The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network - View Single Post

**Palf70Step** · 04-06-2014, 08:35 AM

I chose the 260 HP version because it made it's power and torque at a slightly lower RPM than the 290 hp version. To me that sounded better for a truck than power & torque at higher RPM. I have not been disappointed with it. Even with the 2.7x rear in my 83, it hauls.

04-06-2014, 08:35 AM	#15
Palf70Step State of Confusion! Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Gulfport, MS USA Posts: 47,491	Re: 290 HP 350 anyone used before? I chose the 260 HP version because it made it's power and torque at a slightly lower RPM than the 290 hp version. To me that sounded better for a truck than power & torque at higher RPM. I have not been disappointed with it. Even with the 2.7x rear in my 83, it hauls. __________________ Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!