The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   Suspension (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=431083)

54Caddy 11-15-2010 11:56 PM

cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Is any one running the totally tubular control arms. I am debating between the ride tech control arms, cpps totally tubular, and porterbuilt arms. I am wanting to know if any of these arms will work with 3 inch drop spindle. Also with these arms what kind of stabilizer bar are you guys running. Thanks for any info you guys have.

Brandon

PBFAB.COM 11-16-2010 01:04 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 54Caddy (Post 4297038)
Is any one running the totally tubular control arms. I am debating between the ride tech control arms, cpps totally tubular, and porterbuilt arms. I am wanting to know if any of these arms will work with 3 inch drop spindle. Also with these arms what kind of stabilizer bar are you guys running. Thanks for any info you guys have.

Brandon

Our arms are compatible with a 3" drop spindle... as well as the other two brands you have listed. :)

What are you looking to achieve? What are your plans for the suspension/truck? The main differences between our arms and the others are that our arms use delrin bushings, and they also have approx. 1/2 inch more drop built into them than the ART arms.

BossHogg69 11-16-2010 01:06 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
I'm running CPP tubular A-arms, CPP 2.5" dropped spindle, CPP 2" dropped spring and CPP sway bar. With the brands you mentioned, you really can't go wrong, they are all very nice pieces.

I also have a Porterbuilt Adjustable Trailing Arm crossmember, fwiw...

54Caddy 11-16-2010 01:28 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
the set up will be something simple for the time being. Up front i will use the plates and bags i had asked you about with 3 inch drop spindles and a set of tubular control arms. In the rear i will run ridetech's air over leaf system with a bolt in c notch and will try to lay out on the notch. The reason for the tubular control arms is because i like the look they have extra drop built into them and the clearance for the rims compare as to using stock control arms and having to trim them off a lot i plan on running stock 15s for a while till i can afford either 18s or 20s

54Caddy 11-17-2010 12:44 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
so no one on here has the cpp arms at all??

mac72 11-17-2010 01:27 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
I'm running cpp lowers with a suicide doors crossmember.Ordered them without doing some research & realized they wont work w/ airlift 2600's.Had to sw. to 2500's in the front & they barely fit.For the record this was not a design fault,they are pretty good quality pieces for the price their just made to run a smaller bag.They have the factory swaybar spacing.

c10seconds 11-17-2010 02:59 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
4 Attachment(s)
Im using cpp uppers and lowers along with their 2'' modular spindle and sway bar. The bags im wanting to use are the ones in the pic. Slam Specialties 7's. As you can see the bag is bolted in place and there isnt that much room. Ive seen the same bag in a PB arm and there is a huge difference in area for larger bags. The cpp arms are very nice IMO but i guess it all depends on which bags you plan on using.

54Caddy 11-17-2010 05:15 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
looks like cpp arms are out of the picture for me i will be running slam specialties ss 7 bags up front im sure they will not clear like the ones pictured. so now its between the ride tech and porterbuilt arms. Guys running porterbuilts what are you running as far as a sway bar goes??

PBFAB.COM 11-17-2010 06:24 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 54Caddy (Post 4299942)
looks like cpp arms are out of the picture for me i will be running slam specialties ss 7 bags up front im sure they will not clear like the ones pictured. so now its between the ride tech and porterbuilt arms. Guys running porterbuilts what are you running as far as a sway bar goes??

We run a 1.25" OD bar.... give me a buzz and I will make you a pretty sweet package deal.

