The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2008, 07:26 AM   #1
Albatrossian
Georgia Boy
 
Albatrossian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Douglas, Georgia
Posts: 370
Question Intake question!

I'm considering putting on a new intake and wanted to ask ya'll your opinions/experiences on them. What intakes have ya'll used and did you notice a difference in power after the swap? Did you go from dual plane to single and what brand did you go with? I'm running a Performer now and I'm considering going to a Weiand Street Warrior. I'll still be using my trusty 780 QJet since it's pretty new. Thanks!

Last edited by Albatrossian; 10-10-2008 at 07:27 AM.
Albatrossian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 07:52 AM   #2
bigblock73
yeller
 
bigblock73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 13,824
Re: Intake question!

I have always used Edelbrock manifolds, performer RPM or Air Gap. Have been satisfied with every one.
bigblock73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 07:54 AM   #3
Albatrossian
Georgia Boy
 
Albatrossian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Douglas, Georgia
Posts: 370
Re: Intake question!

Did you notice a difference in power between them, Jeff?
__________________
81 GMC High Sierra, 2WD, 357ci/700R4, 3.73s, posi.
Albatrossian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 08:58 AM   #4
tvblazer78
Low & Fast!
 
tvblazer78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,110
Re: Intake question!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albatrossian View Post
Did you notice a difference in power between them, Jeff?

The big thing is what are you needing, low end or top end? RPM is on the top end and performer is lower.
tvblazer78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 09:20 AM   #5
boatpuller
Registered User
 
boatpuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sun City West, Az
Posts: 3,822
Re: Intake question!

iv'e used both performers and i'm currently running an air gap.i can't say i can tell a difference.however,the airgap looks cooler.so,if it doesn't make a big diff in foot pedal feel,i'll lean towards cool.
__________________
" Never look up a dead dogs butt."
boatpuller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 09:25 AM   #6
75sierraclassic
Registered User
 
75sierraclassic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 186
Re: Intake question!

Get a Performer RPM. It will do better than a Performer at the low end and high end. Hot Rod magazine has done quiet a few comparisons and they always end up with the Performer RPM or the RPM Air-Gap. The Air-Gap is the best manifold for performance, but unless you have a big block or a serious engine it is so marginal over the RPM that it doesn't warrant the cost increase.
75sierraclassic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 10:40 AM   #7
87Lowrider
Navy Radioman Veteran
 
87Lowrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 1,356
Re: Intake question!

Quote:
Originally Posted by boatpuller View Post
iv'e used both performers and i'm currently running an air gap.i can't say i can tell a difference.however,the airgap looks cooler.so,if it doesn't make a big diff in foot pedal feel,i'll lean towards cool.
I agree with "cool".. I'm very impressed with the performance of mine too. I've only had my foot in it a couple times since I got it running but I'm still working the bugs out of the fuel pump, but MAN, she it stout.

87Lowrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 10:47 AM   #8
boatpuller
Registered User
 
boatpuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sun City West, Az
Posts: 3,822
Re: Intake question!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 87Lowrider View Post
I agree with "cool".. I'm very impressed with the performance of mine too. I've only had my foot in it a couple times since I got it running but I'm still working the bugs out of the fuel pump, but MAN, she it stout.

that engine compartment is cool.....look's really nice.
__________________
" Never look up a dead dogs butt."
boatpuller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 10:04 PM   #9
Albatrossian
Georgia Boy
 
Albatrossian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Douglas, Georgia
Posts: 370
Re: Intake question!

I'm going for low end.. I will be drag racing the truck, but it's not going to be a total race truck. I've never ran a single plane, so I was wondering if any of ya'll have.
__________________
81 GMC High Sierra, 2WD, 357ci/700R4, 3.73s, posi.
Albatrossian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 10:53 PM   #10
84 400
Sb 400 club
 
84 400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NH / MA
Posts: 2,746
Re: Intake question!

I have a preformer II on mine. In every test I have read the Air gap always comes out on top. Best for the money kinda deal. So if it where me I would try the air gap.

Have herd some good things about weiland too.
__________________
1984 chevy c10, built 400sb,.(SOLD)
77 K10 Project / daily driver "The Grinch" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=318363
1956 Willys Wagon (327 chevy) Project (Now Buick 225)
1980 Corvette L-48 4 speed
1992 Mustang GT built 5.0 5 speed

1985 C10 LWB Sold
1982 K10 SWB plow truck Parted out
1986 D30 M1028 fire brush truck Parted out
84 400 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 12:04 AM   #11
ca180
tryin to get laid
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 198
Re: Intake question!

I've got the edelbrock eps (dual plane), but since the v8 swap I don't think I've even got the secondaries open.... Hasn't been legal since 06/05! Damn

Anyhow, If I did things different I might throw down on an air gap... or even save all my mullah for an LS motor.... But all in all, I think you should be ok with whatever you chose, all these intakes (brand name) are good these days. Just match your mods
ca180 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 10:08 PM   #12
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: Intake question!

