The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   1969 - 1972 Blazers and Jimmys Projects and Builds (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=211)
-   -   Project Madera: A Jimmy GT (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=570856)

jaros44sr 09-17-2014 05:53 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Sure helps me, as i hav nt gotten that far yet

Ya gotta downsize that pic way up top, hard to read your thread it s small....
Nevermind were on the next page

jjzepplin 09-17-2014 06:29 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
AWWW DAMN! I mean
AWWWWW DAAAMN!

skorpioskorpio 09-18-2014 12:09 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
I don't see how I can not get one, I mean eventually the truck is going to have a stripe of aluminum from radiator to fuel tank, interrupted by a steel rear end. It just doesn't seem right, not when I could have one of those. Already talked to a guy in San Bernardino who can fan up the tubes to use all my Moser parts. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon....

jaros44sr 09-18-2014 12:23 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Tried to google that company and part, but couldn t find it, any help....

watahyahknow 09-18-2014 01:22 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
you know looking at that diff i starting to wonder how difficult it would be to wittle it out of a piece of billet , looks pertty straight forwarth

skorpioskorpio 09-18-2014 03:42 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
5 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaros44sr (Post 6847793)
Tried to google that company and part, but couldn t find it, any help....

Sure:

http://speedmaster79.com/tds/rear-axle-housings/

There is also a previous versions of it that doesn't have the extended fluid capacity and uses round end axle tubes instead of octogonal end.

Attachment 1303112
Attachment 1303113
Attachment 1303114

Speedmaster only sells the new style with the saggy diaper bottom.

Attachment 1303115
Attachment 1303116

skorpioskorpio 09-18-2014 04:06 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by watahyahknow (Post 6847864)
you know looking at that diff i starting to wonder how difficult it would be to wittle it out of a piece of billet , looks pertty straight forwarth

Considering the kit costs under $600, I seriously doubt you'd be able to wittle one out of billet for anywhere close to that. The block of 6061 itself would probably cost you triple that, easily. The fabricator I talked to was giving me a non-binding quote of a grand (give or take) with ends and mounts installed on the tubes and races for my existing taper bearings.

The description on the kit claims being able to accept 28, 31 and 35 spline axles, and aluminum 3rd members are available from several manufactures (mine is from Moser). If you used a 35 in the rear and a 31 or even a 28 in front it'd make for one stout but somewhat light drive train. I know even a steel housing Ford 9 is lighter and stronger than a 12 bolt and probably half the weight of a 14 bolt or a Dana 60 (both of which are very seriously heavy).

zammer 10-04-2014 01:39 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Wow nice work! Subscribed!!

skorpioskorpio 10-05-2014 07:25 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Thanks, and I take that as a serious compliment from another building an unnessisarily complicated project :lol:. Your project is on my subscribed list as well.

skorpioskorpio 10-18-2014 04:58 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
3 Attachment(s)
It's a small thing but I'm excited about it, I scored 4 original NOS black Marchal covers for my "big" lights. These are almost non existent in any condition,
Attachment 1313927

and I already had matching ones for the fogs.
Attachment 1313928

...and revised my Photoshop rendering to show what they'd look like on the truck.
Attachment 1313929

watahyahknow 10-18-2014 06:45 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
i think you better only put them on there during cashows or they be gone before you know it
they kindah eazy to get off the lights

skorpioskorpio 10-19-2014 03:51 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Yea, I hear ya. The black covers will be the trucks fancy dress outfit. I have other covers as well that I value a lot less. I have white plastic covers (that are actually a ***** to get off) and the vinyl sock type, all of them are actually original Marchal covers. The plastic ones I also have matching fog covers the vinyl I don't. As a daily thing I don't think I'd cover the fogs anyway. The drivers and the spots on the other hand may technically violate laws to run them uncovered.

skorpioskorpio 10-22-2014 01:47 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
3 Attachment(s)
I guess I never posted pics of my crazy under floor hydroboost since it came back from machining. The mount is a Scott's Hotrods assembly but didn't clear the accumulator for the hydroboost so it needed to be machined to tuck the accumulator inside the frame rail. I also had all the holes counterbored for RivNuts so they would sit flush. I still plan on replacing the rodend for the booster with a split fork type and changing the bronze bearing inside the pedal pivot with a needle bearing assembly and also needle bearing thrust washers on the ends of the pivot so that it can operate really smoothly. The pedal also does not have a return spring which I'll also probably add.
Attachment 1315461
Attachment 1315462
Attachment 1315467

I also have to devise a new mount for the apportioning valve and residual check valves, the mount that is on it is too low, I don't want a valve that all the brake fluid runs through to be lower than the frame, that's a bad idea. This thing is going to be interesting to plumb with 3 brake lines, a portioning valve, 3 residual check valves, 2 remote reservoir lines, 3 hydraulic pressure lines, and 2 pressure limiting valves all crammed into a space the size of a load of bread.

