![]() |
Drop spindles and increased track width..
1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 1499002
I have a 64 GMC 1000 that I purchased this summer. The previous owner converted the front to disc with 2.5" McGaughys drop spindles. He told me that this conversion added what seemed like " a few" inches to the track width. This week I finally received my Mob Steel steelies and mounted them up. I also changed out the front springs to a CPP 3" drop spring. This achieved tucking the rubber into the fender well, but with the backspacing I ordered there is rubbing during turning/compression. I'm trying to see if anyone knows if there are other drop spindles that maintain the stock track width or even narrow it a bit. I want to end up with a Porterbuilt stage 2 set up which can be customized to fit my track width, but for now, while I'm broke, I'm trying to find the best way to solve this issue. I see my options as of now are: -Put the 1" drop spring back in that didn't cause any issue, but the stance is t right Or -Find a set of spindles that can narrow the track width (best option if it is available) And/or -Roll the fender lip tight to see if it gets me enough room (don't think it will though) Or -Find $2000 to buy the PB Fab stage 2 front set up (wife will shoot me) Let me know what you guys think. Thanks for your time in advance. |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Run a shorter front tire?
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
I also have the McGaughys drop spindle disc brake to install on my 64, what front back spacing dud you order?
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Your tires look really tall.
What size are they? How did you determine what backspace to order on your Mobsteel wheels? Seems like you just need more backspacing to suck the wheels in. |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
No exact dimension compared to: 1) drum brake spindles 2) oem disc brake spindle 3) standard 2.5" or 3" drop spindle. The CPP Modular spindle is narrower,... but by how much has never been documented. |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
I measured for backspacing using all the resources on this site. It was my first time doing it, but did get confirmation from my tire guy. More backspacing would definitely fix the issue, but buying more wheels is not an option. The wheels are 20x9 with 5.5" BS. Tires are Toyo Proxi ST II, 275-45-20. I was going off of PB Fab, and wanting to end at a dropmember. The figures I referenced talked of a 30" tall tire setup. These measure out at 29.7". When everything was mounted, I had a 2.5" drop spindle and 1.5" drop springs, and nothing rubbed. But stance wise, it didn't look right to me. There was a 1" gap between the front fender lip and the rubber. I changed to springs to 3" drop, and all went bad. I would love to find a drop spindle that would retain the stock (or narrower) track width but for now I'm going to put the longer springs back in so I can get back to driving it. I'm at the firehouse today, but tomorrow I am going to pull some numbers on my track width to compare to stock, and other members who have stock suspension with different drop spindles.
Easiest fix would have been more back spacing and/or a 275/40/20. I went back and forth a hundred times on both of these decisions. Both were new to me and a bit daunting. With this being a pretty big purchase for me, I definitely put much thought and effort into it. But didn't account for the additional drop that I planned. I appreciate all assistance in correcting this issue. Thanks guys. |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
If the tires are the same front & back then you'll have a spare set for the rear & won't have to worry about smoking the rear tires since you have a spare set lol
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
I like your thinking! Just have to see if I can sell that to the wife. Ha ha.
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
I would run a 20x8 (5.5" backspace) with a 245/40-20 tire up front.
A 9" rim and a 275/45 is huge up front on a low truck. If you move that big tire in with a narrower drop spindle, will you rub on the inner fender? |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
Hopefully I can get it figured out without needing to do that, but nothing is ever off the table. Thanks again for all the ideas. I'm going to call some different manufactures tomorrow and ask some questions. Thanks, Brandon |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 1499119
Here is where I was at after just installing the wheel/tire set up, with the 1 1/2" drop springs. I didn't have any rub issues on the 1 1/2 hour drive home. Just for reference. |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Are your rear wheels & tires the same size as the front?
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
Just trying to get my numbers straight for the 63-66 trucks. What year rearend is in the truck? |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
The stance is not bad on the taller spring. You have got a lot of tire on there so you may have to live with the taller spring till you can get a drop member under it with the narrow arms on it.
Jimmy |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
So it looks like 20x8 4.5 bs is the way to go for lowered springs or bagged stock arms and rear end.