I have veen using the Edelbrock intakes for quite some time. The Edelbrock Performer is a dual plane intake with a 500 RPM to 5500 RPM band for performance. The Performer RPM inatkes move that power band up to 1500 RPM to 6500 RPM. I chose the Performer, this last time, because if I am going to get serious with the acceleration, I will bring my RPMs up to about 1500 before really starting. I don't really know of many that just just on the gas with the tranny engaged at 500 RPMs, so the lower power band is virtually useless in my mind. My stroker motor runs quite well for me and has one heck of a bite at the 2000 to 2500 RPM area.
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2008, 10:54 PM   #13
manimal
Registered User
 
manimal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Kalifornia
Posts: 3,066
Re: Intake question!

I have very good luck with Weiand Stealth intakes. And the old Holley Street Dominator was a Z/28 replica and worked GREAT! Good Luck with your choice.
-Lance
__________________
------------------------------------------------------
-Lance
2000 Chevy C2500, 5.7, 4L80e
1999 Suburban K2500, 7.4, 4L80e
1980 Camaro..son's car...PROJECT
manimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 11:52 AM   #14
grinch4om
dang its hot
 
grinch4om's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: frankfort kentucky
Posts: 1,349
Re: Intake question!

stay away from a single plane unless the converter is real loose and you are zinging the motor, remember you need low end torque to move mass...pure physics, performer RPM is probably the best compromise for a street/strip vehicle
grinch4om is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2008, 03:31 PM   #15
Albatrossian
Georgia Boy
 
Albatrossian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Douglas, Georgia
Posts: 370
Re: Intake question!

It's a 357(350, 40 over), 2.02 heads, ported/polished, Crane Powermax H278, 460/480 lift, Hooker long tubes with 1-5/8" primaries and 3" collectors, 780 QJet, 10:1 compression, Keith Black cast flattops, and the Performer intake. It's got a 700R4 trans with a stock converter, 3.73 gears with a stock posi. I've got a set of Crane roller rockers I am going to throw on it, thinking on going to a 1.6 ratio on the exhaust.
__________________
81 GMC High Sierra, 2WD, 357ci/700R4, 3.73s, posi.
Albatrossian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 10:57 AM   #16
454HO
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,223
Re: Intake question!

Okay, so the Performer may not be the best match for the rest of your combo. An Edelbrock RPM, RPM Airgap or maybe the Weiand Air Strike might help some in the upper rpm range, but they probably won't help much down low. That 278 cam (222/234) has a 2200-6200 rpm power band. Not exactly good for low end torque... but your gearing is pretty good with the 700r4 and 3.73 gears.

If it were mine, I would get a good torque converter. Not some cheap off the shelf converter. Something like a Vigilante or Street Edge . Just call them up and give them your specs, they will custom design a converter for you. I'm guessing probably around 3200-3400 stall speed. If you keep the lock-up then your highway cruise rpm won't change. But you will definately feel a difference in the launch.
__________________
- Greg
454HO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 11:00 AM   #17
Albatrossian
Georgia Boy
 
Albatrossian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Douglas, Georgia
Posts: 370
Re: Intake question!

Hmm.. so maybe an intake AND a cam swap.. it's an 1/8 mile track here, so top end doesn't really count as much..
__________________
81 GMC High Sierra, 2WD, 357ci/700R4, 3.73s, posi.
Albatrossian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 12:17 PM   #18
454HO
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,223
Re: Intake question!

Advancing the cam 4° would give you a bit more on the low end.

I still think a good converter would be the best bang for your buck. What is your current 60' time?
__________________
- Greg
454HO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 01:22 PM   #19
Albatrossian
Georgia Boy
 
Albatrossian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Douglas, Georgia
Posts: 370
Re: Intake question!

I haven't been on the track with it yet.. I've wiped out 3rd and 4th. I'm thinking it should be in the mid 2s with wheelspin.
__________________
81 GMC High Sierra, 2WD, 357ci/700R4, 3.73s, posi.
Albatrossian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 04:30 PM   #20
Hoods69BadBowTie
Chevys Kick A$$
 
Hoods69BadBowTie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Zootown, MT
Posts: 12,699
Re: Intake question!

I got the performer on my Blazer and I really like it no major complaints all around good performance.
__________________
*HOODS is what I answer too*
-'79, '77, '88 Pickup Sold, '85 Camaro, '83 T/A, '81,'83,'90 K5 Blazer All Sold
-'79 3/4 ton "Big Yellow Bananna" Lifted 4spd. 39.5 TSL Swampers, The money Pit
-'86 K5 Blazer Silverado 6.2 4" lift 35"s
-'95 Ext. Cab Shorty 4" Tuff Country rolling 35" M/T's
-'83 Monte Carlo T-Tops. 126,500 Original Miles
-LATER
I would rather push a Chevy then drive a ford!!
Hoods69BadBowTie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com