Wasted Income 10-22-2014 02:34 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by skorpioskorpio (Post 6883811)
...and revised my Photoshop rendering to show what they'd look like on the truck.
Attachment 1313929

Maybe it's already been covered and I missed it...but it looks like all those lights might severely restrict airflow to the cooling system.

skorpioskorpio 10-22-2014 02:48 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wasted Income (Post 6888561)
Maybe it's already been covered and I missed it...but it looks like all those lights might severely restrict airflow to the cooling system.

Which is the reason for the spoiler, cowl hood and Trans Am extractors in the fenders, to direct airflow from below and give it a place to exit up high. Also plan to dimple die the roll pan to increase airflow. As long as there is a non pressure bound path and the general flow is low to high I don't see where the lights will have any real negative effect. Most new vehicles have hardly any frontal airflow at all.

Possmguts 11-17-2014 05:44 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Ok.. Im in.. following this to the end. You guys have way too much money!

watahyahknow 11-17-2014 06:55 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
it was my initial idea to use the atlas as whell , since i live in europe i found an engine that does about the same thing
- makes 245 hp and 289 lb·ft of torque in stock form
- 4 valves per cilinder
- twin overhead cams
- chain camdrive
- coil over plug ignition
- 4 liter
- forced crank
- 7 mainbearings
- normal oilpan with the sump in the back
- fully aluminium with cast iron liners
- comes stock with a 4l80e (in the high performance versions at least )
- is available with a supercharger and intercooler from the factorie making 322 hp and 378 lb·ft in stock form (and there not rare to find)

the donorcars with the engine and the trans can be found for about 500 to 1500 euro
the jaguar AJ6 4.0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_AJ6_engine
nice thing is that the jaguar xj6 4.0 and xjs6 4.0 usually come fully loaded with all kinds of luxury too like fully electric leather seats cruise controll and aircon

skorpioskorpio 11-17-2014 07:31 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
The Trailblazer engine is really similar dimensionally (bore x stroke, airflow, HP potential) to an old E-Type 4.2 liter, so I absolutely get where you are coming from. My goal is for the end result to have a E-Type sound to it, specifically I'm shooting for the sound of an Eagle E-Type, just a fantastic sounding engine.

watahyahknow 11-18-2014 03:42 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
i think doing a 6-2-1 collector on the exaust will help with that

skorpioskorpio 11-18-2014 11:54 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
1 Attachment(s)
Interesting, hadn't really considered that to be a contributor. My headers are 6-2-1s but the secondary collector is really short, although it's just a slip fit collector that I could easily extend. Maybe that is a good idea to extend the secondaries a bit before going into the single.

This is the best pic I have of my headers:

Attachment 1326122

Dagobah 11-20-2014 07:16 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
1 Attachment(s)
I'm fascinated by your project. Before reading this thread, I hadn't heard anything about the atlas motor. Not that changing directions at this point in the project would be a good idea, but had you ever considered something like this?

It seems like you're already doing a ton of fabricating, and I'm assuming that 3-d printing is only going to make one-off parts like this more affordable. Anyway, I'm looking forward to seeing more progress in your project.

watahyahknow 11-20-2014 10:11 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
if you could 3d print it in wax and make a lost mould casting of it , it could be done but you need to take the schrinkage of the aluminium in consideration (make the wax mould a percentage bigger)

skorpioskorpio 11-20-2014 04:26 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagobah (Post 6925383)
I'm fascinated by your project. Before reading this thread, I hadn't heard anything about the atlas motor. Not that changing directions at this point in the project would be a good idea, but had you ever considered something like this?

It seems like you're already doing a ton of fabricating, and I'm assuming that 3-d printing is only going to make one-off parts like this more affordable. Anyway, I'm looking forward to seeing more progress in your project.

Looks a bit like the Ryan Falconer engine:

http://falconerengines.com/images/fa...coner_l6_1.jpg

which is based on the 250/292 bottom end and along with the Atlas was used in GMs Baja and Pikes Peak racers. GM built it with Ryans help and Ryan retained ownership of the design (or bought it out) and now sells them for about $50,000 bare. In this program both of these engines in turbo form were pushing 700-850 HP during that program and dominated both events even against teammate trucks running Chevy V8s. The injection is available as an off the shelf product from Kinsler for the Falconer engine.

All that said I decided on what I did for a few reasons, one I felt it important to use a GM engine in my project, two I didn't want a push rod engine, three the Northstar has issues and in the end still sounds like a typical cross crank V8 (bubba-da-bubba-da...) and four GM never made a production V10 or V12, OK not a modern V12, the GMC V12 is actually a twin V6 and weighs near a ton.

