View Single Post
Old 10-22-2007, 11:38 AM   #15
Zoomad75
K5Camper
 
Zoomad75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,513
Re: Aluminum vs. Iron intake

Look at it this way, with a stock cam, an aftermarket performance aluminum intake is just able to get more air into the engine right? But if you don't have a cam to match it, the total performance gains if the intake will be limited by the stock cam.

On the mild 350 in my Nova I noticed good seat of the pants difference between the stock iron intake with a qjet to a Edelbrock performer with a holley. But in my case I'm running a factory L-79 cam (from the 350hp/327) so it's a little more aggressive than the stock cams that came in most of them. The 350 ran well with the iron intake and q-jet, but it woke UP with the performer and the holley.


I'd say if the cam is stock, swapping to a performance aluminum intake isn't going to gain you all that much.
__________________
Rob Z.
1975 K5 350/465/205/D44/12b 4" lift on 35's- RIP
1991 K5 8.1L/NV4500/241/D44/14b FWC Camper
Zoomad75 is offline   Reply With Quote