The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-24-2005, 11:22 AM   #1
iluvmy72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
Is a Carter 600 enough for a 455?

I am wondering if my Carter 600 is enough for the big block 455. It was fine on my 350 but the 455....I don't know.
iluvmy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 11:27 AM   #2
JayDubBlazer
go cyclones
 
JayDubBlazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 1,883
I don't think it would be, I sure somebody will chime in with some more solid advice.
__________________
Wes



PROJECT OLE GREEN

1972 Blazer 4X4 350/700R4
2017 Silverado LT
JayDubBlazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 11:33 AM   #3
dtlilly
Account Suspended
 
dtlilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Shadow of Lambeau Field
Posts: 5,597
I wouldn't think so either, even if you jet the 600 up.
dtlilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 11:43 AM   #4
67chevemall
Registered User
 
67chevemall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NB
Posts: 3,367
you need AIR on a big block!
Theres a 800 on ebay that is sweet! It is on another post here.
__________________
1968 Chevy C10 307 3ott fleetside
1967 Chevy C/10 V8, 3spd, fleetside lwb.Sold
1967 Chev C/10 step, 383, M21. SOLD
67chevemall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 12:55 PM   #5
screamin_c102
Account Suspended
 
screamin_c102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Yoncalla Oregon
Posts: 775
NO, the CFM rating is the amount of air the carb can flow. The larger the engine displacement the more air needed to maintain a proper air/fuel ratio. Just jetting it up will increase the amount of fuel introduced into the engine, which will actually throw off the air/fuel ratio even worse.

Use a 750 CFM at least, or some of the older big block Quadrabogs were actually flowing 795 CFM.

The nice part about the Edelbrock/Carter carbs is that due to their variable venturi you can put a huge carb CFM wise on a smaller (or less needy) motor and jet it to run fine. As you change cam profiles and or CR you only need to adjust jetting.

Just my $.02
screamin_c102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 05:57 PM   #6
72BLAZERDUDE
Registered User
 
72BLAZERDUDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WATAUGA,TX
Posts: 675
You need at least a 750 CFM on that big block. I have a Edelbrock 1406 on my 307 and that is a 600 CFM carb.
__________________
72 2wd 307/AT/AC/TILT WHEEL
78 JIMMY HIGH SIERRA
72BLAZERDUDE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 06:02 PM   #7
GMC AMI
Registered User
 
GMC AMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Other Maine!
Posts: 2,236
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by iluvmy72
I am wondering if my Carter 600 is enough for the big block 455. It was fine on my 350 but the 455....I don't know.
NO
__________________
1968 Chevy 4x4 307 4 speed

Last edited by GMC AMI; 05-24-2005 at 06:04 PM.
GMC AMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2005, 06:19 PM   #8
flip66
Registered User
 
flip66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Garland TX Dallas area
Posts: 658
I was told by Edelbrock tech that a 600cfm is almost too small for a 396 so I would think that 600 would way to small for 455
__________________
1998 Pontiac Grad Prix GTP
1969 C10 396 TH400 3.08 posi
flip66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 07:43 AM   #9
Bowtie67
Registered User
 
Bowtie67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,266
Interesting!! Nascar engines putting out considerably more HP & RPM and have restricted their cfm's to I believe under 500CFMs. I have a friend who has a built 383 with a tunnel ram running 1 Holley 390CFM 4 barrel and claims he can smoke the tires up while cruising and gets some pretty good gas milage in his 38 sedan. Although you wont reach any peak HP numbers with the 455 and this carb but if it is just a cruiser it may work fine, I would just bring it to someone who can make sure the air fuel ratio is proper.
__________________
1967 C10 - SWBSS Pro Street 427sbc, 700R4 & 4.10 Gears
1948 Chevy FleetMaster Coupe, LS1, (almost done)
1950 Chevy StyleLine Coupe 250/6 3x2 Dueces
2009 Toyota Tundra
1996 Harley RoadKing

"I maybe getting old, but I can still burn rubber with the best of them"
Bowtie67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 10:47 AM   #10
GMC AMI
Registered User
 
GMC AMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Other Maine!
Posts: 2,236
Wink

[QUOTE=Bowtie67]Interesting!! Nascar engines putting out considerably more HP & RPM and have restricted their cfm's to I believe under 500CFMs.

