The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-27-2005, 05:16 PM   #1
Purs
Got Big Block?
 
Purs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: West Texas
Posts: 1,510
Lower in the back

I need to get the arse end of my '68 coil spring C10 down about 1.5-2" blocks seem to be the most economical. Can I get the parts at a local store or am I going to have to order them? What else is needed other than longer U bolts and the blocks themselves? thanks.
__________________
"Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted."
Purs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 05:21 PM   #2
wessscott
Registered User
 
wessscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 41
Re: Lower in the back

That is all you need.
__________________
70 step with 68 clip, still in the body shop. GMPP 385 fast burn crate motor, 4:11 eaton. 5 lug 4/6" drop
wessscott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 05:22 PM   #3
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,271
Re: Lower in the back

Quote:
Originally Posted by Purs
I need to get the arse end of my '68 coil spring C10 down about 1.5-2" blocks seem to be the most economical. Can I get the parts at a local store or am I going to have to order them? What else is needed other than longer U bolts and the blocks themselves? thanks.

I am not sure if blocks will work. The U-bolts on these things are different than the two U-bolt set up on 73 and ups. Unless LMC or one of the other suppliers on the board carry them, they do not exist. The best way is a set of lowered springs.
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 06:21 PM   #4
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: Lower in the back

I've posted this pic before a lot of times.


This is a set I built for a 72. The blocks are simply scrap 2x3 thick wall tubing that I boxed the ends of and drilled holes through for the u-bolts to pass through.

The u-bolts came from my local spring shop. They make them while you wait for under 30 bucks per pair.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 06:18 PM   #5
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: Lower in the back

Yes, blocks will work. I've lowered em plenty o times that way. Have a local spring shop make your ubolts just like stock only longer. Take one of your stockers to show them.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 06:24 PM   #6
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,271
Re: Lower in the back

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tx Firefighter
Yes, blocks will work. I've lowered em plenty o times that way. Have a local spring shop make your ubolts just like stock only longer. Take one of your stockers to show them.

The one time I tried blocks the holes did not line up. The U-bolts from our trucks are wider and will not fit in the holes on the blocks. Just my one experience, maybe you found a different block with a wider mounting surface?
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 06:32 PM   #7
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,271
Re: Lower in the back

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70rs/ss
The one time I tried blocks the holes did not line up. The U-bolts from our trucks are wider and will not fit in the holes on the blocks. Just my one experience, maybe you found a different block with a wider mounting surface?

Sorry I was typing my response to your post above and then your homebuilt pict came up, so I missed it. If you home build em then the holes are where you put em. I bought a set of lowering blocks and they did not work, that was my point.
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 06:34 PM   #8
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: Lower in the back

completely understandable on the missed post there ghost rider.

The story is, I was working for the Postal Service as a mechanic at the time and we had no work to do, so I made the blocks as a "Gub ment project" in my spare time.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 06:25 PM   #9
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: Lower in the back

Read my post above, I MADE the blocks out of steel and drilled my own holes.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin

Last edited by Tx Firefighter; 10-27-2005 at 06:29 PM.
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 09:14 PM   #10
raggedjim
Senior Member
 
raggedjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Posts: 3,589
Re: Lower in the back

Classic Performance Products sells blocks specifically for coil sprung trucks, as well as ECE. I have blocks from CPP and they work great.
http://www.classicperform.com/goingdown6772.htm
The cheapo blocks from Azone or other auto parts stores won't work.

Good luck, Rg
__________________
Roger

'68 Short step - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=849675
'69 ('70?) 2wd Blazer
'70 GMC Jimmy 2wd
'73 Firebird - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=853203
raggedjim is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 09:21 PM   #11
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: Lower in the back

Damn, CPP gets 69 bucks a pair for those lowering block sets. I need to start making them as a sideline for extra cash.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 09:35 PM   #12
raggedjim
Senior Member
 
raggedjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Posts: 3,589
Re: Lower in the back

Tx, you got that right, they ain't cheap... I'll buy a set of 2" from you (ubolts included), how much do you want?

Rg
__________________
Roger

'68 Short step - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=849675
'69 ('70?) 2wd Blazer
'70 GMC Jimmy 2wd
'73 Firebird - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=853203

Last edited by raggedjim; 10-27-2005 at 09:37 PM.
raggedjim is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 09:52 PM   #13
67Fleet
Outlandish Trends - FL
 
67Fleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,396
Re: Lower in the back

I got mine from CPP also. They fit great. It was a total PITA to get the old u-bolt on the passenger side out. Ended up hitting it with the air hammer and it finally broke free. Here's a pic for ya:
__________________
-Bret
67 short-fleet sold!

