|
08-11-2006, 02:31 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Just outside Durham, NC
Posts: 894
|
C vs. K designations
I was asked the other day why chevy/gmc designated their trucks as C10-30 and K10-30, I explained it was 1/2-1ton and 2wd vs. 4wd. They said, "well, the F in F150 probably stands for ferd, the D in D150 probably stands for Dodge, the C in C10 stands for Chevrolet, what does the K stand for?"
I didn't have an answer......anyone know the origin/meaning of these designations?
__________________
1969 SS 350 Camaro Sold 2008 1970 3/4T K20, stock height with 33's, 250 I6, 3 on the tree, and locked front and rear 4.10's 1980 Chevy Malibu 2 dr Sold 2007 1993 Olds. Cutlass Ciera Wagon Traded 2006 2003 Saturn L200 w/5pd. D/D My list spans 5 decades with One common thread.....GM! |
08-11-2006, 02:47 PM | #2 | |
Resident Curmudgeon
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NH
Posts: 6,664
|
Re: C vs. K designations
Quote:
__________________
Currently on or near the homestead: 67 Chevy SWB 2WD stepside 350/3 on tree (Pat's) 67 GMC SWB 2WD Fleet 402/auto (Brian's under construction) 67 Chevy 3/4 ton 2WD 402/auto (Business Hauler) 67 Chevy 1 ton dually 2WD 396/4 speed (Former business hauler, Needs TLC) 68 Chevy 1/2 ton Suburban 2WD 250 six/3 on tree (Brian's Needs TLC) 70 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD 350/4 speed (Pat's - Disguised as a 68 GMC) 71 Chevy SWB stepside (Crushed by tree - parts donor) 72 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD (Parts donor) 72 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD Suburban (Parts Donor) 72 GMC 3/4 ton 4WD 292 six/4 speed (Mine - Disguised as a 67 GMC) 81 GMC 4WD Dually Dump Body 350/4 speed (Business Hauler) 82 Camaro Z/28 355/Super T-10 (Pat's toy) 93 Caprice 9C1 (Brian's Cop Car) 02 Toyota Camry (Reliable but a souless steel and plastic hulk) 2011 2SS RS Camaro M6 Factory Hurst Shifter Maybe I need to sell some of this crap Yet another Bozo with a sawz-all |
|
08-12-2006, 07:46 AM | #3 | |
The LuvShack Garage
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maple Grove, TN (West Side)
Posts: 30,484
|
Re: C vs. K designations
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Op: "TN Classic Transport Carriers" The Toy: "Square Vette" 72 Hybrid Blazer Toy Barn: "LuvShack" 40 x 60 x 20 Shop Tow Piggy:"Maddy" 88 Silverado 3500 Hauler: "Feathers" 14 Aluma 8218T |
|
08-11-2006, 05:20 PM | #4 | |
Cantankerous Geezer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bel Aire, KS
Posts: 6,264
|
Re: C vs. K designations
From CPNE's link
Quote:
__________________
Fred There is no such thing as too much cam...just not enough engine. |
|
08-11-2006, 10:25 PM | #5 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: C vs. K designations
Yeah,cuz "G" stood for Van...Fords and Dodges are dumb.They don`t distinguish between 2wd and 4wd in the moderl designate.There`s only one best,and they left it to them.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
08-11-2006, 11:46 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portage, WI
Posts: 89
|
Re: C vs. K designations
Actually Dodge 1/2T 4x4 is designated W100 and so on. My dad retired from Chrysler a few years ago- I can get a really good deal on a new Dodge. I bought a new one once.....Thats why I'd drive an old beater Chevy before a new Dodge- they both can be a piece of $h!t but I don't feel as bad because atleast the Chevy has hope for it!
__________________
Scott 66 chevy short step 327 4speed 67 chevy Short Fleet tpi 350 700r4 72 chevy K10 swb 01 GMC Sierra 01 Pontiac Bonneville |
08-12-2006, 07:09 AM | #7 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: C vs. K designations
I should know that,I had a`69W200,Doah!!Parts were obsolete while Chevy/GMC parts were a walk-up item.Matter of fact,only Dodge had an actual name for theirs,"Power Wagon",until they turned gay and tossed their heritage and started naming them after a sheep.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ Last edited by special-K; 08-12-2006 at 07:09 AM. |
08-12-2006, 07:43 PM | #8 | |
God Bless Mr. T
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 348
|
Re: C vs. K designations
Quote:
I shouldn't laugh...I'm from Montana!
