The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-20-2004, 01:06 AM   #1
pphatbasstard
Registered User
 
pphatbasstard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 166
th400 to much for a 350?

I have a th400 behind my 350 and I was told that that transmission was to much for a 350 to get "moving" I guess. I guess I belive this person because as soon as I take my foot off the gas my truck slows reallly realllly quick doesnt coast for anything. They said I need a th350. Would I be better off with that?

thanks cool dudes
pphatbasstard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 01:13 AM   #2
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
well, the TH400 came factory behind the 283, 327, and the sixes...i heard it takes somewhere around 40 hp to spin the tranny alone, but its the strongest light duty auto out there. i guess its up to you...
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 01:16 AM   #3
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
One of my friends had a TH400 behind a stock '87 up 4bbl 305. The truck ran suprsingly well for a 305, and with the TH400 it would shift HARD into second gear. Leave it in 1st and floor it and that truck would lay down a 4' long strip of rubber when it hit 2nd gear.
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 01:24 AM   #4
pphatbasstard
Registered User
 
pphatbasstard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 166
Sooo I guess I was missinformed?
pphatbasstard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 01:35 AM   #5
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
Well they do take more power to run, but they are just about indestructable. If you are going to swap trannies you would be better off swapping to an OD tranny like a 700R4 or 200R4 so you can have that nice 4th gear for crusing down the highway.
IMO, swapping a TH400 to a TH350 wouldn't be too productive since you would only be picking up a few poinies (not sure on the exact number, from what i've heard maybe 15 would be freed up), and the TH350 is a weaker tranny, although plenty strong for a stock/mild small block.
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 01:37 AM   #6
too much stuff
Roadtrip!
 
too much stuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Grand Rapids MN
Posts: 13,768
I have an 87 305 fuel injected 2wd 1/2 ton with a turbo 400 factory. not good mpg and has the power of a 305...no problems though.
__________________
67 gmc custom lwb dakota truck. Sold...And bought back
69 swb 4x4 project (in progress)
70 c-10 lwb texas truck
70 4x4/BB/bkts/posi/tach(retired)
70 swb (wifes)
70 jimmy camper
71 K-5 factory 2wd
71 cheyenne 4x4/tach/posi/ plow rig
71 Cheyenne20 BB, buckets, tach, tilt, 4 speed
72 jimmy CST wyoming rig
72 jimmy Colorado rig
72 lifted texas 4x4 3/4 ton burb
65 fury conv. 383/auto
65 chrysler 300 "L" 413 auto
too much stuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 12:53 PM   #7
72C203503ONTHETREE
Registered User
 
72C203503ONTHETREE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grant, Alabama
Posts: 504
The biggest drawback to a 400 is the weight, they are HEAVY. A turbo 350 is an excellent trans also, many people use them in race cars and have little trouble. They are popular due to less weight and less parasitic loss. Thats the biggest reason the powerglides are even more popular for racing. For all out strength for everyday driving or abuse, a well built 400 will last almost forever. If your truck slows down that much, your torque convertor may have a way low stall speed or be defective. Any automatic should coast pretty good once you get off the gas, unless you are in too low a gear. If you get a 700R4, make sure you get a mid 80's and up Corvette or Z28 trans, they are the strongest. The 200R4 is ok but unless its built it will die sooner than any of the other trans. They arent as strong as the 350 or 400 and even worse than the 700. The 700 is a long tranny to, you will need to fabricate a trans mount and sgorten the driveshaft. The 350 is slightly shorter so you may need to find another driveshaft or have yours lengthened. The 200R4 and 700 will also need a way to engage the torque convertor clutch unless you get an aftermarket convertor that gets rid of that. B&M and TCI make a wiring kit that will allow you to use the convertor clutch which will give you better mileage. Do not use the convertor clutch without the wiring kit, it will burn your trans up without it working.
__________________
72 Chevy C20, SOLD (Dang it.)

09 Challanger RT six speed in all black.

74 Datsun 710 wagon, all 1.8 liters of screaming Datsun power.

73 C10 long bed, 350/350 combo, nice shape.
72C203503ONTHETREE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 01:03 PM   #8
Yellow Cheyenne
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eastern Kansas
Posts: 488
You don't say what speed you are coasting down from and also no mention of rear end ratio. If you have a a ratio in the 4's and are slowing or "coasting" down from 70 MPH, it doesn't matter which tranny you have, it will try to slow you down when you let off the gas pedal.

Randy
__________________
'72 Cheyenne. AC, PS, PB, Rear slider window, tilt. Light yellow (grapefruit yellow according to new sales literature from '72)
'56 Chevy short step V-8 (My dad bought it new!!)
'70 Olds 442 convertible
'70 Olds Rallye 350
Yellow Cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 01:56 PM   #9
SWEET7T
Try spinnin 4 rear tars
 
SWEET7T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 757
Just for comparison...

I have a 327/th350/3.08 rearend. When I'm doing ~75 down the road turning nearly 3000rpm, and I let off the gas, I slow down pretty quick too. My rpm drops about 300 when I do this, but remember that the torque convertor isn't just going to 'let go' and coast like you pushed in a clutch. When I am going slower like 45 or so, I don't slow down nearly as fast. If it is shifting fine, and your happy with it so far, don't worry about it.

