View Single Post
Old 02-10-2016, 03:20 PM   #28
davepl
Registered User
 
davepl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,334
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRed76 View Post
Fuel injection with no cats will do you better than carbureted with cats.
Not actually. I have all three:

- Carb'd car with a cat ('75 Monte factory)
- Carb'd truck with no cat ('70 GMC)
- EFI car with no cat ('69 Camaro ZZ502 BS3 Sequential EFI)

The EFI car still smells like raw gas. It runs at about 14.6:1, but to get near stoich at idle with a cam in a motor like these requires a lot of extra fuel that winds up getting in your girlfriend's hair.

Now a poorly tuned car with cats will stink like sulfur dioxide, so there's no substitute for properly tuning the thing. But properly tuned, cats get rid of the raw fuel smell.

Maybe if gasoline still smelled like it did in 1970 I'd be OK with it, but it doesn't.
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible
davepl is offline   Reply With Quote