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
Too many differences and mods that might not be mentioned in a thread. |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
If the Porterbuilt setup is made for a 30” tire and that’s what you want to end up with in the long run it would probably be best just to throw the 1.5” drop springs in and save the money towards what you really want. You won’t have the cool rake but it still looks really good. I think you would have to spend several hundred bucks towards a solution to a problem that is basically temporary if your tire and wheel will work with the PB setup. :chevy:
All that said. I agree with lowlife99. 30" tires a pretty big on a lowered truck. |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Another vote for different back spacing on the wheels. I replaced my front end with one for a 2003 Lincoln Towncar (Ford Panther front end) and went thru 3 sets of wheels before I got the back spacing right. I also went thru two sets of springs. But now it looks good. Nothing spending money won't fix. But once you get it, you have it. :)
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
I'll be home in a couple hours, and then I'll start making some calls and doing some measurements on my current track width. I'll need to find out what the stock track width is for a 1964 GMC 1000. I'm sure it is on here somewhere. Then the taller springs will go back in, and see where things go from there. Now that PB's new site is up, I double checked the tire height numbers and they reference a 29" tall tire when quoting ground clearance levels with the different drop kits. I was going to call them and get their input also. Thanks everyone for the assistance. B
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Project delayed for a day due to needs around our small farm. I'll let everyone know what I find hopefully tomorrow evening.
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
I made some calls this morning and here is what I've found so far. All information below was from the tech support line at each individual company:
McGaughys (pronounced McGoy i learned) -their 2 1/2" drop spindle adds +3/8" to each side for a total of +3/4" added to overall track width CPP -their modular 2 1/2" drop spindle does not change the stock drum brake track width you had prior to converting to their spindles and disc brakes. They said their may be "minor" differences based on individual truck, but should not be a measurable difference. Called Porter Built and left a message. More info to come . |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Well the 1.5" springs are going back in and my two credit cards are full! I got the "approval" from the misses to call Porterbuilt and order some goodies. "It's an investment dear.." Actually she is very supportive of my truck addiction, most of the time.
Talked with Dave at PB, and he helped me work out exactly what I wanted. He was extremely helpful and knowledgeable about all things C-10. Great experience. I went with their stage 2 front kit, and an extreme dropmember rear. I'm going to run the bags with the schraeder valve setup for now. Decided on the stage two with the 1" narrowed control arms. We figured that about $1300 of the $1600 worth of parts would cross over onto the front drop member if I end up going that way down the road. On the rear, almost none of the stage two rear would cross over, so I spent the additional $200 to get the drop member now. Really excited to get the project under way. Should arrive around the end of March. Until then time to clean the garage and work some overtime to pay the credit cards. |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Sounds like a good plan. The waiting will be tough. Kind of like how many days till Christmas when your a kid.
Jimmy |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
I haven't pulled the trigger on my front from porterbuilt for my 64 yet. Did you get the deluxe stage 2 front kit? Does that come with upper & lower arms? Did you go 1" in & 1" forward on the arms? With the McGaughys disc kit I think I'd need the 63 70 ball joints. So what's not used when you swap over to the dropmember? Sorry for so many questions I gotta call porterbuilt lol
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
"Sounds like a good plan. The waiting will be tough. Kind of like how many days till Christmas when your a kid.
Jimmy" Definitely will be a hard wait. I just finished up waiting the six weeks for my wheels, too bad I didn't plan a little better. Oh well, it will give me time to strip down the truck and clean and paint the frame. Quote:
I went with the stage 2 deluxe front. The deluxe comes with the upper control arms. That is the only difference between the stage 2 standard and deluxe. Per the recommendation of Dave at PB, I went with 1" narrowed only. I want to end up with a front drop member, so if you do the 1" forward now with the stage 2, then when i switch to the drop member the wheels will be too far forward. If you want to stay with the stage 2 front, then go with the 1" forward to center your wheels. The 1" narrower option would depend on what your set up needs. When changing from the stage 2 to the front drop member, everything crosses over except for the shocks and shock relocation brackets I believe. In the rear I went with the drop member instead of the stage 2 rear because Dave said almost none of the stage 2 rear would cross over. I think just the bags. So I felt it was worth a few hundred more to not have to waste money later. As far as ball joints, you'll need whatever set up you have. I got the 73-87 joints with the front kit. I'm going to get the CPP spindles to gain back the 3/4" on my track width. For now, I will just need to get new tie rod ends for a 73-87 as well. Any other questions, I'll do my best to help out. |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
1 Attachment(s)
i went with porterbuilt a arms pushed 1" in and centered..rear mild set up think stage 2...all accuair setup.
cpp modular but the braking is soft....i probably should have went with wildwood setup for brakes |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
P. :D |
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Good looking truck AR, is that picture aired out?
|
Re: Drop spindles and increased track width..
Quote:
yes I think it is aired out.....I went with going as low as you can without messing with inner fenders...back bed or hood hinges. still use truck for home depot runs...helping friends move etc... |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com