did you have any cam clearance issues

I'll try to condense everything down today into a short story. I ordered the M55A pump from Skip White. They said it fits all small blocks. I called Melling and emailed the pic to him and he said "Wow". He looked into it and emailed me back saying my crank is out of spec. I went to the local parts house and got a M55 and it looks and fits great with no interferrance. I called Skip White and he said He has seen this before with certain cranks with this pump. I can't tell what crank this is. I bought a 383 kit and can't locate the paper work. He said just send the pump back. So that issue is resolved, now I just need to clean everything back up and start over.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chevysdominate (Post 3275973)
All the big automakers have internal service bulletins warning against using new oils in flat tappet camshaft engines (I've seen the GM bulletin with my own two eyes). I had to rebuild my 400 two different times because of a flattened cam. The third revision of the engine is still alive and kicking strong after i used an additive given to me by a gm mechanic. You don't need to use additives all the time, but you should use it for the first couple hundred/thousand miles. With all that being said, I have seen a fair number of engines do just fine with no additives at all. I personally wouldn't risk it though:)

I will run the additive all of the time. It's just not worth the risk. Thanks for the input.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captainfab (Post 3276834)
The absense of zinc in most motor oils, including diesel specific oils, has been discussed several times over in the Engine and Drivetrain section. Personally I wouldn't risk a flat tappet failure and use the additive all the time. It would be cheaper than a rebuild.

Thanks captain, I don't venture away from the 60-66 section that much unless there's not much going on in it. I just don't have the time right now. I would love too read everything this forum has too offer. Maybe someday I will have some time.;)

http://i369.photobucket.com/albums/o...e/DSC09325.jpg

Strodder 04-25-2009 10:07 AM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Weird stuff, I'm glad you got it figured out. The latest problem I had with this 59 Ford Panel I'm working on. The customer gave me a 302 engine with a C-6 tranny to install. First problem was the 302 had the wrong flywheel. It was too small and the starter wouldn't mesh with the ring gear. I had to research, and buy the correct flex plate. I installed the new flex plate and put the trans back on the engine. Then when I went to bolt up the torque converter it didn't fit. The guy said it was a special made converter for the C-6 transmission, and his 302 engine with an RV cam. I took the transmission & flex plate off again, and brought both the converter, and flex plate down to the local Transmission Shop. He said the torque converter wasn't even for a C-6 or a C-4. It was for an early Mustang. My customer got screwed. He bought this converter for $500.00 years ago, and the guy he bought it from died, and went out of business. What I hate is I'm stuck with the problem, and the customer wants me to feel sorry for him. I spent all this time for no money. Good thing I found it out before I installed the engine and trans in the truck. Now I have to get a new converter. You bet I'll make money on it. F**ken FORDS!! Sorry for ranting on. :waah:

daverod 04-25-2009 01:31 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Nicely put and I hear ya. Damn people anyways.

64Fugly 04-26-2009 09:44 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hey Alan, Heck of a job your are doing there, I am so very jeleous that I had to convince my fiance to let me get my 65 out of storage put new tags on it and park it in the garage to start working on it. I got the deed done. It just cost me updating one of the rooms. new walls, new floor, etc......

Attachment 456614

Alan's Classic 04-26-2009 10:16 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Strodder (Post 3277283)
Weird stuff, I'm glad you got it figured out. The latest problem I had with this 59 Ford Panel I'm working on. The customer gave me a 302 engine with a C-6 tranny to install. First problem was the 302 had the wrong flywheel. It was too small and the starter wouldn't mesh with the ring gear. I had to research, and buy the correct flex plate. I installed the new flex plate and put the trans back on the engine. Then when I went to bolt up the torque converter it didn't fit. The guy said it was a special made converter for the C-6 transmission, and his 302 engine with an RV cam. I took the transmission & flex plate off again, and brought both the converter, and flex plate down to the local Transmission Shop. He said the torque converter wasn't even for a C-6 or a C-4. It was for an early Mustang. My customer got screwed. He bought this converter for $500.00 years ago, and the guy he bought it from died, and went out of business. What I hate is I'm stuck with the problem, and the customer wants me to feel sorry for him. I spent all this time for no money. Good thing I found it out before I installed the engine and trans in the truck. Now I have to get a new converter. You bet I'll make money on it. F**ken FORDS!! Sorry for ranting on. :waah:

