The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network - View Single Post

vin63 · 11-24-2010, 09:49 PM

My 60-foot ETs remained pretty close to the same (averaged ~1.36), but I was also on a Pro-type transbrake. You hit the nail on the head...the critical variable in this is the torque converter. My SBC made peak torque between 6000-6500 rpms, so my converter was tailored to a 6500 rpm launch. If your previous converter was not allowing you to reach peak torque, then it will be difficult to compare. From the sound of it, a looser converter that stalls closer to your torque band will definitely help you.

11-24-2010, 09:49 PM	#6
vin63 It's Better With Nitro Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Chino Hills, CA Posts: 2,262	Re: Going glide... My 60-foot ETs remained pretty close to the same (averaged ~1.36), but I was also on a Pro-type transbrake. You hit the nail on the head...the critical variable in this is the torque converter. My SBC made peak torque between 6000-6500 rpms, so my converter was tailored to a 6500 rpm launch. If your previous converter was not allowing you to reach peak torque, then it will be difficult to compare. From the sound of it, a looser converter that stalls closer to your torque band will definitely help you. __________________ 1963 C-10: Deluxe-optioned cab, shortbed, fleetside Pontiac 462 ci, Kauffman D-Port alum. heads 4L80E, narrowed sheetmetal Ford 9-inch Tubular front and rear suspension Custom 6-piston front disc and 4-piston rear disc brakes