Nate

tech@scottshotrods 11-17-2010 07:13 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Best advice I can give is there all quality arms, I working for Air Ride/ Ride Tech for so long could be bias and say Air Ride but.... Yes Air Ride has done there home work and will work great, but so will Porter Builts and I'm sure CPPs, what it comes down to when dealing with said reputable companies would be who gives you the best service followed by price.

lowdownstar 11-17-2010 08:01 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
I would or should i say i did, put my money on Nathan's at porter built and i have never looked back! He has the best customer service i have ever seen or dealt with. Just my 2cents




Ray

mac72 11-17-2010 10:07 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lowdownstar (Post 4300197)
I would or should i say i did, put my money on Nathan's at porter built and i have never looked back! He has the best customer service i have ever seen or dealt with. Just my 2cents




Ray

Yeah I second that Ray.Everytime I try to save a little cash it ends up biting me in the _ss!!! Should have gone the same route.I know in the end I wont be happy w/ the 2500's I'll end up selling the cpp's & getting SD's or porterbuilts
Mac

2wd73blazer 11-19-2010 05:40 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Has anyone run the swaybar off a 2nd gen 4x4 S10? Suicide Doors says you can run it with their crossmember and control arms. I was in the junk yard today and looked at them. It is one beefy looking sway bar. Are they compatible with porterbuilt drop member and arms?

67cheby 11-19-2010 07:32 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Porterbuilt, has the sway bar, i got mine from him, very nice piece

54Caddy 11-19-2010 09:54 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
any pictures or his sway bar??

PBFAB.COM 11-19-2010 09:57 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 54Caddy (Post 4303866)
any pictures or his sway bar??

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=406070&page=8

post #195

54Caddy 11-19-2010 10:05 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
that sway bar is a beast nate! every get the quote all set it give me a call when you have it thanks man.

PCHRODS 12-15-2010 03:40 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 54Caddy (Post 4299608)
so no one on here has the cpp arms at all??

We had the CPP arms on our 69 Chevy Truck, and we took them off, with them buried against the frame with no shims we only 0 deg of camber, great for street driving, but not so good for performance or handling. We recently switched over the the Hotchkis Suspension arms, which are by far the best in my opinion. It also centers the wheel in the front wheel well which is a must on these trucks because they kinda look off in the stock location. And the handleing is "unmatched" to others out there. Here check out this link and you can see some pics of the truck and the suspension

http://speedhunters.com/archive/2010...hevy-c-10.aspx

N2TRUX 12-15-2010 11:36 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PCHRODS (Post 4350968)
..... We recently switched over the the Hotchkis Suspension arms, which are by far the best in my opinion...... And the handleing is "unmatched" to others out there. Here check out this link and you can see some pics of the truck and the suspension.

Nice article Rob, thanks for sharing. Since you have had more than one suspension set up on your truck, please discuss your findings.

jimmydean 12-15-2010 12:34 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PCHRODS (Post 4350968)
We had the CPP arms on our 69 Chevy Truck, and we took them off, with them buried against the frame with no shims we only 0 deg of camber, great for street driving, but not so good for performance or handling. We recently switched over the the Hotchkis Suspension arms, which are by far the best in my opinion. It also centers the wheel in the front wheel well which is a must on these trucks because they kinda look off in the stock location. And the handleing is "unmatched" to others out there. Here check out this link and you can see some pics of the truck and the suspension

http://speedhunters.com/archive/2010...hevy-c-10.aspx

Wow, that truck looks incredible. Nice work.

CPPJEFF 12-15-2010 12:57 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Just like most said above we make a killer arm but it really depends on what your actually after. Great topic!! We have some great deals on arms right now if anyone needs a set!!

PCHRODS 12-15-2010 05:29 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt vs. hotchkis
 
