![]() |
2500HD rear shocks
Hello first time poster here - I have an '02 2500 HD, 8.1/Allison, 180,000+ miles, mostly stock except front leveling kit & 295/70/17's on American wheels. I went to replace the rear shocks today with a pair of Bilstien 5100's I bought a couple years ago when I refurbished the front suspension & added leveling kit.
When I pulled the original Bilstein F4-BE5-6082-H0 & compared to the new one, the old shock was roughly 1.5" longer extended. I checked the 5100 part #24-186742 is correct for this truck. The original Bilstein part number has been updated to 24-060820. This shock has basically the same extended length as the new 5100. So, should I use the new though somewhat shorter shock or find a longer one? Sorry for the lengthy post, hope it makes sense. |
Re: 2500HD rear shocks
Are they close or the same when compressed?
|
Re: 2500HD rear shocks
Unfortunately I didn't measure that before I reinstalled. I did measure the shock body on both as best as I could & they seemed essentially the same at just under 14".
I randomly looked at Gabriel shocks & those are about 3/4" longer fully extended than the Bilstein for the 2500HD, for what thats worth. |
Re: 2500HD rear shocks
I think I'd worry more about bottoming the shock pistons from having "too long" shocks.
You'd need to be airborne or on a lift to get the shocks to full extension. You don't drive on a lift and I hope you don't go sailing through the air like the Dukes of Hazard. I think that new ones being 1-1/2" shorter means they will not bottom as easily as the old shocks. Maybe someone else will chime in with other thoughts but that's my $0.02. |
Re: 2500HD rear shocks
I ended up getting the Bilstein shocks 5100 because my rig is leveled. The yellow Bilstein HD's are shorter and designed for bone stock trucks.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com