The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   63 C 10 it begins (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=356151)

Craven Moorhead 08-04-2009 12:27 PM

63 C 10 it begins
 
2 Attachment(s)
Here it is after getting it home, picked up an 80 front end including brake booster and all power steering components, looking for a 71/72 five lug rear.
Measured the suspension and arrived at the following Plan 2.5” drop spindles and –2” springs in the front, going to c notch the rear with +2” blocks –3” springs. Any comments on that set up or recommendations feel free to chime in.

MacAttack 08-04-2009 12:53 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
1 Attachment(s)
Very nice truck!

72BlckButy 08-04-2009 02:13 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Great looking '65, good luck with the build!

aerotruk63 08-04-2009 02:48 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
"63" is there any year better? Good luck with your truck.

Tx Firefighter 08-04-2009 04:28 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
I'd go straight to 5 inch rear springs rather than 3 inch plus 2 inch blocks. The 3 and 5 inch springs cost the same money. Plus, the lowering blocks get the bottom of the u bolts near the scrub line and can look a bit funny from the rear view.

Joemomma1 08-04-2009 04:39 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by aerotruk63 (Post 3447002)
"63" is there any year better? Good luck with your truck.

Yes...actually 3 years. 64,65,66.

Craven Moorhead 08-04-2009 05:08 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Thanks Guys

Kevin:
The reason I was considering a block and spring combo was to try and optimize travel and not compromise the ride as much but the scrub line consideration is a good point. Do you feel like there is an optimum combo when considering use and ride quality when lowering to this point, like 1” blocks and – 4” springs? Just springs would be easier. I want to lower the truck conventionally (no air bags) as low as possible and still have the suspension work reasonably well.

blackmopar 08-04-2009 05:57 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Moorhead (Post 3447244)
Thanks Guys

Kevin:
The reason I was considering a block and spring combo was to try and optimize travel and not compromise the ride as much but the scrub line consideration is a good point. Do you feel like there is an optimum combo when considering use and ride quality when lowering to this point, like 1” blocks and – 4” springs? Just springs would be easier. I want to lower the truck conventionally (no air bags) as low as possible and still have the suspension work reasonably well.

im at 4 inch lower coils and no ride compromise - i wish i woulda gone 5 - get the 5inch hd/tow coils and you should still be abel to pull a wagon

Tx Firefighter 08-04-2009 06:57 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
First, let me say, I have lowered all of my trucks for the last 20 years (probably 8 of them). I always go straight to 6 inch springs. If I am towing a trailer pretty often, 5 inch springs. After my divorce, I parted out a lot of motorcycles for extra cash. I hauled Goldwings even in the bed of my step side with 6 inch springs. It would bottom sometimes with a huge bike like that, but anything lighter never a bump.

Craven Moorhead 08-04-2009 07:02 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Thanks for the insight sounds like the -5 springs are the way to go then.

63deluxfleet 08-05-2009 12:01 AM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
..

63deluxfleet 08-05-2009 12:02 AM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joemomma1 (Post 3447197)
Yes...actually 3 years. 64,65,66.

yea rite 63 is the best year nice grille with the wrap around windshield and the dash has way more character the front windshields on 64-66 look retarded. also the triangular door tops yuccck

Captainfab 08-05-2009 01:03 AM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Welcome to the board :D

Post up some pics when you get started on her.

And Oh Yeah......'63's are best :metal:

Joemomma1 08-05-2009 03:17 AM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 63deluxfleet (Post 3448102)
yea rite 63 is the best year nice grille with the wrap around windshield and the dash has way more character the front windshields on 64-66 look retarded. also the triangular door tops yuccck


Well you obviously have no sense of taste nor have you ever had the pleasure of owning a 64-66. You just gave the 2 reasons (dash, winshield) why the 60-63 are stupid ugly. Now dont take this as an attack I was just answering a question. I will now state the obvious, all that matters is what you like.

ChiefRocka 08-05-2009 06:36 AM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by aerotruk63 (Post 3447002)
"63" is there any year better? Good luck with your truck.

So far haven't found one....The 63's are in a class all there own. Old-school looking dash/windshield and OG grill.

First for coils and common chassis.

4,5,6....they are all the same !!

1Bad62Pro/Street 08-05-2009 10:17 AM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Nice '63! Keep us posted!

Craven Moorhead 08-10-2009 12:44 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
I found a guy with a stock pile of 71/72 rear ends, anything in particular to look for? I want a posi unit but they are all sealed and he does not want me to open them up. Anyone have any part numbers I could identify them by?
Thanks

BC Pappy 08-10-2009 05:44 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joemomma1 (Post 3448217)
Well you obviously have no sense of taste nor have you ever had the pleasure of owning a 64-66. You just gave the 2 reasons (dash, winshield) why the 60-63 are stupid ugly. Now dont take this as an attack I was just answering a question. I will now state the obvious, all that matters is what you like.

I totally agree! I love my '65. It is the only year for me. But I appreciate the style and character of all vintage trucks! :chevy:

aerotruk63 08-11-2009 06:10 AM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
If you rotate the yoke on the pinion and the two axels rotate in the same direction it should be a Positraction unit. If they rotate in opposite the direction to each other you have a one wheel wonder.

Craven Moorhead 08-11-2009 08:29 AM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by aerotruk63 (Post 3458275)
If you rotate the yoke on the pinion and the two axels rotate in the same direction it should be a Positraction unit. If they rotate in opposite the direction to each other you have a one wheel wonder.

I thought that was the case on a locker I did not know if it was the same for a posi unit due to the clutches.
Thanks

Craven Moorhead 08-21-2009 04:36 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Picked up a 71/72 rear end for it today 100 bucks. I found a guy with a stock pile of Chevy truck parts. He said many of the yards scrapped everything when scrap was high he kept it all.

1Bad62Pro/Street 08-21-2009 04:41 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
what's the lenght?

Craven Moorhead 08-21-2009 05:50 PM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Approximately 58.5" axle flange to axle flange, the vin says its a 72 3.07:1 open. Nothing special but it is all there in good condition.

Captainfab 08-22-2009 12:13 AM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
That doesn't sound right. It should be right at 63 1/2" IIRC


Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Moorhead (Post 3477255)
Approximately 58.5" axle flange to axle flange, the vin says its a 72 3.07:1 open. Nothing special but it is all there in good condition.


Craven Moorhead 08-22-2009 10:35 AM

Re: 63 C 10 it begins
 
Where exactly are you measuring and I will measure it again, I measured from the axle tube flange to axle tube flange to 58.5" I get 63.625" drum face to drum face.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com