Let me start out by saying, I am not going to put anyones product down, every vendor in this thread that has been mentioned, builds some really nice products, some of which i have not used. And each manufacturer has there own intentions on what their suspension is designed for, Some primarily go for ride height, some for ride, some for looks, and some for all. Now our truck has what I think is the best of all worlds " in my eyes" Not everyone likes my truck and not everyone thinks that racing a truck like ours is Mentally stable.... But I built the truck to achieve the things that I wanted it to, when we first built it in 07 we had CPP upper and lower arms in front, which were a drastic improvement over stock, allowing us to lower the truck and still keep the alignment in factory spec. Which was great! We used Early Classic Enterprises Big Block 2"drop springs, they are the only ones i could find that offered a drop spring for a big block with the correct spring rates, We also used Early Classic Enterprises Trans Crossmember, and Extreme Drop Rear Cross member and their trailing arms and rear springs, with the super track bar and shock relocation brackets. My primary reasoning for choosing all the ECC products, is mainly for the fact that we wanted the chassis to look as "stock" as possible, and ECC's crossmember are beefy strong, and I was really pleased with the asthetics of their products, it tucked everything up inside the frame rails which gives the truck a really clean look. We are throwing 640HP and 650 FT TQ at this stuff and the last thing i want was something to break or bend. Now here's for the fun part, earlier this year we started auto crossing and road racing our truck, which at first i was skeptical, but our 4280 lb monster did quite well, our first run out placed 2nd, not bad for a rookie.

When we started racing the truck it had all the components listed above. But as we got faster and the tires got bigger and stickier, the suspension wasn't able to keep up with what "we" needed. So we knocked on the door of Hotchkis Suspension. Why? Because Hotchkis builds Complete suspension kits a.k.a Total Vehicle Systems, with one thing in mind HANDLING!! Ride height and ride quality come with the kit too for free, the money is in the performance. We upgraded upper and lower arms,center link, sway bars, shock relocation brackets, and the track bar. We added a few of our own products to up the anty to their kit,(which isn't necessary but we wanted to be able to fine tune it for different tracks) AFCO double adjustable shocks, and an AGR Quick Ratio Steering box. Let me also add this, The hotchkis kit is not a race only suspension, it performs top notch on and off the track, i wouldn't hesitate to drive my truck from here to florida and back and hit every race track in between. Now here's an example of how the improvement overall was better. At the events we go to there are some purpose built race/street cars there primarily some gnarly camaros that give me goose bumps to say the least. We used to be a good 4 seconds slower on the courses then them, now some of them we are faster than, and a couple we will probably spend the rest of eterity chasing but we are only a second away from some of the best autocross cars out there. But to shave off 3-4 seconds on an autocross track is huge, and not easy. We spend all day tuning to shave off tenths, but with the Hotchkis TVS, it chewed off seconds!! I haven't driven a C-10 that will out handle our truck. I am not saying this to be arogant or push the Hotchkis Brand.You asked me for my opinion on what works and why. I have had this truck since 1996 and and it's had some serious overhauls and mods done to it, but i can honestly say when it comes to the chassis, it's done, it doesn't really get any better than where it's at now. I encourage anyone to show me up and prove me wrong, I don't claim to know everything or to be the best at anything. But I do claim to try my best at everything I know. I guess that's my two cents.:ennyd::ennyd:

jimmydean 12-15-2010 05:53 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Hearing about a classic at an autocross made me think of this:


I want to see what it would do with the shorter wheelbase on bags.

<Edit> For those who don't know, that's Frizzle Fry before he cut his burb up.

PCHRODS 12-15-2010 07:43 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Here's one of our truck at OUSCI 2010 ( Optima ultimate street car invitational)




Alvin 12-15-2010 09:11 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Whoa! Okay, that's pretty dang impressive.

54Caddy 12-16-2010 12:47 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
so how much did the hotchkis arms cost you have a link to them? and do they make them also for air suspension or just strictly coils?

VA72C10 12-16-2010 01:27 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
very interesting thread!

N2TRUX 12-16-2010 11:30 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Rob- Thank you for taking the time to give us the complete story on your trucks suspension. We are all avid performance truck enthusiasts and love to see a well tuned C-10. In the past few years, the primary emphasis of of this forum has been toward properly lowering trucks. Recent months have seen a huge interest toward trucks that ride low with improved handling.

We have a huge pool of knowledge and talent here with our staff, members, and especially our vendors. We truly appreciate your sharing the hands on experience with your truck. Please keep us posted on your continued success next season.

jimmydean 12-16-2010 12:57 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Wow, that truck is a serious performer. If I could get my truck to handle half that well, I would be happy.

