Thread: '88 350 tbi.
View Single Post
Old 09-05-2009, 07:49 PM   #12
Lugnut64052
Middle-aged Curmudgeon
 
Lugnut64052's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 753
Re: '88 350 tbi.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68gmsee View Post
Why does the TBI suck? I had thought about maybe going that route...
TBI doesn't suck at all. It's a simple, reliable, injection setup that worked very well on millions of GM cars and trucks from the late '80's to the mid 90's. 4-cylinder and 6-cylinder versions powered bazillions of granny sedans and chick cars through that period also.

Cold start in the winter time is great, driveability is excellent, and they get reasonable mileage. Given an equivalent amount of experience with TBI and with carbs, it's easier to diagnose, sort out and fix a TBI problem than a carb/ignition/tuning problem (in my opinion).

True, you can't build a 700 horse, fire-breathing engine with a TBI setup, but for basic daily-driver operation they're hard to beat.

True, there's not nearly as much "bling" or "wow" factor as with a chromed-up race engine, but to each his own. I enjoy a well-tuned Q-jet. Have on on my '72 at the moment, in fact. But basic TBI sure is nice . . . . .
__________________
Bret

Check out the site's Truck Tech FAQ.
Be a site supporter.
My more-or-less pathetic build thread.

Board members I've met:
------------------------------
Longhorn Man
Dieselwrencher
jholley
big mike71
Lugnut64052 is offline   Reply With Quote