|
|
|
10-22-2005, 03:49 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ramarama NZ
Posts: 5
|
Repro Fenders
Hi all, just curious to know if anyone has had a go at fitting a set of the repro fenders for a 55-57. My project has stalled (until they turn up shortly) and should be back underway soon.
David Last edited by aventino; 10-22-2005 at 03:50 AM. |
|
|
|
10-22-2005, 05:57 AM
|
#2 |
|
"Treasure the Ride"
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mid Michigan, Harrison Michigan, USA
Posts: 682
|
Re: Repro Fenders
PM'd ya.
__________________
If you think you can you're right. If you think you can't you're still right. Trucks: '56 SWB; '57 SWB; '63 C-10 Current projects: 1963 Long Fleetside for the wife! '56 for the daughter. Visit us at: www.ricos-rods-and-relics.com |
|
|
|
|
10-26-2005, 03:14 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Catchy title goes here..
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 39,767
|
Re: Repro Fenders
Quote:
Are you looking for the fenders themselves? Or tips on fitment from those who have done this? |
|
|
|
|
|
10-27-2005, 07:00 PM
|
#4 |
|
Led Sled! Discs R 4 ME!
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toms River, NJ, USA (Transplanted Hoosier)
Posts: 7,327
|
Re: Repro Fenders
aventino,
Check some of our board vendors.. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a....php?f=10&a=10 Its likely one may have what you need. |
|
|
|
|
11-07-2005, 04:16 PM
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Whitehorse YK Canada
Posts: 2,651
|
Re: Repro Fenders
My 59 GMC has a set of the steel reproduction front fenders on it and the quality was excellent. They fit well, and look great.
My truck is a GMC and the fenders have the emblem holes for a Chev so the holes had to be welded shut and GMC holes drilled. They also came with a factory antenae hole. If you are paying a bodyman it is cheaper to buy these reproduction ones than fix up an old rusyt set.
__________________
Blaine 59 GMC 9314 a.k.a. Whoopee 68 C20 50th Anniversary a.k.a. The Rat http://www.flickr.com/photos/northerngmc/ http://www.members.tripod.com/P-wee/index_032.htm 1.61803 is one H of a lot better than 3.14159, no really it is! |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