PCHRODS 12-17-2010 01:53 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 54Caddy (Post 4352794)
so how much did the hotchkis arms cost you have a link to them? and do they make them also for air suspension or just strictly coils?

You may be able to run bags with it if you wanted the spring pocket is a flat based recessed pocket with a polyurethane spring locater that is removable. But I am not familiar with bag diameters and such, we don't work with alot of that stuff. But here's a link for the Hotchkis Suspension Page for the complete kit, and you can navigate around for individual parts too.

http://www.hotchkis.net/6772_c10_2wd...le_system.html

PCHRODS 12-17-2010 01:58 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by N2TRUX (Post 4353329)
Rob- Thank you for taking the time to give us the complete story on your trucks suspension. We are all avid performance truck enthusiasts and love to see a well tuned C-10. In the past few years, the primary emphasis of of this forum has been toward properly lowering trucks. Recent months have seen a huge interest toward trucks that ride low with improved handling.

We have a huge pool of knowledge and talent here with our staff, members, and especially our vendors. We truly appreciate your sharing the hands on experience with your truck. Please keep us posted on your continued success next season.

I totally agree with you, as I was in the same boat. When we built the truck I never thought I would be doing what I am doing with it now. I, like others, have the thought process that racing road courses in a big box was not an option. Man, did I ever prove myself wrong on that one!! I will definetly keep everyone in the loop on what we are up to, I am in aww and overly impressed with the amount of positive feedback we have received from members on this site.

54Caddy 12-18-2010 12:39 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
wowo that price is a little high for my blood ahaha. and also for 67-72 which is fine i have a 68 that i am looking to into setting up to handle great with a static drop. Thanks for the info keep up that truck man

Wild83C10 12-18-2010 11:27 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
PCHRODS, can you give some details on how the Rear Anti Squat Bracket System works? Thanks

lolife99 12-18-2010 11:36 AM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
PCHRODS,... I'm interested in the Hotchkis centerlink.
What are the advantages to swithing to it? (bumpsteer?)
Can it be used with my current drop components,... or is strictly for Hotchkis spindles and a-arms?

mcboomport 04-13-2011 03:59 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by porterbuilt (Post 4300043)
We run a 1.25" OD bar.... give me a buzz and I will make you a pretty sweet package deal.

Nate

Nate,
I am looking for some lower a-arms for my bagged 75, I am running 3" DjM drop spindles and slam specialties 7 bags. I am also running an end link style Belltech Sway bar. Will this sway bar work with your lowers?

PBFAB.COM 04-13-2011 04:47 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mcboomport (Post 4622553)
Nate,
I am looking for some lower a-arms for my bagged 75, I am running 3" DjM drop spindles and slam specialties 7 bags. I am also running an end link style Belltech Sway bar. Will this sway bar work with your lowers?

If it is a factory dimensioned bar specific to the C10... YES. :)

mcboomport 04-13-2011 05:07 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by porterbuilt (Post 4622920)
If it is a factory dimensioned bar specific to the C10... YES. :)

The sway bar mounts to the existing "outer mounting holes" on the stock a-arms for the stock swaybar. The holes just had to be drilled out larger.

mcboomport 05-17-2011 03:21 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Nate, How do I contact you to make an order? ... Sorry, I found it in the forum..
Lance

PBFAB.COM 05-17-2011 03:24 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mcboomport (Post 4685569)
Nate, How do I contact you to make an order? ... Sorry, I found it in the forum..
Lance

Give me a call: 480-326-6303

If I don't pick up, leave a message and I will call you right back.

Nate

belowme51 05-18-2011 12:31 PM

Re: cpp control arms vs ride tech vs porterbuilt
 
Porterbuilt is the way to go....beautiful product and you can see that someone really has taken the time to make a part for you by hand. these are not some mass production pieces.....I have just about every porterbuilt product for my 70 from Nathan and from purchase to install Nathan is there for you. I will vouch for Porterbuilt any day of the week!
::::::MEMBERS ONLY BABY!!!!:::::::::


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com