That would be to Level the playing field! If you put a 455 in a truck who in their right mind would restrict the BB like that! Sure it will run OK and so will a 283 CI. IMO go for at least a 750 double pumper min., 455 is no wimpy motor so FEED THE NEED!
__________________
1968 Chevy 4x4 307 4 speed
GMC AMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 10:57 AM   #11
flip66
Registered User
 
flip66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Garland TX Dallas area
Posts: 658
True NASCAR does run on restrictor plates but the motors are built just for those races to do that they do not use the same thing on all tracks. I could be wrong but in the plate races they do not need much torque you need more CFM and fuel to get torque.
__________________
1998 Pontiac Grad Prix GTP
1969 C10 396 TH400 3.08 posi
flip66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 01:05 PM   #12
68Stepbed
Registered User
 
68Stepbed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
It depends on how your 455 is built. Is it stock or modified? On a stock 455 it should be fine. If it is modified the 600 may not flow enough air and may starve the engine. It's not how big the carb is as much as how the A/F mixture is according to the amount of air going through the carb. I have an article that a guy states that he took the 390 Holley off of his 302 and put it on his 460 and the jetting was perfect. I have a friend that drag races a 66 Fairlane with a 390 and he uses a 600 Edelbrock. When he switched to a 750, it ran worse. The extra cfm's are only useful in high rpm applications. Carbs don't usually flow full cfm ratings at cruise speeds.

I would try the 600 and if your not satisfied then try something bigger. I would try a 750 vaccum secondary Holley or a 650 mechanical secondary.

Just my 2 cents. Let us know what happens.
__________________
Matt

68 C10 stepside, LS1/700R4, TCI Engineering suspension system
68Stepbed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 03:34 PM   #13
Hoods69BadBowTie
Chevys Kick A$$
 
Hoods69BadBowTie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Zootown, MT
Posts: 12,699
Yeah, it really depends on how much you beef up your 455 or keep it stock. I think if its mainly stock a 650 would work good or even if its beefed up try running I think 670 but I can"t remember who makes one of the top of my head.
Later
__________________
*HOODS is what I answer too*
-'79, '77, '88 Pickup Sold, '85 Camaro, '83 T/A, '81,'83,'90 K5 Blazer All Sold
-'79 3/4 ton "Big Yellow Bananna" Lifted 4spd. 39.5 TSL Swampers, The money Pit
-'86 K5 Blazer Silverado 6.2 4" lift 35"s
-'95 Ext. Cab Shorty 4" Tuff Country rolling 35" M/T's
-'83 Monte Carlo T-Tops. 126,500 Original Miles
-LATER
I would rather push a Chevy then drive a ford!!
Hoods69BadBowTie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 05:14 PM   #14
Tom
driving is in my blood
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,751
NASCAR's get away with it because they make up for the power in other area's, namely heads and cam. Also don't forget they tune the intake for a supercharging effect, that helps up the flow of that little 500cfm carb a bit.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle.
-98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes.
-02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front
-CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis
DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me.
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2005, 09:13 PM   #15
ed455
Captain Ed
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Port Charlotte, FL
Posts: 1,241
Some of the old Mopar 383's and 440's in the big Newporst and New Yorkers had Holley 600 carbs on them. Small carbs make for good low end power which is what those big barges needed.
ed455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2005, 12:54 AM   #16
krue
Designated A-hole!
 
krue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Mississippi
Posts: 36,448
If you have the carb already, throw it on there. If it don't work you're not out anything.
If it does then you haven't bought a carb you don't need.
__________________
"If it ain't broke, fix it 'til it is!"
Being stupid ain't illegal.

We're Still Debt Free Except for the House!!!
www.daveramsey.com

70 GMC SWB Stepside project "Green Booger" soon to be 6.0l/4l80e
93 S-10 "Poppaw's Truck"
krue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2005, 06:41 AM   #17
GMC AMI
Registered User
 
GMC AMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Other Maine!
Posts: 2,236
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by krue
If you have the carb already, throw it on there. If it don't work you're not out anything.
If it does then you haven't bought a carb you don't need.
krue has told you the most practical solution here! Even a 500 two barrel will run ho-hum OK. It's all in how you wish to use the truck and how much power
you wish to unleash. Myself, I would like to be able to surprise the little v-8 Stangs at the traffic lights!
__________________
1968 Chevy 4x4 307 4 speed
GMC AMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2005, 03:29 PM   #18
Fred T
Cantankerous Geezer
 
Fred T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bel Aire, KS
Posts: 6,264
For a stock engine, yes. Figures out to 631 CFM.
http://musclecarsusa.com/prods/carburetion/info.html
__________________
Fred

There is no such thing as too much cam...just not enough engine.
Fred T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2005, 06:22 AM   #19
'68OrangeSunshine
Senior Member
 
'68OrangeSunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,539
I used to have a 454 in a '67 K/10 Suburban. The PO put it in. Nothing fancy, just a junkyard transplant, so very likely stock. PO also had a Carter AFB 9635. It ran good so I didn't change it. The truck would cruise the freeway at 80 like a walk in the park. I always thought it was a 750 CFM carb, but it turned out to be a 625 CFM. The Edelbrock match is an EDL 1400.
__________________


Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not.
'68OrangeSunshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 01:59 AM   #20
Ogier
Chopper/Painter
 
Ogier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Medford, Or.
Posts: 284
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by iluvmy72
I am wondering if my Carter 600 is enough for the big block 455. It was fine on my 350 but the 455....I don't know.

