![]() |
Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
I just sent this same question to Nate as well but i'd like to hear thoughts from
all the suspension gurus. I just ordered a complete front and rear dropmember touring setup yesterday. I ordered the 4 link setup. I am having second thoughts on the rear and wondering if trailing arms might be a better route. I want a very low static ride height with the best handling and ride quality as possible. I am running a Ls3 that has a cam and some tuning. I would guess right at 500 horse power. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
My front dropmember and rear 4 link setup fron Nate is scheduled to arrive Tuesday via the big brown truck. I went with the 4 link as well for the rear. To me it is lighter, easier to adjust for pinion angle, makes for alot more room in the middle of the frame, as I plan on doing the bracing he has shown on one of his chassis with a four link. Plus as an added benefit, I think it looks better. What do you have for specific concerns about the 4 link rear?
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
I read in a post that Nate prefers the trailing arms to the 4link unless you are making serious power. It got me questioning the pros and cons of each.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Quote:
The truck arms allow for a larger/wider set-up. Truck arms are also longer & the longer the bar, the better the ride quality (even when comparing different 4-bar set-ups). |
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Running 10 wide now would like to run 12.
Do trailing arms ride noticeably better? Does either setup corner better than the other? Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Quote:
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Anyone have any update on this or additional info? I have the same question and am trying to decide which direction to go. Any help???
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
5 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
That's about the power that I'll be at with the motor. Would like to spray it at some point but need to get the traction figured out first. Looks like you had trac bars from ridetech? I'll have the boys tank behind the axel and battery relocated to the back. We were able to set the Motor and trans back 3-4" and the 4l80 moved some of the weight a little farther back too.
What's your thought on 4 link vs the bars? Any other ideas to get it to hook? I've always heard those MT tires look cool but don't hook very well. I intend to do a mini tub to fit 345/30/20 under there. Guess I can get another set of rear wheels for some slicks too. |
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Boyd not boys
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Quote:
Rob |
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
I was looking g at porterbuilts stuff too. Think the touring set up is what I like. Already have ridetech control arms and plan on doing adjustable height coil overs. I need to do a little more reading. I'll check out those builds.
Also I'll get back with you soon on that bracket. Probably going to need one. Thanks. |
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
I'm not sure if I'm going to hookup well or not, but I went with Porterbuilt's trailing arm setup. I will also be running their inner frame stiffener, Ridetech HQ shocks and on air. Having the ability to set the pinion angle with their TA crossmember ought to help. However I will only be running 400-450 to the wheels (est.).
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Quote:
|
Re: Porterbuilt 4 link or trailing arms
Anyone else have any experience or info. I'm trying to decide which route to go also.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com