You know putting anything in one of these trucks that isn't a variation on the original theme to what came in them is blasphemy to many so in the end putting a GM truck engine in a GM truck seemed like the way to go. There will always be the occasional, well my sisters cousins husband who works on these things all the time says that those engines are junk and you should have used a small block, garbage. Fact is that among the small community that are swapping these engines in, they consider 100,000 mile engines low milage, and there are others running these at the strip running high boost turbos and 800+HP and spinning them up past 10,000 rpm and I've heard no stories from that crowd about *any* catastrophic failures at all.

skorpioskorpio 11-20-2014 04:49 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by watahyahknow (Post 6925502)
if you could 3d print it in wax and make a lost mould casting of it , it could be done but you need to take the schrinkage of the aluminium in consideration (make the wax mould a percentage bigger)

Shrinkage rate for investment cast is 100.008% or that is the scale you need to compensate for when doing your print. I am 3D printing my intake manifold to have it investment cast. A head or a block is probably too big and too complicated to investment cast as your shrinkage ratios at that scale start to become non-linear, and good luck finding cheap access to a 3D printer that can print it...and it'd probably take weeks to print. Probably not a practical project. Even my manifold will need to be printed in at least 2, and maybe 3 pieces and then glued up (or actually melted together as I am going to print straight to wax).

An engine block and heads has all kinds of internal water jackets, lots of post cast machining, lots of blind passages that are difficult to get the casting medium out of, it's a lot more thought and a lot more complicated, and probably really needs to be done as sand cast, which means cores and all that.

If I was going to do a whole engine it'd probably be a V12, and would probably be a 60 degree so the math worked out, and probably use something like a Harley connecting rod to keep it as short as possible. But having to rely on others for this sort of thing means such a project would take insane amounts of money. Don't get me wrong designing an engine from the ground up is a dream of mine, just not a practical one.

watahyahknow 11-21-2014 03:58 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
yeah i think even the factorie makes the core with the water passages and stuff seperate from the outside , it would take time and monet allthough the price might go down over the next coupe of years

skorpioskorpio 11-21-2014 01:02 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by watahyahknow (Post 6926665)
yeah i think even the factorie makes the core with the water passages and stuff seperate from the outside , it would take time and monet allthough the price might go down over the next coupe of years

I looked into cored sand cast for my manifold, even sat down and consulted with a foundry on the project, but since I personally only need one, and I don't think there is a market for more, I sought out industrial investment casting instead.

Cored sand cast gets a little more complicated in that you need to be able to suspend the core, where you split the cast has to be taken into consideration, the angles of flanges and such need to be tapered so that the material can flow right and that it can be removed, the shrinkage rates differ from inside to outside, anyway, a lot more complicated.

There will probably be great advances in 3D printing in coming years and there will also be splits in the different technologies being developed. The really cool tech is the laser reactive powdered media printing where the part just grows out of a powdered media instead of the tech that is currently being consumerized which is more like laying down media with a tiny controlled caulk gun. The reactive media printing is the one that can actually print out of more industrially useful materials like metals from the get go, very very expensive at this point though.

If I didn't have friends with access to the printers. the printing would actually cost me more than the casting at this stage, so it's not cheap. Also the down side of 3D printers is that they are not exactly smooth. I may end up doing some post print smoothing to make the cast look more like a traditional cast. I've also considered doing a inverse print and making foam cores, since that is what the Atlas block is and it would continue the "look" into the manifold. If you look at the Atlas block it looks like Styrofoam.

Anyway it's posted elsewhere in the thread but here's the manifold design again:

Attachment 1327076
Attachment 1327077

Dagobah 12-07-2014 02:07 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
you seem like a guy with a lot of know-how and excess funds. I wonder how much more difficult and costly a DOHC conversion would be than what you're already doing. I'm wondering how much it would cost for a 292/250, if it would be marketable, if there's demand for such a thing...but if I'm COMPLETELY honest, the only reason I wonder if it would ever make good business sense is just to fund the project so that I could have it for my c10. Oh pipe dreams...

watahyahknow 12-07-2014 02:26 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
i know they did a 32 valve conversion on the old big block still using the stock camshaft and pushrods and some realy trick rockers
arias made a set of billet 32 valve heads for the small block too
both where somwhere in the eighties
it turned out you can actually get better flowing heads with two valves per cilinder and some extensive development work wish is the reason the LS engines still have 2 valves per cilinder
maibe this will help :
http://www.69pace.com/6shooters.htm
theres one that made an aluminium inline 6 head by lopping of one combustion chamber of a set of good flowing aluminium v8 heads and weld them together

skorpioskorpio 12-07-2014 04:19 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagobah (Post 6947556)
you seem like a guy with a lot of know-how and excess funds. I wonder how much more difficult and costly a DOHC conversion would be than what you're already doing. I'm wondering how much it would cost for a 292/250, if it would be marketable, if there's demand for such a thing...but if I'm COMPLETELY honest, the only reason I wonder if it would ever make good business sense is just to fund the project so that I could have it for my c10. Oh pipe dreams...

