Quote:
|
Originally Posted by da-burb
I say yes, because you are not changing the position of the actual location of the pads that the helper springs contact. It should be trailing arm, overload bracket, shock bracket, lowering block, axle. Installed this way the only thing that changes is the axle is 2" higher.
|
Agreed, but aren't the helper springs designed to help overload conditions when the rear is squatted down? (read this as decreased frame to axle distance). If you've decreased this distance under a no-load condition, won't you be pushing suspension travel limits if you subsequently load it enough for the helpers to work? That is why I say the 2 objectives are incongruent. It not a matter of can't but why?
__________________
Currently on or near the homestead:
67 Chevy SWB 2WD stepside 350/3 on tree (Pat's)
67 GMC SWB 2WD Fleet 402/auto (Brian's under construction)
67 Chevy 3/4 ton 2WD 402/auto (Business Hauler)
67 Chevy 1 ton dually 2WD 396/4 speed (Former business hauler, Needs TLC)
68 Chevy 1/2 ton Suburban 2WD 250 six/3 on tree (Brian's Needs TLC)
70 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD 350/4 speed (Pat's - Disguised as a 68 GMC)
71 Chevy SWB stepside (Crushed by tree - parts donor)
72 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD (Parts donor)
72 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD Suburban (Parts Donor)
72 GMC 3/4 ton 4WD 292 six/4 speed (Mine - Disguised as a 67 GMC)
81 GMC 4WD Dually Dump Body 350/4 speed (Business Hauler)
82 Camaro Z/28 355/Super T-10 (Pat's toy)
93 Caprice 9C1 (Brian's Cop Car)
02 Toyota Camry (Reliable but a souless steel and plastic hulk)
2011 2SS RS Camaro M6 Factory Hurst Shifter 
Maybe I need to sell some of this crap 
Yet another Bozo with a sawz-all
|