The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2007, 08:17 PM   #1
bowtieboy93
Registered User
 
bowtieboy93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: (Cloverdale) Surrey BC Canada
Posts: 1,566
Rear Gear

I was wondering what axle gears would be ideal for my truck. I have a 350 With what will be around 300 - 350 HP with a TH350 tranny and I am getting a posi carrier from my dads friend. This will not be my daily driver but I hope to drive it alot and I was just wondering what will be the best for it.
__________________
Travis
travis_moffatt@hotmail.com
1969 Chevrolet C-10 LWB, 350c.i., TH350, In Pieces.
1991 GMC Sonoma, IROCS s10 grill
1963 Ford Galaxie 351/C4
bowtieboy93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 08:23 PM   #2
84_4x4
Registered User
 
84_4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Louisville Ky
Posts: 179
Re: Rear Gear

could always use 4.10 or 3.73 depending on how important gas mileage or takeoff power is to you
__________________
1971 c10 350ci long bed fleet side
84_4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 08:26 PM   #3
Jondotcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 11
Re: Rear Gear

If you do any freeway I wouldn't go any higher than 3:73... I'd actually say 3:54 or so it would be good for both quick spurts and freeway cruising.

I'm wondering what where the gear options originally?
Jondotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 08:39 PM   #4
bowtieboy93
Registered User
 
bowtieboy93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: (Cloverdale) Surrey BC Canada
Posts: 1,566
Re: Rear Gear

Gas milage doesnt really matter 2 me im gonna have 2 trucks by the time im done i just need to to pass stupid air care (thing we have up her if your vehicle gives off to much of a certain chemical in the exhaust u cant insure it until its fixed. but it looks like it will be done in 2 years cuz so many vehicles are "earth friendly") and freeway prob not to much a couple of times to work. And maybe to the hockey game but thats it.
__________________
Travis
travis_moffatt@hotmail.com
1969 Chevrolet C-10 LWB, 350c.i., TH350, In Pieces.
1991 GMC Sonoma, IROCS s10 grill
1963 Ford Galaxie 351/C4
bowtieboy93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 08:43 PM   #5
bowtieboy93
Registered User
 
bowtieboy93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: (Cloverdale) Surrey BC Canada
Posts: 1,566
Re: Rear Gear

The original gears are 3.07:1 which gotta go
__________________
Travis
travis_moffatt@hotmail.com
1969 Chevrolet C-10 LWB, 350c.i., TH350, In Pieces.
1991 GMC Sonoma, IROCS s10 grill
1963 Ford Galaxie 351/C4
bowtieboy93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 08:37 PM   #6
killer71
Registered User
 
killer71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: at work
Posts: 2,552
Re: Rear Gear

depends on what your using it for. If your gonna be on the free way and not pulling anything I would go with a 3.08 (just driving). If your gonna be pulling a load, racing, etc then go with a 4.10. I recently changed from a 3.73 to a 3.08 because I do free way, local driving. I don't pull anything and will never be a hotrodder. Just my .02
__________________
R.I.P.
Killer 71
10/26/07
killer71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 08:54 PM   #7
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Re: Rear Gear

I was gonna recomend a set of 3.07's. I had them in my old 1/2 ton and they were fine. It would launch like a raped ape, and cruise at a semi decently low RPM.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 09:03 PM   #8
killer71
Registered User
 
killer71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: at work
Posts: 2,552
Re: Rear Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn Man View Post
I was gonna recomend a set of 3.07's. I had them in my old 1/2 ton and they were fine. It would launch like a raped ape, and cruise at a semi decently low RPM.
I'm with Longhorn Man!
__________________
R.I.P.
Killer 71
10/26/07
killer71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 09:06 PM   #9
msgross
Registered User
 
msgross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central PA
Posts: 12,201
Re: Rear Gear

won't it matter what posi carrier he gets? That could limit you to 3.73 and up or lower than 3.73..
__________________
The Garage:
1968 K-10 SWB - "Project Money Pit"
1996 Z-71 - "huntin rig"
1969 C-10 LWB (SOLD) "Project flip that truck or else"
1993 Passport, F@rd 1-ton (SOLD)"Project Cousin Eddie"


My Garage Build "The 1,000 footer"
msgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 10:37 PM   #10
jay_shy
SWB 4X4 CLUB
 
jay_shy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 1,088
Re: Rear Gear

Summit racing sales a 3.73 gear set for series 3 and series 4 carriers. I think the 3.73 gear set for the series 3 carrier are thicker if I understand correctly. Has anyone tried the thicker gears, and how did it work out for you.