Rant on Brother get it all out. :lol: I dread those days. I have only done mainly collision repairs for family members. I did do the Miata for someone a little while back. All I had to do was the paint and body work. If I ever get my truck done I will be in the market to do someone elses restoration. I was thinking it would be up too them to locate and pickup all parts for their restoration. Unless they want to pay me by the hour to do so.:lol: I know how much time I spend locating parts for my project.

Quote:

Originally Posted by daverod (Post 3277469)
Nicely put and I hear ya. Damn people anyways.

:chevy:

Quote:

Originally Posted by 64Fugly (Post 3279425)
Hey Alan, Heck of a job your are doing there, I am so very jeleous that I had to convince my fiance to let me get my 65 out of storage put new tags on it and park it in the garage to start working on it. I got the deed done. It just cost me updating one of the rooms. new walls, new floor, etc......

Thanks Fugly, Congrats on digging it out of storage. Make sure too take lots of pix and show us what your doing. I hear ya about updating the house. Read on......

Things are kind of slow in the shop due too getting the walkway done from the house too the shop. No more walking thru mud and hearing about it later. ;)

http://i369.photobucket.com/albums/o...p/DSC09327.jpg

Now the time has come to get the kitchen cabinets done. If ya'll don't remember she wants them painted black. Did some experimenting with spraying oil base paint thru my automotive gun. It makes the job a little easier. But it is going to take some time to get it all done. We have to roll the base cabinets with a foam roller, because it's too much trouble to remove. Here are the first doors that got painted.

http://i369.photobucket.com/albums/o...p/DSC09343.jpg

In between all of that I got the engine lower end buttoned up and painted. Still have to adjust the valves and install intake.

http://i369.photobucket.com/albums/o...e/DSC09356.jpg

shortbed70 04-26-2009 10:22 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
I'm gettin ready to do the walkway myself especially after today with 2.5" of rain or more.....

Strodder 04-26-2009 11:23 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
I charge $40.00 pr hr, and here in So Cal that's cheap. But I'm a sucker. I still charge them what I thing it should be worth, even though I spend a lot of time on it. Like today I took apart a pedal cluster, then wire wheeled it. Then I sand blasted it, primered it, and painted all the parts. Then put it all back together. What should I charge for that. It took me 4 hours. Should I charge the cheap bastard $160.00 for it? It doesn't sound right. I think around $50.00 would be fare. I loose!! And to top all that he will probably think that it's too much. At least I have work during these bad times.
Walk way looks nice Allan. I did the same thing with paving bricks. The wify was complaining about the dirt in the house. :lol: I also got side tracked by planting some fruit trees. :waah::lol::lol:

jgh64pkup 04-26-2009 11:26 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
glad you got the oil pump figured out
what type of tranny and rear gear are you goin with

70 Suburban 04-27-2009 01:22 AM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
I dont remember did u weld up the seams in your hood.

Alan's Classic 04-27-2009 12:17 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Strodder (Post 3279672)
I charge $40.00 pr hr, and here in So Cal that's cheap. But I'm a sucker. I still charge them what I thing it should be worth, even though I spend a lot of time on it. Like today I took apart a pedal cluster, then wire wheeled it. Then I sand blasted it, primered it, and painted all the parts. Then put it all back together. What should I charge for that. It took me 4 hours. Should I charge the cheap bastard $160.00 for it? It doesn't sound right. I think around $50.00 would be fare. I loose!! And to top all that he will probably think that it's too much. At least I have work during these bad times.
Walk way looks nice Allan. I did the same thing with paving bricks. The wify was complaining about the dirt in the house. :lol: I also got side tracked by planting some fruit trees. :waah::lol::lol:

