|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
10-08-2024, 03:48 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,027
|
Re: 1966 C10 Long to Short Frame... ready to start cutting
There's no difference on a 63-66 frame vs a 67-72 frame as far as shortening is concerned.
I shortened a '68 lwb frame to use under my '64. I had to relocate the rear cab mounts; the radiator/core support mounts, & front frame ends (for the diff shaped earlier model bumper) because of the later frame but the shortening efforts/dimensions were no different.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
