![]() |
Someone say Gulstrand???
https://i.imgur.com/eMWbqvZ.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/3c9RMDm.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/Z2k87H9.jpeg Dick Gulstrand is a genius. Typically its 4 holes to legendary, but the stamping is a bit different here. |
Re: Someone say Gulstrand???
We went up with the upper.
2° camber change thru the travel. Looks like you might have some undesirable camber changes |
Re: Someone say Gulstrand???
It is slightly more then a regular Gulstrand mod, and close to the improved version.
Last time I did it. It worked pretty well. The 2nd part of the Gulstrand mod is moving the Upper a arm back will be accomplished by moving the lower arm forward. As per the typical C10 way. If not there is not mix up a grinder can't fix up. |
Re: Someone say Gulstrand???
Why not just add a taller upper ball joint for the same effect?
With 1" narrowed arms (quicker angle change for more camber gain) and .50" taller upper ball joints my C10 had -1.6 degrees gain per inch of travel compared to -.86 per inch stock. You also gain camber when turning with a lot of caster so you may want to map out exactly how much camber gain you're getting to see if you actually need that much. |
Re: Someone say Gulstrand???
Quote:
As for the mod. I think of it as the icing on the cake of the traditional mod of moving the lower A arm forward. Needed no, but adds a little bit of confidence to the end off tire grip or your limits. What ever happens first. I want to learn how to measure suspension gains one day. My uncle gave me a old kit he had for rebuilding rear ends. Which has the guage to measure the run out is it? Plus I have another C20 crossmember I will mod, rebuild, and store for my future square body Suburban or crew cab. I need a matching pair. Come to think of it. I like pairs of other things too. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com