__________________
Like a midget at a urinal...sometimes you must stay on your toes. |
|
08-12-2006, 08:01 PM | #9 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: C vs. K designations
That link has some inacuracys on the longhorn.
|
08-16-2006, 05:01 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Posts: 3,583
|
Re: C vs. K designations
Don't forget the 2wd K-5 Blazers... That one breaks the rule
Breakin the rule... Breaking the rule! Rg
__________________
Roger '68 Short step - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=849675 '69 ('70?) 2wd Blazer '70 GMC Jimmy 2wd '73 Firebird - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=853203 |
08-16-2006, 09:11 PM | #11 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: C vs. K designations
nope, just the badging...which the trucks do too in the badging department.
ALL the trucks on these years were MARKED with a c on the fender... but a K in the VIN for the 4X4 ones. ALL the Blazers on these years were MARKED with a K on the fender... but a 2 wheel drive VIN had a C. |
08-17-2006, 10:49 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: LHC, AZ
Posts: 385
|
Re: C vs. K designations
Also 72 models had an additional letter at the beginning. I believe an extra C for Chev and T for GMC
__________________
70 Jimmy 4x4 71 GMC 2500 Too bad stupidity isn't painful |
08-18-2006, 07:35 AM | #13 | |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: C vs. K designations
Quote:
Blazers started off as 4wd,so they named it the K/5.Let`s get all nitpicky now...Why is it a "5"?Is it a 1/4ton???
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ Last edited by special-K; 08-18-2006 at 07:37 AM. |
|
08-20-2006, 05:09 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,440
|
Re: C vs. K designations
[QUOTE=special-K;
Blazers started off as 4wd,so they named it the K/5.Let`s get all nitpicky now...Why is it a "5"?Is it a 1/4ton???[/QUOTE] From what I've gathered on this site, GM originally was considering a real 1/4 ton truck. [Possibly angling for a Viet Nam era military contract?]-- Something about the size of the CJ jeep or the Harvester Scout I. The pictures of the project I saw were of one ugly truck. The project dragged -- missed it's '67 release and so it was decided to make a utility vehicle from a cut-down K/10 fleetside fullsize chassis. This one they got on line for the '69 model year debut. They kept the designation K/5. I'm glad GM went in the direction they did. No ugly trucks. OK. No ugly full-size trucks.[EDIT]
__________________
Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not. Last edited by '68OrangeSunshine; 08-21-2006 at 04:53 AM. |
08-20-2006, 11:53 AM | #15 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: C vs. K designations
|
08-21-2006, 04:56 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,440
|
Re: C vs. K designations
True, but they were actually imports.
__________________
Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not. |
08-21-2006, 06:08 AM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Methdependence, MO
Posts: 30
|
Re: C vs. K designations
In my world, that truck (whose name I shall not speak) never existed.
__________________
1972 Chevy SWB 4x4 |
08-18-2006, 06:49 PM | #18 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: C vs. K designations
good point... base model trucks
|
08-20-2006, 03:39 AM | #19 |
I survived Dead Man's Curve.
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Nine-Five-687
Posts: 389
|
Re: C vs. K designations
So, we got C10 C20 C30. Why do I see some sites with "C15" and C25"? Are they just dumb?
__________________
"The people should not be afraid of their government. The government should be afraid of it's people." "The Hurricane" 1967 Chevrolet C10 350 Eight Cylinder, 700R4 BowtieOverdrive Cherry Bomb... Disturbing the Peace Since 1968. |
08-20-2006, 04:12 AM | #20 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: C vs. K designations
in 67 - 72, GMC trucks were 1500,2500 and 3500. (canadian models had 910, 920, and 930 in 67) Sometime in the 73 - 87 run, chevy went to the same designation.
|
08-20-2006, 12:16 PM | #21 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: C vs. K designations
My dream is to build a Blazer down to the size of a Jeep,Scout,or 1st Bronco.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
08-21-2006, 05:33 AM | #22 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: C vs. K designations
very true, but that was the begining of the end... now the # 1 import, is also the US's #1 export, you have americans building foreighns, and domestics being imported....
|
08-21-2006, 03:29 PM | #23 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: C vs. K designations
LOL mike!!!
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|