Last edited by 67Fleet; 10-27-2005 at 09:54 PM.
67Fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 10:13 PM   #14
pebbleboy
Son Of Gravel Man
 
pebbleboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cleveland OH
Posts: 638
Re: Lower in the back

Would it be just as easy and about the same price to just put new springs in there?
pebbleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 10:29 PM   #15
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: Lower in the back

New springs go about 100-110 bucks, plus 10 bucks or more for shipping.

I built the lowering blocks because scrap rectangular tubing was like 2 or 3 bucks, and the u-bolts were just under 30. Total price under 35 bucks for me.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 10:34 PM   #16
67Fleet
Outlandish Trends - FL
 
67Fleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,396
Re: Lower in the back

Quote:
Originally Posted by pebbleboy
Would it be just as easy and about the same price to just put new springs in there?
Yes, to do it up front it would, but I had 4" drop springs in there already and it was also cheaper for me to go this route.
__________________
-Bret
67 short-fleet sold!
67Fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 11:00 PM   #17
raggedjim
Senior Member
 
raggedjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Posts: 3,589
Re: Lower in the back

That's where I'm at, 4" springs with 2" blocks for 6" drop, without having to worry about shock relocators...

Rg
__________________
Roger

'68 Short step - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=849675
'69 ('70?) 2wd Blazer
'70 GMC Jimmy 2wd
'73 Firebird - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=853203
raggedjim is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 11:31 PM   #18
67Fleet
Outlandish Trends - FL
 
67Fleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,396
Re: Lower in the back

Quote:
Originally Posted by raggedjim
That's where I'm at, 4" springs with 2" blocks for 6" drop, without having to worry about shock relocators...

Rg
you still need the relocators. Its not about the length, it's about the angle. I couldn't believe how much of a difference it made after I installed mine.
__________________
-Bret
67 short-fleet sold!
67Fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 11:42 PM   #19
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: Lower in the back

I think what's he's getting at is that his rear shocks are only "seeing" 4 inches of drop with that setup.

I personally have run all the way down to 6 inches of drop without shock relocators without too bad of a ride, and 4 inches without any real noticeable deteoriation in ride at all. That said, I run shock relocators on all my dropped stuff now. I used cut and weld panhard bars to change their length too.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 11:38 PM   #20
powell72
Senior Member
 
powell72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Loveland Co.
Posts: 3,098
Re: Lower in the back

I made my own blocks like Tx did and had to do some fabbing on the passenger side where the mount for the adjustable panhard interfered with the block. I had my block above the mount since my truck was bagged. Did you have an adjustable bar Tx? Was your block below the mount?
__________________
Chris
74 Custom Deluxe SWB 350/350/3.73’s
99 2wd Silverado RCSB 5.3/4L60/3.90’s

http://www.classictrucks.com/feature...short_bed.html
powell72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 11:43 PM   #21
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: Lower in the back

Powell, that truck has an ECE adjustable bar, not the super bar. It's mounted just like stock, on top of the differential.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 11:53 PM   #22
raggedjim
Senior Member
 
raggedjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Posts: 3,589
Re: Lower in the back

I'm with TX on this one, tons of people will claim you need a c-notch with a 6" drop, but it's not true...

I think the shock relocators are a good idea, as they do correct the shock angle, but is it a NEED, nope, 15,000 miles and I haven't needed it so far.

Course I haven't needed my fire extinguisher either... hmmm...

Good night, Rg
__________________
Roger

'68 Short step - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=849675
'69 ('70?) 2wd Blazer
'70 GMC Jimmy 2wd
'73 Firebird - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=853203
raggedjim is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 02:30 PM   #23
milehightoyz
AttentionDeficitDisorder
 
milehightoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 600
Re: Lower in the back

hey im thinking of making me some quick lowering blocks like the ones yuove made out of square tube. how imperative is it that you box the ends as you did? what wall thickness did you use both on the channel and on the boxing ends? thanks again
milehightoyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 03:49 PM   #24
67chevemall
Registered User
 
67chevemall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NB
Posts: 3,367
Re: Lower in the back

could always get two airbags with the lines and valves 4 now.
Compressor to go up and a finger nail to go down.
$0.02
__________________
1968 Chevy C10 307 3ott fleetside
1967 Chevy C/10 V8, 3spd, fleetside lwb.Sold
1967 Chev C/10 step, 383, M21. SOLD
67chevemall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2006, 07:10 AM   #25
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: Lower in the back

I used thick wall rectangular tubing. It was 1/8 or 1/4 inch thick, I don't remember now. I didn't see any need to box the ends, but I was doing it as a "governement project" back when I worked for the Post Office, so I had plenty of time to make them fancy.

I've seen lots of guys just use the tubing and leave them open front and rear.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com