The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Rear Suspension Opinions (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=456342)

Magnimike1 03-30-2011 06:27 PM

Rear Suspension Opinions
 
My '84 when purchased already had shackles and hangers for a 4" drop. I want it at least another 3" lower (it can be more)to tuck the 31" tires.

I already have purchased new Caltracs for non flip but I can change that easily they said.

I am considerling lowering leaf springs as to a flip kit since I already have 4".

I want the best set up for straight line traction. I would like your opinions....

It will have around 850hp on the street and more at the track.

I am not currently considering a 4 link or ladder bar at this time.

1LowToy 03-30-2011 07:07 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
I'd consider the 4link and beafing the frame. Oh yeah a roll cage too:tim:

Altec 03-30-2011 07:15 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1LowToy (Post 4589396)
I'd consider the 4link and beafing the frame. Oh yeah a roll cage too:tim:

This. 800+ horses through a low rider leaf setup is going to do nothing but wrap your axle, and break drive shafts.


triangulated 4-link is my opinion.

Non_Sequitor 03-30-2011 07:15 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
For that kind of power, you really do need to look into some frame reinforcements and a 4-link set-up. You will have a very hard time getting any of that power to the ground otherwise. Staying with leaves will probably give you a lot of axle wind-up, and lead to broken rear axles as well.

jrcaprai 03-30-2011 08:07 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Non_Sequitor (Post 4589415)
For that kind of power, you really do need to look into some frame reinforcements and a 4-link set-up. You will have a very hard time getting any of that power to the ground otherwise. Staying with leaves will probably give you a lot of axle wind-up, and lead to broken rear axles as well.

Caltracs will take care of that... they are doing well behind 1500 HP Stock suspended X275 Cars

3r!c84 03-30-2011 08:19 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
got any pics of this truck? and specs on the motor

bigblockrock 03-30-2011 08:43 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrcaprai (Post 4589506)
Caltracs will take care of that... they are doing well behind 1500 HP Stock suspended X275 Cars

x2 for caltracs. X275 cars are going bottom 8s on stock style suspension and a 275 drag radial. I'd do a flip kit and maybe some split mono leafs. Calvert can build those for your application. Add some double adjustable shocks and youll hook on dirt!:metal:

Magnimike1 03-30-2011 10:21 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 3r!c84 (Post 4589525)
got any pics of this truck? and specs on the motor

The motor is a Dart block 377, with Trickflow 215 heads, Victor Jr. intake and a Quick Fuel 750 blow through carb.

Twin 76mm Turbos running E85.

Complete Aeromotive Fuel System with -10 supply and -10 return

All I need to purchase now is a $3000 Turbo 400 and converter LOL

I'll work on getting pictures. Right now it just has the GM crate 290 horse engine and a turbo 350. This will do me until paint and suspension gets Ironed out.

My point of my post is that I KNOW that the Caltracs will hold up under some high horse power leaf spring cars. I was just curios which may be better for traction. Flipped or not. I asked Scott at Caltrac and he said either way, but you know how that goes...

Non_Sequitor 03-31-2011 10:10 AM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
There is a bit of planning and testing that will need to go into either set-up. I wouldn't say that either is a "plug-n-play" type of thing, and will require proper chassis set-up. Those guys that are running 8's on DR's with CalTracs did NOT just slap them on and run. I can assure you of that.

jrcaprai 03-31-2011 11:58 AM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnimike1 (Post 4589908)
The motor is a Dart block 377, with Trickflow 215 heads, Victor Jr. intake and a Quick Fuel 750 blow through carb.

Twin 76mm Turbos running E85.

Complete Aeromotive Fuel System with -10 supply and -10 return

All I need to purchase now is a $3000 Turbo 400 and converter LOL

I'll work on getting pictures. Right now it just has the GM crate 290 horse engine and a turbo 350. This will do me until paint and suspension gets Ironed out.

My point of my post is that I KNOW that the Caltracs will hold up under some high horse power leaf spring cars. I was just curios which may be better for traction. Flipped or not. I asked Scott at Caltrac and he said either way, but you know how that goes...

I used to talk to a guy that had a 396 sbc that ran a 175 HP Hit... he had stock springs, Non-flipped Axle, Caltracs, and the Rancho 9000 shocks that Calverts sells... he was running bottom 10's and used a trans brake...
He ran really low 60'... but I cannot remember how low?
Anyway I asked him about his setup, and he said non-flipped worked best and having his pinion angle at -4.0°
I cannot remember his name... I'll see if i can find a video... that thing left hard

We definitely need pics of the twins :metal::metal:

Slonaker 03-31-2011 01:06 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
I'm running the Western Chassis drop leaves with a stock 350. They are only 2 or 3 leaves thick, if that matters.

Slonaker

Magnimike1 03-31-2011 04:15 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Thanks for the replies.
Posted via Mobile Device

jrcaprai 03-31-2011 07:19 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
I found It

Thanks for the help 1984 GMC stock suspension, 396 small block with a Bowtie Overdrive 700r4 with a Moser Dana 60 rear-end
4.11 gear, and CalTracs bars for suspension help. 1.36 60ft with M/T Drag Radials, 10.3 @129 on pump gas and 150 shot.
( by the way 4500lbs street truck)

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a48...i/myersGMC.jpg

Magnimike1 03-31-2011 07:51 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrcaprai (Post 4591695)
I found It

Thanks for the help 1984 GMC stock suspension, 396 small block with a Bowtie Overdrive 700r4 with a Moser Dana 60 rear-end
4.11 gear, and CalTracs bars for suspension help. 1.36 60ft with M/T Drag Radials, 10.3 @129 on pump gas and 150 shot.
( by the way 4500lbs street truck)

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a48...i/myersGMC.jpg

Very nice
Posted via Mobile Device

Pop's C-10 03-31-2011 08:11 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
I recall seeing that truck run...that thing hauls...

Magnimike1 03-31-2011 09:32 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Non_Sequitor (Post 4590748)
There is a bit of planning and testing that will need to go into either set-up. I wouldn't say that either is a "plug-n-play" type of thing, and will require proper chassis set-up. Those guys that are running 8's on DR's with CalTracs did NOT just slap them on and run. I can assure you of that.

Anyone with common sense should know that, but I appreciate your input nonetheless.

Non_Sequitor 04-01-2011 09:57 AM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnimike1 (Post 4592009)
Anyone with common sense should know that, but I appreciate your input nonetheless.

I honestly didn't mean to state the obvious, but sometimes sense isn't quite so common. Cheers!:o

jitteryguy 04-01-2011 10:30 AM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
with that much HP a 4 link will be you best bet, far more tuneable than any other option. other options can be made to work, but nothen beat's a "good" 4 link in a drag race application.

Puglia10 04-01-2011 11:53 AM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
I'll be getting rid of my brand new KP 4-link, never opened, if interested.

Magnimike1 04-01-2011 12:02 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jitteryguy (Post 4593113)
with that much HP a 4 link will be you best bet, far more tuneable than any other option. other options can be made to work, but nothen beat's a "good" 4 link in a drag race application.

I agree. It will have to come with CONTINUAL upgrades (lol). I am still trying to get out of hock after buying the fuel system, electronic boost controller and the Digital 7 plus igniton set-up. Whew! :chevy:

Magnimike1 04-01-2011 12:03 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Puglia10 (Post 4593288)
I'll be getting rid of my brand new KP 4-link, never opened, if interested.

Link to set-up?

Puglia10 04-04-2011 03:10 PM

Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
 
here it is
http://*******************/4-link-kit...ize-4-link-kit


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com