Jason
jay_shy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 06:36 AM   #11
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Re: Rear Gear

You fellows can have your 3.73's. I was cruising 80 on the freeway yesterday and enjoying the hell out of my 3.07 gears.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 06:48 PM   #12
mnunn454
Registered User
 
mnunn454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 602
Re: Rear Gear

I have 3.73's and in hindsight wish I had something [numerically] lower. this 10 MPG stuff ain't much fun.

3.07s with a stall converter in a 3 speed TH350 tranny would take off fine and still cruise reasonably.

If I get the opportunity to install a TH700 with the 30% overdrive, I'll have the best of both worlds, takeoff and cruise.
__________________
69 C-10 SWB Fleetside 454/TH400 (For Sale)
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/c...ct=1299&cat=12
70 El Camino 454 TH700
29 Model A 4-DR Sedan Deluxe
mnunn454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 07:49 PM   #13
1968SWBBigBlock
Active Member
 
1968SWBBigBlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,643
Re: Rear Gear

3500 RPM, with a 28" tall tire and a 1.00 gear ratio in the tranny would equal
Gear2.59 Speed112mph
Gear 2.73 Speed106mph
Gear 3.08 Speed 94mph
Gear 3.36 Speed 87 mph
Gear 3.55 Speed 82 mph
Gear 3.70 Speed 78 mph
Gear 4.11 Speed 70 mph
Gear 4.56 Speed 64 mph


I hope this helps, I like have a number of miles with big blocks and 3.73 rear ends with no compliants. That said we are almost done with 4.10 gears in the new rear end.
__________________
1968 SWB
454 + .040, 490HP x 540 FT pounds of Torque 10-1 Kb Forged pistons, recon rods w/ ARP wave loc bolts
781 heads Ported with 2.19/1.88 SSTvalves
Lunati 60204 cam, Micro Trol lifters,
Ported Edelbrock Performer Rpm manifold armor coated, Pertronix Triple Strike Ignition
Holley 770 Street Avenger carb,Headers armor coated
Built by Watson Ruppel Performance in Sarahsville Ohio.
Hardshift Tranny Built Turbo 350,TSI 10" 3000 stall
12 Bolt Eaton Posi 4.10 Richmond Gears moser axles
18.5" x 31" Hoosier Pro Street Radials
ET Classic 5 Wheels - polished
Power Steering, Power Brakes,Disc Brakes,Tach & Gauge Dash, Tilt,Factory Air (gone)
Custom Paint & Body Work

Special thanks to my wife, my son and my money tree
1968SWBBigBlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 08:05 PM   #14
pat
Senior Member
 
pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lindsay, TX
Posts: 1,245
Re: Rear Gear

I was worried about my 3.07 rear being a little to high, but you guys are making me feel better. Plus its a posi and Ive got a 2500 stall TCI tconverter.
__________________
68 Chevy 383/350 w/shift kit, 380hp/425ft-lbs, 4.5/5 drop, 17" TT2s
64 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 10:16 PM   #15
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Re: Rear Gear

that converter may end up burning up the tranny.
You'll be slipping on the converter untill you get to 65 MPH, which is at the stall of the converter.
So when ever you will be driving, if you are in 3rd gear and not doin 65, you'll be heating up thetranny REAL good.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 10:47 PM   #16
Kager67
what knocking sound?
 
