Thread: cpp suspension
View Single Post
Old 12-23-2018, 10:14 PM   #7
chevy_mike
Never Ending Projects
 
chevy_mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,836
Re: cpp suspension

I have used both CPP and Early Classic Enterprise (ECE) and hands down, the ECE parts are much nicer and better quality control. I have had issues with a rear track bar (the arm mounting hole for the bar was too close to a weld and could not use a standard nut provided, had to get a flange nut that had a smaller nut size), brake calipers leaking, bad power booster new out of the box, rear springs that were a 4" drop actually end up at 6-7" drop (which I just replaced with ECE springs and got the exact drop). All of these issues were new out of the box issues. I have had zero issues with any ECE parts I have bought over the years. I am on Nova and Tri-5 boards and lots of issues with CPP part as well, so not just truck stuff. Heck CPP finally recalled their Tri-5 steering arm because they were breaking and you lost all steering. Luckily all the ones I read about were at slow, parking lot speeds so no one got hurt.

Take you chances....
__________________
.
1965 C10 Panel, Tiki Express http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=506580 SOLD
1968 Chevy C10, Long, Fleetside, Hot Rod Hauler http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=313233 SOLD
1965 Chevy C10, Long, Fleetside, Hot Rod C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=415702 SOLD


We were given two ears and one mouth for a reason... listen twice as much and speak half as often...
chevy_mike is offline   Reply With Quote