Re: Strong Arms (tubular) vs. Stock A arm
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrerunnerRob
I thought about the shortening the lower instead of lengthing the upper before, and the only thing I could come up with was having to do with steering components. At some point you will just run out of steering tie rod adjustment, and by lengthening the uppers you are placing the spindle back into the vertical plane(when viewed from the front ) that it was previously in. I guess you could manufacture a shorter outer tie rod end, but his would add to the cost of a kit. Just my ideas on this, but maybe I am missing something entirely.
|
I'm not talking about narrowing the track width 2"..... that might cause issues. I'm saying narrow the lowers however much the uppers are being lengthened to avoid adding those pesky "extra shims" (.500 ~.750"??).
This would keep track width right around stock.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG
Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....
Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
|