![]() |
Rear Suspension Opinions
My '84 when purchased already had shackles and hangers for a 4" drop. I want it at least another 3" lower (it can be more)to tuck the 31" tires.
I already have purchased new Caltracs for non flip but I can change that easily they said. I am considerling lowering leaf springs as to a flip kit since I already have 4". I want the best set up for straight line traction. I would like your opinions.... It will have around 850hp on the street and more at the track. I am not currently considering a 4 link or ladder bar at this time. |
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I'd consider the 4link and beafing the frame. Oh yeah a roll cage too:tim:
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
triangulated 4-link is my opinion. |
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
For that kind of power, you really do need to look into some frame reinforcements and a 4-link set-up. You will have a very hard time getting any of that power to the ground otherwise. Staying with leaves will probably give you a lot of axle wind-up, and lead to broken rear axles as well.
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
got any pics of this truck? and specs on the motor
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
Twin 76mm Turbos running E85. Complete Aeromotive Fuel System with -10 supply and -10 return All I need to purchase now is a $3000 Turbo 400 and converter LOL I'll work on getting pictures. Right now it just has the GM crate 290 horse engine and a turbo 350. This will do me until paint and suspension gets Ironed out. My point of my post is that I KNOW that the Caltracs will hold up under some high horse power leaf spring cars. I was just curios which may be better for traction. Flipped or not. I asked Scott at Caltrac and he said either way, but you know how that goes... |
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
There is a bit of planning and testing that will need to go into either set-up. I wouldn't say that either is a "plug-n-play" type of thing, and will require proper chassis set-up. Those guys that are running 8's on DR's with CalTracs did NOT just slap them on and run. I can assure you of that.
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
He ran really low 60'... but I cannot remember how low? Anyway I asked him about his setup, and he said non-flipped worked best and having his pinion angle at -4.0° I cannot remember his name... I'll see if i can find a video... that thing left hard We definitely need pics of the twins :metal::metal: |
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I'm running the Western Chassis drop leaves with a stock 350. They are only 2 or 3 leaves thick, if that matters.
Slonaker |
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Thanks for the replies.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I found It
Thanks for the help 1984 GMC stock suspension, 396 small block with a Bowtie Overdrive 700r4 with a Moser Dana 60 rear-end 4.11 gear, and CalTracs bars for suspension help. 1.36 60ft with M/T Drag Radials, 10.3 @129 on pump gas and 150 shot. ( by the way 4500lbs street truck) http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a48...i/myersGMC.jpg |
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I recall seeing that truck run...that thing hauls...
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
with that much HP a 4 link will be you best bet, far more tuneable than any other option. other options can be made to work, but nothen beat's a "good" 4 link in a drag race application.
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I'll be getting rid of my brand new KP 4-link, never opened, if interested.
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com