Kager67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: good ol North Dakota
Posts: 148
Re: Rear Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn Man View Post
that converter may end up burning up the tranny.
You'll be slipping on the converter untill you get to 65 MPH, which is at the stall of the converter.
So when ever you will be driving, if you are in 3rd gear and not doin 65, you'll be heating up thetranny REAL good.
I agree. I run about 2700 at 65 and don't dare put more than a 2000 stall in mine. With the way my motor is built I should have at least a 3000 stall......oh well.

kage
__________________


1968 C-10

1953 belair two-door post

1955 chevy 3600 big window

1950 studebaker starlite coupe

1968 Impala SS
Kager67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 10:57 PM   #17
Kager67
what knocking sound?
 
Kager67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: good ol North Dakota
Posts: 148
Re: Rear Gear

As far as your original post, I would go with 3.73's. You say your not worried about mpg, and with not too much highway driving, they would work good. You will be turning a few more R's, but the extra snoot is worth it in my opinion. Another factor is the exhaust. If your running a loud exhaust, it will be just that much louder in the cab with the 3.73's. Just something to think about.

kage
__________________


1968 C-10

1953 belair two-door post

1955 chevy 3600 big window

1950 studebaker starlite coupe

1968 Impala SS
Kager67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 11:35 PM   #18
pat
Senior Member
 
pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lindsay, TX
Posts: 1,245
Re: Rear Gear

Son of a ......

Not trying to jack the thread, but should I get a new converter or new rear end gears, which I kind of wanted..?
__________________
68 Chevy 383/350 w/shift kit, 380hp/425ft-lbs, 4.5/5 drop, 17" TT2s
64 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
pat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 11:56 PM   #19
Kager67
what knocking sound?
 
Kager67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: good ol North Dakota
Posts: 148
Re: Rear Gear

It depends on what your going to use it for. If you have a 'built' motor that you want to do some racing with, its time for new gears. If you do mostly cruzin and have a pretty tame motor, its time for a different converter. The drag racing experts on here know alot more about this than I do, but with 3.07's I'm not sure you should use much more than the stock converter.

kage
__________________


1968 C-10

1953 belair two-door post

1955 chevy 3600 big window

1950 studebaker starlite coupe

1968 Impala SS
Kager67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 12:13 AM   #20
GREASEMONKEY72
Registered User
 
GREASEMONKEY72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 7,893
Re: Rear Gear

i have 3.07's with a stock rebuilt tranny so its the stock converter and it takes off good for the engine being stock and it cruzes really good and its nice to drive on the freeway and i can haul ass if i want to, so i would recommend the 3.07's but no lower then 3.73's
__________________
-steven
Alte Seele S.S.

"Allison" '72 C/10 LWB 350SB/TH350 - DD

PITBULL IS NOT A CRIME
GREASEMONKEY72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 06:45 PM   #21
69GMCLonghorn
Registered User
 
69GMCLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Porter Ranch, CA
Posts: 978
Re: Rear Gear

Overdrive is definitely where it's at, more so than the rear end gear. If you're spending the money on a different rear end, posi, and the right gears, probably decent tires, why not get 4.10 gears and invest in a 700R4?? You get the best of both worlds. A friend of mine swapped a TH350 for a 700 and gained 5 MPG in a 400 HP Nova. It had all the low end the tires could handle and cruised at 110 at just over 3000.
69GMCLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 06:50 PM   #22
GREASEMONKEY72
Registered User
 
GREASEMONKEY72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 7,893
Re: Rear Gear

110 at a little over 3k, sweet
__________________
-steven
Alte Seele S.S.

"Allison" '72 C/10 LWB 350SB/TH350 - DD

PITBULL IS NOT A CRIME
GREASEMONKEY72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007, 07:35 AM   #23
mnunn454
Registered User
 
mnunn454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 602
Re: Rear Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69GMCLonghorn View Post
Overdrive is definitely where it's at, more so than the rear end gear. If you're spending the money on a different rear end, posi, and the right gears, probably decent tires, why not get 4.10 gears and invest in a 700R4?? You get the best of both worlds. A friend of mine swapped a TH350 for a 700 and gained 5 MPG in a 400 HP Nova. It had all the low end the tires could handle and cruised at 110 at just over 3000.

__________________
69 C-10 SWB Fleetside 454/TH400 (For Sale)
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/c...ct=1299&cat=12
70 El Camino 454 TH700
29 Model A 4-DR Sedan Deluxe
mnunn454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com