I agree with everything you said. Every situation I guess is different. I look at it like this. They come to us for a service. They have the option to do it them selves or pay the price. I know I sound like a hard A$$, but it's just the way I see it. Like on the Miata I gave the owner a choice. He could take the power mirrors apart (pita on miatas) or he could pay me to do it. He did it himself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jgh64pkup (Post 3279674)
glad you got the oil pump figured out
what type of tranny and rear gear are you goin with

I get to work this morning and Melling had sent me an email for me too call them. I had sent them an email with the new M-55 pump installed. I called them and he recommended that I didn't run that pump on a performance motor. He suggested that I run the 10553 pump. He said the M-55 pumps are prone to breaking. I told him my engine is balanced and is on rubber mounts and it is all together and painted now. I told him I will take my chances. Now that will always be in my mind everytime I stomp on it.:sumo:

I will be running a TCI350 with a 2500 stall and a 3.42 eaton posi.


Quote:

Originally Posted by 70 Suburban (Post 3279871)
I dont remember did u weld up the seams in your hood.

I haven't done it yet, but I will when I get to that point.

shrunken66stroker 04-27-2009 01:07 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
a little red pin striping would look nice on those cabinets.

jgh64pkup 04-27-2009 02:00 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
it should be alright what hp numbers is it going to make

70 Suburban 04-27-2009 04:12 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
I just did my good yesterday. way e-zer than the bed...I think I am going to do the fenders too.. I like alot of what you have going on here. Giving me lots of inspiration and ideas to work with.. only problem is you inspired me so much I stopped working on my blazer.. I guess the grass is always greener.

Strodder 04-27-2009 05:35 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shrunken66stroker (Post 3280507)
a little red pin striping would look nice on those cabinets.

And don't forget the BILLET handles, or should I say CHROME handles. :lol:

70 Suburban 04-27-2009 08:47 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
opps hood I did my hood yesterday

Alan's Classic 04-27-2009 09:28 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shrunken66stroker (Post 3280507)
a little red pin striping would look nice on those cabinets.

Not a bad idea.:lol:

Quote:

Originally Posted by jgh64pkup (Post 3280603)
it should be alright what hp numbers is it going to make

I would guess around 375 at the crank. I built it like Hotrod magazine did years ago and they got 400. When I had it in a 75 vette with a Turbo 350 and a 3.08 gear it felt like a dog. It never felt like I thought it should. It could have been the vette. The trans may have been wore out. We'll see when I run it in the truck.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 70 Suburban (Post 3280843)
I just did my good yesterday. way e-zer than the bed...I think I am going to do the fenders too.. I like alot of what you have going on here. Giving me lots of inspiration and ideas to work with.. only problem is you inspired me so much I stopped working on my blazer.. I guess the grass is always greener.

Thanks, I've only got one bedside done so far. Still gotta do the hood and fenders. Concentrating on the cab and engine and trans right now. Not too mention the kitchen overhaul.......I mean restoration.:lol: You know why the grass is greener on the other side of the fence............The septic tank is over there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strodder (Post 3280989)
And don't forget the BILLET handles, or should I say CHROME handles. :lol:

I can't stand chrome.:lol:

Quote:

Originally Posted by 70 Suburban (Post 3281299)
opps hood I did my hood yesterday

It took me a second, but I got it figured out.

Back too the kitchen I go.:sumo: My wife has been doing alot of it, she is a big help.:metal:

Strodder 04-27-2009 09:32 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan's Classic (Post 3281385)

Back too the kitchen I go.:sumo: My wife has been doing alot of it, she is a big help. :metal:


Yea my wife helps too. She points and says "you missed a spot". :lol:

ruffrida2005 04-27-2009 10:03 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Alan what factory gear came in your rear end. Mine has 4.10's and I want to change to a 3.42 but not sure if I can use my same housing.

ruffrida2005 04-27-2009 10:04 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
I got my frame in DP90, SD crossmember in, and motor and trans painted and put in. a lot of long hours for 3 days.

Strodder 04-27-2009 10:08 PM

Re: My 1965 build thread
 
Your frame looks really good Ruffrida. Why don't you start a build thread? Or did I miss it that one?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com