The 400 is an excellent tranny. If I had one, I would keep it in there just because it isn't worth it to swap in a th350. The only swap I would do is a 700R4, and only for the overdrive.
__________________
SWEET7T
1970 C10, 2wd, LB, 307/TH350/3.08. PS, PB
SWEET7T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 02:35 PM   #10
junkyardjohn
Registered User
 
junkyardjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SOMERSET KY.
Posts: 6,427


THE T-400 IS PROBABLY THE STRONGEST AUTOMATIC TRANS. IN EXHISTANSE IN STOCK FORM. I DID GO WITH A T-350 IN PREFERANCE ONCE THOUGH, WHEN I WAS BUILDING A 67 CAMARO RACE CAR WITH A 400 SBC ON NITROUS, & THE EXTRA 70 LBS MATTERED QUITE A BIT TO ME. WHOEVER TOLD YOU THAT A T-400 WAS TOO MUCH TRANS. FOR SMALL BLOCK WAS MISTAKEN. JOHN
__________________
junkyardjohn
69 1 TON TOW TRUCK //
84 4WD CUCV BLAZER// 85 1 TON 4WD STAKE TRUCK// 86 M1031 5/4 TON 4WD CUCV// ALOT OF OLD TRUCKS FOR ONE OLD MAN TO DRIVE. THERES ROOM FOR ALL OF GODS CREATURES RIGHT NEXT TO MY MASHED POTATOES//
LIFE MEMBER OF P.E.T.A (PEOPLE EATING TASTY ANIMALS)

DON'T RENT U-HAUL

ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH
IT WILL AMAZE PART OF THE PEOPLE & ASTONISH THE REST
junkyardjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 08:09 PM   #11
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
I would keep the 400 T, as aready said, it does take about 15-20 more ponies to run, & is heavy......but its 1 damn tough pc!
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 08:25 PM   #12
rage'nrat638
Account Suspended
 
rage'nrat638's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ** THE FALL GUY **CHICAGO IL
Posts: 5,883
here's my coan converter.......TOAST......

TH400 STILL TICKING.....850 H.P.
rage'nrat638 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 08:35 PM   #13
inline6Bill
A classic GM kinda guy
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 296
My shop truck, a '69 CST 20, had a 307 and TH 400. The only thing wrong with the TH 400 is that it is heavy. I have had my TH 400 rebuilt twice in 300,000 miles; at 125,000 and new seals at 250,000, but I worked the tranny hard, pulling an 8000# travel trailer up and down hills in the Cascades of Oregon when the tranny started to give up !!!

The TH 400 is one tough tranny to beat, in fact, I NEVER will change to any other in my shop truck, only added a Gear Vendors overdrive when I had the trans rebuilt last time; best thing I ever did.

Whoever gave you that info about TH 400s is wrong.
__________________
Old school rap music: a dual exhausted GM 6 with no mufflers.

"If you can find a better vehicle, buy it" Lee Iacocca, Chrysler commercials of the '80s.
"I did. They are called Classic GM pickups !!!"
inline6Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 08:54 PM   #14
72gord
Never enough time!!
 
72gord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: sw Wisconsin
Posts: 602
I had a TH400 behind a 350 in a 72 Chevelle...did the leave it in low, floor it, and let it shift into 2nd....motor and trans were fine but my driveshaft twisted off and became a 2 piece unit
72gord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 11:47 PM   #15
67cst
i love summertime
 
67cst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kelowna BC
Posts: 4,303
ive got a 327 with a th400 behind it, we got it off a friend who pulled it out of a donor car, i think it was a late 60s impala..not too sure though, the motor is a low miler, has never been rebuilt and the tranny shifts great! i cant wait to get it on the road and smoke the tires
__________________
1967 shortbox stepside Chevy, 365 hp 327, th400.

GLOVE BOX LIGHTS FORSALE, click link for info

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=273724
67cst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 12:31 AM   #16
RON WOODGEARD
Resident Young Old Dude !
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,948
No doubts, The 400 is stronger, but everyone has failed to state that the 350 has a lower first gear. IE: better acceleration. Maybe that'
s what the guy was refering to????

I have a 350 in mine, It's been there for about 12 years,Behind a mellow built 350 HP ( approx.) 350. Some heavy duty off roading. It has a shift kit and an RV/Off road torque converter.
RON WOODGEARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 12:34 AM   #17
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
Quote:
Originally posted by RON WOODGEARD
No doubts, The 400 is stronger, but everyone has failed to state that the 350 has a lower first gear. IE: better acceleration. Maybe that'
s what the guy was refering to????
There's not much of a difference, 2.52 for the TH350 and 2.48 for the TH400......
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 01:20 AM   #18
RON WOODGEARD
Resident Young Old Dude !
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally posted by yellow72custom


There's not much of a difference, 2.52 for the TH350 and 2.48 for the TH400......
OK, Now take that and the lighter internal turning weight....
RON WOODGEARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 06:37 AM   #19
trukman1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beavercreek, Ohio 45431
Posts: 737
Thought this was about "slowing too fast" when letting off the gas! If it slows too much, the first gear ratio isn't enough to 'cause it and the weight shouldn't slow the truck enough to notice. If your power band is so low that the extra few ponies the TH400 takes is a problem then I'd be checking that. As is, I'd make sure you don't have a converter problem or brake/e-brake problems first. Normal operating tranny won't cause you to slow down that fast. Good luck. Bye!
__________________
1967 K30 461/TH400/Np205/D60/14FF/BDS
MTZ 375/75/16 on 16x10 Pro Comps
trukman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com