Re: Less costly front suspension
Quote:
Originally Posted by blazerboy72
I hope 1/4" isnt too thick. This thing may weight a ton. I'm thinking 3/16" might have been better.
|
3/16" would have been the better option for cost & weight savings.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG
Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....
Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
|