|
|
|
12-29-2005, 11:23 AM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: tulsa OK
Posts: 3,070
|
stance help
i need help with the stance on my truck. witch one do you guys like? the wheels and tires im using are gonna be 20 in the rear and 18 or mabey 19 in front. the tires on there now in the pic are 28" tall.
pic #1  and pic #2 
|
|
|
|
12-29-2005, 11:43 AM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Williamsburg, Ohio
Posts: 1,798
|
Re: stance help
did you use blocks to lower the rear?
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2005, 12:16 PM
|
#3 |
|
Dork For Days
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 407
|
Re: stance help
I'd go with a more level look. Higher in the front never looks right to me.
I'm also tired of the old school "rake" look (jacked in the back). IMO! 
__________________
1972 C20, 402/700R4 - My first classic truck, bought in September 2005. 85% transformed from "Farm" to "Cool" status!  1970 Dodge Challenger 440, 4sp (my other toy) 12.67 @ 117 MPH, with a pathetic 2.022 60' 2007 Dodge Charger SRT-8 2008 Cadillac CTS All-American garage, baby! |
|
|
|
|
12-29-2005, 01:54 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: tulsa OK
Posts: 3,070
|
Re: stance help
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2005, 12:24 PM
|
#5 |
|
1968 C20 Vortec Beast
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: STILLWATER,OKLAHOMA
Posts: 483
|
Re: stance help
I still like the raked look if you are going low. Is it just me or is the front suspension sitting to far back?
__________________
Ugly or not it still kicks a**! |
|
|
|
|
12-29-2005, 01:33 PM
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wakaw, Sask, Canada
Posts: 3,180
|
Re: stance help
I also prefer a more level appearance with little, if any rake.
__________________
"You can take the man out of PA, but you can't take PA out of the man" |
|
|
|
|
12-29-2005, 01:58 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: tulsa OK
Posts: 3,070
|
Re: stance help
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