My engine, with less than 10k miles on it and from a vehicle that was totaled when it was less than a year old, cost me $1500 shipped from the other side of the country. I couldn't do a DOHC cylinder head with 10 times that, maybe 20 times that or more to get it right. In the end it'd still be sitting on a cast iron block from the '50s and probably still need to have at least a fake cam in the block to make the bottom end still work. Not sure what the point of it would be. Everything I need to invest in the trailblazer engine, I'd still need to invest in this, it doesn't save anything anywhere and wouldn't result in something better.

Maybe making a flat crank V8 out of two DOHC fours might be worth it, or maybe a modern double six based on two Buick or 4.3l Chevy V6s with a common crank. Just not getting the gain of a new head for the 250/292, I can't see where it would be dramatically better than the Pontiac OHC six that already exists and is already based on the 250.

skorpioskorpio 12-07-2014 04:53 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by watahyahknow (Post 6947566)
i know they did a 32 valve conversion on the old big block still using the stock camshaft and pushrods and some realy trick rockers
arias made a set of billet 32 valve heads for the small block too
both where somwhere in the eighties
it turned out you can actually get better flowing heads with two valves per cilinder and some extensive development work wish is the reason the LS engines still have 2 valves per cilinder
maibe this will help :
http://www.69pace.com/6shooters.htm
theres one that made an aluminium inline 6 head by lopping of one combustion chamber of a set of good flowing aluminium v8 heads and weld them together

I think you can still get the Arao Engineering 32 valve heads for small and big block Chevys as well as Windsor block Fords. There is a lot going on in those heads, still pushrod and triple the moving parts. Very cool though. I actually talked to them long ago about doing a 6 cyl head, but not for a 6 but for a v12. It wouldn't be anything close to cheap but between them, World Castings and Crower, and a fair amount of making it worth their while money thrown around you could put together a 7.5-10 liter 48 valve small block pushrod V12 and probably for about the same cost as a Ryan Falconer V12, about $60K.

watahyahknow 12-07-2014 07:41 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
i know the aj8 24 valva heads will fit a jag v12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peJznOKmEKs
the later jags where 5.0 i believe

not sure if theres a stock inline 6 head with the same cilinderspacing , if there is it might be cheaper to adapt the deck of a inline 6 chevy to bolt that head on

skorpioskorpio 12-07-2014 06:53 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by watahyahknow (Post 6947670)
i know the aj8 24 valva heads will fit a jag v12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peJznOKmEKs
the later jags where 5.0 i believe

not sure if theres a stock inline 6 head with the same cilinderspacing , if there is it might be cheaper to adapt the deck of a inline 6 chevy to bolt that head on

That Jag engine's pretty awesome.

watahyahknow 12-07-2014 09:21 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
i later on read some more about it , it seems its not as eazy as slapping them on , only the cilinderspacing is the same but the block isnt rigid enough for the head to be fitted without extensive welding to the decks , sorry about that

mcmlxix 01-17-2015 07:27 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Any progress?

skorpioskorpio 01-18-2015 04:59 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Waiting on Porterbuilt at this point, my chassis, engine, and all that are in Arizona. In the mean time I've been working on my parts taxi, the '03 Sonoma. I keep walking around with a tape measure and a set of digital calipers but I have nothing to measure :lol:. I've also decided in the mean time that I'll be getting a lost media friendly 3D printer in 2015 to design parts, this technology has really hit a stride in the last year or so, and well frankly I'm getting tired of resources disappearing on me and plan on trying to be a lot more self sufficient on this project going forward.

CParnell 02-26-2015 04:35 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Subscribed. Not sure how I missed this. I'm building my 68 GMC with the same engine and transmission combo.

skorpioskorpio 02-28-2015 05:06 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CParnell (Post 7066897)
Subscribed. Not sure how I missed this. I'm building my 68 GMC with the same engine and transmission combo.

You are planning on using a 4L80?

mtully79 03-30-2015 05:00 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
Any progress on the build?

mcmlxix 05-22-2015 12:58 AM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
How about now?

68 Four on the Floor 06-09-2015 10:40 PM

Re: Project Madera: A Jimmy GT
 
I've been away awhile. That rendering looks pretty trick. Ever thought about have it laser or hydro cut out and tig welded together?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com