The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   1966 service id label glovebox lets see them (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=548895)

yelmer 10-23-2012 06:39 PM

1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
3 Attachment(s)
lets see the labels what options are out there

oem4me 10-23-2012 07:41 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
1 Attachment(s)
Mine is a good one for those who don't like to read. :lol:

theastronaut 10-24-2012 12:46 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
http://i557.photobucket.com/albums/s..._1868177_n.jpg

flips72 10-24-2012 04:58 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
i didnt even know these trucks came with them, i thought they started in 67,cool post thanks.

Clyde65 10-24-2012 05:53 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
OEM4me, what does "engine conversion" mean?

bonehead 10-24-2012 08:36 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
My sticker is all smeared up and almost impossible to read, but here is what I could make out on it.

PAINT: 530

Z62AA CUSTOM GROUP
Z53AB AMP METER OIL GAUGE
Z61AF CUSTOM GROUP

B98AA SIDE TRIM MOLDING EQ
C41AL THRIFT AIR HEATER
V37EA CHROME BUMPER FRT & R

yelmer 10-27-2012 11:31 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
2 Attachment(s)
more

yelmer 10-27-2012 11:36 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
on the engine conversion. do you know where your truck was shipped to? i had that on my 66 cc ship to denver. i thought it might be a jet change in the carb due to high alitude ? does anybody have a 327 shipped to cailf. i was wondering if your oil cap is push on or twist on with a hose ?

oem4me 10-28-2012 12:56 AM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yelmer (Post 5672010)
on the engine conversion. do you know where your truck was shipped to? i had that on my 66 cc ship to denver. i thought it might be a jet change in the carb due to high alitude ? does anybody have a 327 shipped to cailf. i was wondering if your oil cap is push on or twist on with a hose ?

According to another member more knowledgeable than myself, the "engine conversion" pertains to smog equipment adaptations on Fremont, CA built trucks depending upon where the truck was headed. Mine went to Enumclaw, WA.

yelmer 10-28-2012 09:00 AM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
do youknow what was on the smog truck? the denver truck i had looked like all the others i have had? well i hope we find out what it was . they had some weird stuff

VictoriaHardware 11-25-2012 12:25 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
Regarding the "Engine Conversion" , I have a '66 C10 with a 292 Built in Fremont and delivered to a California dealer. It does not have any "engine conversion" listed on the glove box, but does list "K19XM Exhaust Emission Eq" . The engine compartment is unmolested and still has the AIR pump on it.

VictoriaHardware 11-25-2012 12:48 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
1 Attachment(s)
Here's my '66 C10 Suburban

oem4me 11-25-2012 12:52 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VictoriaHardware (Post 5721706)
Regarding the "Engine Conversion" , I have a '66 C10 with a 292 Built in Fremont and delivered to a California dealer. It does not have any "engine conversion" listed on the glove box, but does list "K19XM Exhaust Emission Eq" . The engine compartment is unmolested and still has the AIR pump on it.

So, does it make sense to say that if the Fremont, CA built trucks were delivered to CA dealers, then the smog equip was standard, but if shipped to other states that did not have smog requirements, then the "engine conversion" was essentially removing all smog stuff?

VictoriaHardware 11-25-2012 03:05 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
I think it's true that back then ANY vehicle delivered to CA had extra emissions equipment, regardless of where it was built. The law didn't state HOW to meet the requirement, but AIR was the most common way. It seems backwards that AIR would be considered standard, and they would "remove" it from 90% of the vehicles.

So... I'm still not sure what Z20 Engine Conversion refers to. Comparing SPIDs the exact verbage for the same RPO is sometimes different from Plant to Plant and Year to Year. Was Z20 a Fremont-only option? This is gonna need more examples to figure out.

gmcdeadhead 11-25-2012 04:37 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
heres my 1966 c-20. [IMG]http://i792.photobucket.com/albums/y...d/100_0082.jpghttp://i792.photobucket.com/albums/y...d/100_0080.jpg[/IMG]

yelmer 11-25-2012 05:15 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
I have a 66 chevy truck c-20 shipped to cailf. No smog equip. Original truck . But does have closed engine pos. Vent option k24ed

VictoriaHardware 12-09-2012 04:14 PM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
2 Attachment(s)
Regarding RPO Z20 Engine Conversion Equipment, this is in the 1966 Assembly Manual. It did several things-

(1) Threaded plugs were installed where the AIR tubes would go into the head
(2) Thermostat was replaced, presumably with a different opening temperature
(3) On L6 engines, the oil fill cap was replaced with a screw-on, non-vented one and a hole was plugged with a grommet
(4) It also concerns the distributor but pages A3 & A4 are missing

Attachment 1024287 Attachment 1024288

So -
• Apparently ’66 was the first year for this option
• It applied to all engines for CK10, 20, 30, and P10, L6 and V8 (???)
• K19 (Air Injection Reactor) and Z20 were mutually exclusive
• There’s no indication this was Fremont-only

There’s a lot left to understand here. Not sure why this was needed.

yelmer 07-19-2016 08:53 AM

Re: 1966 service id label glovebox lets see them
 
so they have another type of conversion interesting thanks for the additional info


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com