The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2004, 12:57 AM   #1
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
what tire size?

i wanna get some nitto 555's for tires...

but would a 255/45/17(fronts) and 275/40/17(back) look to small on only a 4/6 drop?

i wanna drop it down and make it a 5/7 drop later on(this year maybe?)

i only have 2 tires for my 17's right now, and they are 275/50/17's.
i would use those for a while till i could afford matching rear tires.

or i could get the nitto 450's in the following sizes:

255/50/17
275/50/17
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 01:21 AM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Eric, your not gonna' like this but IMHO the 275/40/17 is just too short for a full size truck.

If you want, in the morning I can get some pics of some take-off 275/40's up against my beaters 255/70/15's & my 74's 295/40/20's so you can see just how much shorter they are. That size is fine on my GF's T/A, but not on a truck.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 01:48 AM   #3
low 84
Registered User
 
low 84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,144
when i had my 17's i had 275/40 on front and 285/40 on rear, i agree with scoti, they were a little too short in my opinion. they still looked pretty good with a 5/7 but with an inch more of gap like you will have i think they would look wrong. if i was getting another set of 17's i'd go with something around 27-28 inches tall, not 25-26

__________________
'51 F100, backhalf with a narrowed 9 and coil overs, 18.5" mickeys, monte front clip, +400" sbc in the works

'05 1500 Crew Cab

RIP
'84 swb 5/7 drop, solid cammed 408 w/ fully ported dart heads, th350 w/ 10 inch hughes, 12 bolt w/ 3.73 richmonds and a locker
'80 swb 4x4 in progress: 7" lift, 350 th350/np205, d44 and 1.5" ORD tie rod, 14BFF w/discs , armored diff covers, 40" MTR's
low 84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 05:54 AM   #4
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by low 84
if i was getting another set of 17's i'd go with something around 27-28 inches tall, not 25-26
IIRC Eric, you're going to put the TTII on your truck, right? If so, why don't you do like Mike, and get 255/50 17's (27" tall) should look just perfect
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 12:08 PM   #5
odie82
Registered User
 
odie82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 349
275/40r17 are not to short, my are just fine, they sit at about 26'' tall
Attached Images
 
__________________
1982 chevy C-10, blue 2wd shortbox
17x9 cragar ss rims, 350V8-th400

2003 suzuki gsxr 1000-hit 175mph!!!
yeah it's fast-no you can't ride it
odie82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 01:08 PM   #6
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
no, they dont look bad, but they do have more wheel gap than what i would like.

how low is your truck odie?
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 02:12 PM   #7
hotrodhomi
Registered User
 
hotrodhomi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,737
Does anyone know of a site that you could type in a tire size and it will tell you the overall height?
hotrodhomi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 02:40 PM   #8
swervin ervin
You get what you pay for
 
swervin ervin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 4,798
Here's one.

http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

Here's another page of useful info. It will let you use a calculator to figure out a lot of stuff, including tire diameter.

http://www.73-87.com/convers_calcus/equation1.htm
__________________
Mike

1985 Chevy C-10
swervin ervin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 05:09 PM   #9
Grande Rojo
paper or plastic?
 
Grande Rojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 671
I've got 275/60/17 on the rear of my truck with a flip kit. They are about 30" tall. I think they look better with a little meat (sidewall) on them .
Attached Images
 
Grande Rojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 06:59 PM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
GrandeRojo.... that looks sweet.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 07:42 PM   #11
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
man, if i get those nitto 450's in the 255/50/17's, thats ONE MORE thing that i'm coping off of mike.

well, i had the flip kit first mike!!!

only reason i was asking about the lo-pro tire size was because i was wanting to run some nice drag radials(nitto 555r's) and they dont come in anything bigger.
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 09:34 PM   #12
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Why drag radials? These trucks have enough room to run meat.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2004, 11:30 PM   #13
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocbaud
only reason i was asking about the lo-pro tire size was because i was wanting to run some nice drag radials(nitto 555r's) and they dont come in anything bigger.
BFG's hook harder, period. Trust me, I'll be running a 325/50 15" BFG Drag Radial on the back of my truck, on a 15"x10" rim with 5½" BS. Trust me Eric, either run 255/55 17's all around, or 255/50 up front with 255/55 out back.
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com