![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Des Moines, Ia
Posts: 3,233
|
heres one for you guys with inline 6s
i am wanting to know what kind of gas milage are you getting, i have to go to college soon and need to get something that gets better gas milage than my 350 but i want a classic prefferably another truck like the one i have.
__________________
Krazy Texan My Trucks are made with Wrenches not Chop Sticks 1967 GMC 3/4 ton "Johnny Cash" 1990 v1500 suburban 1967 Ford f100 Swb 4x4 "green bean" GOD BLESS JESUS, JOHN WAYNE, AND THE ALAMO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kelowna B.C. Canada
Posts: 2,048
|
hey crazy texan how about a propane conversion, those kits a cheap used, or like I said car pool
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
|
My 350 Burb is now getting 16-17 mpg. You can get a fuel efficient V-8. With propane you will actually get about 10-20 Percent worse mileage, but it usually is cheaper depending on where you buy it. Now I have heard that if you "fumigate" your gas with propane you can increase a couple of mpg. Im not sure if this is true though.
__________________
Just sitting here contemplating contemplation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Seņor Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
|
Re: heres one for you guys with inline 6s
Quote:
Kenneth
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Robert Olson Transport
![]() Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: recent transplant to NC USA
Posts: 20,345
|
my 76 with the 250 I 6 gets crappy gas mileage used like almost half a tank to drive maybe sixty five miles and thats with a three speed and only one burnout LOL
my motor needs a tune up badly though aint had a chance to work on mine yet.. you know how it goes the shoemakers kid is always the one running around barefoot
__________________
Bob 1951 International running on a squarebody chassis "If a man's worth is judged by the people he associates himself with, then i am the richest man in the world knowing some of the fine people of this board" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a...t.php?f=25&a=9 (you can review the site rules here!) PM Me for your vehicle/parts hauling needs in the North East US or see my Facebook page Robert Olson Transport Live each day to the fullest.. you never know when fate is going to pull the rug out from under you... I hate cancer!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
|
My dad used to have a late 70's C10 with the 250, he said that it got crappy gas mileage, even worse than some of the V8 cars hes had. Those inlines have a really low comp ratio, which may be why. Probably if you built one to run higher comp and a few other doodads, you could get better mileage.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500 ![]() 1996 Honda Accord 2007 Kawasaki KLR 650 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Formerly yellow72custom
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
|
A friend of mine used to have a '71 GMC 1/2 ton with a 250, 3spd on the column, and 3.73 gears, and the best they ever got out of it was 11mpg. The engine had like 260,000 miles on it though. You could proably get you 350 to get a little better mileage. Since you have a 3/4 ton, you proably have 4.10 or lower gears. If you could find a way to put some 3.54-3.07 gears in it, that would give you better mileage on the highway. Also, you said you have a comp cam, how big is it? Anything over a Comp 268 will proably kill your mileage. Jet your carb a bit leaner too, and give the truck a nice tuneup, and you will proably get better mileage than an I6.
BTW, i am in the same boat as you. I am going to college this fall, and i need something that gets better gas mileage than my '72. I was looking on the internet.....and early ninties geo metros are about 1000 bucks, and get 45mpg. I dunno if i could drive one though, they are too small and underpowered, but if push comes to shove i may get one. Then if i don't have to drive my truck every day, i could go wild on the motor (bigger cam, lower gears), but i know i would miss driving it everywhere.
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride. '70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck. '97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
|
Quote:
__________________
1969 GMC K2500 ![]() 1996 Honda Accord 2007 Kawasaki KLR 650 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Cantankerous Geezer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bel Aire, KS
Posts: 6,264
|
There are a lot of variables here. My 74 C-10 bare bones 250/ 3 speed got about 16 after I took off the smog crap and put in a module for pointless ignition. My 80 G-10, with 250/ 3 speed had the integral intake with a two stage two barrel got about 19. Now my 52 with a 235, 4 speed and 4.57 gears only gets around 11. If you want economy, you need a smaller vehicle. At one time I had a Nissan ext-cab with 3.0 L V-6 and 5 speed, it got 22-28 mpg, depending on conditions.
__________________
Fred There is no such thing as too much cam...just not enough engine. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Seņor Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
|
Quote:
![]() Years ago I had a 3 month crunch between building a hotrod and waiting for my new ordered vehicle to arrive. I went to the local Ugly Duckling rental place to rent a cheapo from them but found it it would be cheaper to just buy something. So I became the "proud" owner of a bright blue Pinto hatchback. It was absolutely superb. It was in excellent condition, ran just fine, and it was so absurd for the people who knew me to see my driving it, we all just got a great big kick out of it. And... when my new truck came in, I sold the Pinto to my neighbor for a 50% profit! W00t!
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
14.1 @ 96MPH
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,811
|
You can't really beat a mild 350 with overdrive for mileage in one of these trucks. My 350 with Vortec heads, a 700R4, and 3.73's gets 14mpg, and that's with me cruising fast and 28" tires. If you got a nice mild 350, with either a 700R4 or a 5-speed, and a rear in the 3.42 / 3.73 range, you could probably do that pretty easily as well.
__________________
Project1970 - LS1 Swap Complete! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Newport News, Va
Posts: 230
|
The sunglasses don't help. I have a 95 metro 4door that I drive to work everyday, and it is hard. I only bought it because I was sick of paying for the gas in my Durango and it was really cheap(600). I have heard quite a lot of ridicule from the guys I work with for driving it, but $10 a week compared to $40 keeps me smiling.
__________________
72 cheyenne super |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern Idaho
Posts: 59
|
I've got a 250 I6 in my 72'4x4 with the 4spd and 3:73 gears. Fuel economy sucks. I'm getting around 9-10mpg with the 1 barrel carb. My 71 2wd with it's 307 V8, 3spd tranny, and 4:11 gearing gets around 13mpg with a 2 barrel carb. The 250 I6 for me is just way too under powered for the 72' truck.
__________________
72Chevy swb 4x4 71GMC swb 2x4 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Des Moines, Ia
Posts: 3,233
|
i found something that will be fun to drive and i go to test drive it tomarrow, i found a 75 dj5 postal jeep, cant wait to test drive it
__________________
Krazy Texan My Trucks are made with Wrenches not Chop Sticks 1967 GMC 3/4 ton "Johnny Cash" 1990 v1500 suburban 1967 Ford f100 Swb 4x4 "green bean" GOD BLESS JESUS, JOHN WAYNE, AND THE ALAMO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|