View Single Post
Old 04-10-2014, 05:30 PM   #13
OKGMC4
Registered User
 
OKGMC4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 1,230
Re: Anyone using Doug Thorley 323Y-C headers?

I've heard that about losing bottom end power but if you believe what this CarCraft article says, it looks like there is very little difference in reality. According to the article there was very little change from vette manifolds to 1 5/8, 1 3/4, or even 1 7/8 headers. Of course that is on a bone stock LS1. So, it may stand to reason that an LS with ported heads and some cam may see more gain...but at the same time it didn't see any real loss under the curve.

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...e_header_test/

I pan on doing cnc ported heads and a Lingenfelter cam and don't want to feel like I left any on the table with this engine. My 56 is all stock and has the vette manifolds and I know it runs well, but the power is lacking IMHO. I am amazed how many people see the 5.3 in there and say "wow, I bet it's fast!" and internally I'm shaking my head. I want my 69 to outrun my 56 with one arm tied behind it's back when it's done. It will have more engine, more gear, more stall, and bigger exhaust. Can't go wrong with that recipe, can I?
__________________
56 GMC BUILD THREAD:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=368649

69 long bed Chevy turned 67 gmc jimmy roadster:
https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=851167
OKGMC4 is offline   Reply With Quote