Re: Anyone use Edelbrock's Universal EFI Sump system?
A little expensive, agreed, although not that bad once you start to add up the costs associated with modifying the stock tank, plus an external pump. I liked the idea for two main reasons:
1. No return to the tank. I figure this would majorly decrease the likelihood of gas fumes in the cab, since it seems like once you begin to pressurize the tank with any sort of return, most people have fumes issues.
2. No fuel starvation issues at low fuel levels, under hard cornering, etc., without a baffled or sumped tank. Also, it seems like a lot of folks using in-line pumps with the stock supply line burn through pumps since they have to pull fuel up, over, and out - and the only way to solve this with the stock tank is to modify it for a bottom feed. Or, go for a system like this Edelbrock one.
I know those things can be solved by moving the tank to the rear, but that's just not an option right now...
Open to other suggestions or critiques, although I've researched a whole ton of ways other folks have done it. I'd really love it if someone had used the system, but it seems as if it's a pretty new product.
__________________
1972 K10 Cheyenne Super | LWB, fleetside | 350/350/205 | KEEPER
1971 K10 Cheyenne | SWB, fleetside | LS Swap 5.3/4L60 | SOLD
1976 Trans Am | 400/4-spd | SOLD
1976 Trans Am | 455/4-spd | TOTALED
|