The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network - View Single Post

Dean23 · 09-04-2003, 08:02 PM

Well the idea behind a hydraulic rooler is that there is less friction, so that means faster valvetrain responses and more power. I want to go with the afr heads because they flow an insane amount. my guy at extreme said the edelbrocks are good, but the afr's flow way better. The afr heads have bigger intake runners and outperform most other heads.

I believe the guy he is a true gear head. Thes have built a 469 in a 70 malibu that runs 11.40"s and is on 8.5 to 1 compression.

09-04-2003, 08:02 PM	#19
Dean23 68cst_ss490 Join Date: May 2001 Location: edmonton,canada Posts: 1,363	Well the idea behind a hydraulic rooler is that there is less friction, so that means faster valvetrain responses and more power. I want to go with the afr heads because they flow an insane amount. my guy at extreme said the edelbrocks are good, but the afr's flow way better. The afr heads have bigger intake runners and outperform most other heads. I believe the guy he is a true gear head. Thes have built a 469 in a 70 malibu that runs 11.40"s and is on 8.5 to 1 compression. __________________ Dean edmonton,canada a winter wonderland 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche LT cold air intake, performance exhaust, Comp cams cam, jba shorty ceramic headers. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3090973