Yes. This will work just fine on your 455.

I just love it when the "bigger is better" crowd comes out to play. Carberation is a science not a guessing game.

What will happen if you go much bigger than a 650 is the bottom end will get soggy and the midrange will seem to go away.

My personal favorite carb for the street is the good old Holley model 1650 600cfm universal carberator. They are extremely tune-able and contrary to popular belief, can and do get great milage when set up for the vehicle.

Incidently, I used to run this same carb on my Stage II 455 Buick and could smoke the tires till they blew without brakes... :hit2:

just my .02$
__________________
With regards,
Ogier

1969 Chevrolet C20 - Resto-Custom started!!!
Ogier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 05:41 AM   #21
GMC AMI
Registered User
 
GMC AMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Other Maine!
Posts: 2,236
Sure the motor would run with a 500 two bbl as well but who would want that? With a 455 you do not need to worry about bottom end with all that torque. If you think a Buick stage 1 or 2 came with a 600 from the factory you are sadly mistaken, they can easily handle a 750 double pumper. I ran a 455 Buick in a 80 vette body at the drags
and I never saw any soggy botom end or any lacking mid-range. The Vette ran 7.2 at 92 mph in the 1/8 th mile with stock 308 gears right off the street. Even Caddy BB's came with a much bigger carb than a 600. Now why would GM do that?
__________________
1968 Chevy 4x4 307 4 speed
GMC AMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 06:47 AM   #22
Ogier
Chopper/Painter
 
Ogier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Medford, Or.
Posts: 284
Exclamation

True, the carbs that came out of the factory were _rated_ at higher CFMs, however, they were almost always Rochesters which are a pseudo-variable venturi carburetor and shares much more in design with the Predetors than with Edelbrocks, Carters, or Holleys.

The Rochester does _Not_ open up completely when you stab the throttle. It will only open as much as the engine can handle based on the amount of vacuum present in the manifold dictated by the RPM of the engine.

Thus, comparing the CFM rating of a Rochester and that of a Holley is rather like apples and oranges.

If you use a 750cfm Holley, Carter, or Edelbrock on a street driven vehicle you will likely have a soggy bottom end, crappy gas mileage and whitewashed cylinder walls.

Of course, I may just be blowing smoke out of my ass but having built in excess of 250,000 total horsepower in my life in engines ranging from lawnmower engines to 1200hp blown drag motors, I rather think that I am likely not.

I have said it before and I will again, Carburetion is a science. Bigger is usually not better.

Again, just my .02$
__________________
With regards,
Ogier

1969 Chevrolet C20 - Resto-Custom started!!!
Ogier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 07:10 AM   #23
GMC AMI
Registered User
 
GMC AMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Other Maine!
Posts: 2,236
Wink

The Rochester does _Not_ open up completely when you stab the throttle. It will only open as much as the engine can handle based on the amount of vacuum present in the manifold dictated by the RPM of the engine.

True on vac. secondary models, not mechanical secondarys which will open when you stab the throttle. I was using a 750 Holley double pumper on the 455 in the Vette.
It would truley pin you back in the seat from the so called soggy bottom end, maybe in your application, just was not true in mine.
__________________
1968 Chevy 4x4 307 4 speed
GMC AMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 07:33 AM   #24
70c10
67-72 Addict!
 
70c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The TAX State!
Posts: 7,856
I would personally run a 750. I have been in a few cars with stock 455 motors that had 750 carbs that would burn the tires off the car. I have a buddy with a 455 in his GTO and he runs a Dominator but that's another story
__________________
Jim

1970 C/10 Fleetside w/Ghost Flames
Lowered 4.5" front and 4" rear (Raked)
355/350 Turbo w/shift kit
10" Redneck Performance Verter w/2500 stall
Hooker Super Comps part#2808-1
Performer RPM Air-Gap
12 Bolt w/3:73 gears- Eaton Posi
Comp Cams XE262 with 1.6 Crane Energizers, Road Demon 625 and Brodix IK 180 heads
70c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 02:24 PM   #25
crm318
Alright Alright Alright
 
crm318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midland, Texas
Posts: 1,672
i think a good running qjet will suffice
__________________
1972 Cheyenne
Chevrolet red and white
357ci, Vortec heads,
GM Performance high rise intake,
Comp 268H .454/.454 218/218 110 LSA
Quadrajet carb, Flowtech headers, 2.25 40 series
HEI, Curve kit, TH 350, 3.07 gears
275/60/15s on 15x8 rallies
crm318 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com