View Single Post
Old 08-09-2003, 12:03 AM   #12
apstguy
LED King
 
apstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,087
[QUOTE]Originally posted by crossy
Quote:
Originally posted by swervin ervin
but I've been wrong before.

I didn't think any 81-86 1/2 ton pickups had the option for a 350, not even Cali. I knew this changed in 87.but I've been wrong before.

OK mike I changed the way your quote read a bit but I never added anything:-)
the LS9 350 was actually an emissions option 350 for Calif. only. It was a LOW compression 350 rated a whopping 5 HP more than the 305 but did it at 600 lower RPM it was also 30 more foot Lbs. of torque. I've only seen it in ONE of ALL the trucks/blazers I've had . DAVE
I live in California and have never seen an original '80s 350 in a 1/2 ton. Must have cost ALOT of money and probably had extra emissions crap on it!
__________________
Tyler

1985 C10 305 w/ Bowtie OD TH700R4 3.42 LSD 202,000 miles
2006 Ford Focus ZX3 5-speed Stick
2016 Chevy Spark EV
Gone: 2002.5 VW GTI 24v VR6
Gone: 2008 VW R32
apstguy is offline   Reply With Quote