Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
02-02-2010, 09:42 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 643
|
Better for HWY driving?
k5 or suburban? I have never driven either... just my lowly c10. So I'm still looking for a suitable family squarebody. Which one is more suited for a comfortable cruising? I'm going to assume the 'burb 2WD, but I wanted to ask to make sure.
|
02-02-2010, 10:22 AM | #2 |
I know the pieces fit
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
The extra weight of the burb helps and hurts. It does go down the road nice but it's not the rig you'd want to be in to do an accident-avoidance manuever. Those extra doors are nice to have, though. The Blazer rides well, but either one will come down to the suspension and tire/wheel combo you choose. It's hard to go wrong.
|
02-02-2010, 11:30 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 643
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
I found a nice 2wd. I wanted a 4wd, but what would a good wheel/tire size setup be for a 2wd burb?
275/60-15 and 15x8 on all fours? Last edited by Tony_SS; 02-02-2010 at 12:18 PM. |
02-02-2010, 11:46 AM | #4 |
I know the pieces fit
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
I like the 275/60's on 15's because you get good width and get to keep a 28" tall tire. The 295/50's look good but they're 26-point-something inches tall - just a tad short for me. 15x8's fit the 275's best.
|
02-02-2010, 03:28 PM | #5 |
my short bus
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: fredericksburg,Va
Posts: 307
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
I drove mine stock with 31"s and loved it now that its bagged and lowered
with 255/70/15 on rallie's rides like a dream cruises great on the highway too
__________________
**90 burb**bagged,shaved**(about done)********* **91 burb**stock worker for now**************** *********only squares for me****************** |
02-03-2010, 12:45 AM | #6 |
Chevys Kick A$$
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Zootown, MT
Posts: 12,699
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
I have had a few K5 Blazers and loved them all. They have all been 4x4s though. They rode nice and had a good amount of room in them still. The burbs are nice but kinda big if you actually don't need all that room.
__________________
*HOODS is what I answer too* -'79, '77, '88 Pickup Sold, '85 Camaro, '83 T/A, '81,'83,'90 K5 Blazer All Sold -'79 3/4 ton "Big Yellow Bananna" Lifted 4spd. 39.5 TSL Swampers, The money Pit -'86 K5 Blazer Silverado 6.2 4" lift 35"s -'95 Ext. Cab Shorty 4" Tuff Country rolling 35" M/T's -'83 Monte Carlo T-Tops. 126,500 Original Miles -LATER I would rather push a Chevy then drive a ford!!
|
02-03-2010, 09:59 AM | #7 |
Slots go on anything!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 5,957
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
If you plan on towing anything, you will appreciate the extra wheelbase of the Sub. Towing with a lifted 4x4 Blazer sucks.
__________________
1974 Jimmy- 5.3/4L80e/NP241 |
02-03-2010, 11:07 AM | #8 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
Having had Blazers and Burbs, I suggest the Burb. As much as I love squares, I would look at 92-98's if your budget allows.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" Last edited by N2TRUX; 02-03-2010 at 11:07 AM. |
02-03-2010, 07:04 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 643
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
|
02-03-2010, 09:43 PM | #10 |
my short bus
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: fredericksburg,Va
Posts: 307
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
better ride and creature comfort inside
__________________
**90 burb**bagged,shaved**(about done)********* **91 burb**stock worker for now**************** *********only squares for me****************** |
02-03-2010, 11:09 PM | #11 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
The 92-98 Burb platform is a huge advancement over the 88-91's. The ride, seats, power, and brakes are much better. In 96 they added the Vortec motor which was more powerful and efficient than the TBI.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
02-05-2010, 11:28 AM | #12 |
I know the pieces fit
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
If you go that route, the four-door Tahoe/Yukon is a good "in-between" truck. These trucks are as easy to work on as the squares but they are significantly more refined.
|
01-11-2011, 09:10 AM | #13 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,047
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
Quote:
As far as breaking down, there are probably more parts in junkyards for the '88 - '98 than the squares. Squarebody trucks are getting to be like Corvettes - parts are becoming harder to find and folks that have what you need are only too happy to charge two prices for 'em. I had a '99 'burb, loved the ride, now I have a '97 2-door 4x4, best riding and driving 4x4 I've ever owned. |
|
02-08-2010, 01:21 AM | #14 | |
p p pullin'
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: oshawa ontario
Posts: 373
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
Quote:
Get a carb 2wd Sub with a decent running 350, a 700r4 and a free flowing dual exhaust system and youll be kocking on the door of 20mpg hwy easy
__________________
doug |
|
02-03-2010, 11:03 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 42
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
Yeah I admit my burb rides like a lumber wagon with the leaf spring setup in the front for the 4x4 and as for creature comforts atleast my 91 Has power mirrors.
I almost got a 99 burb but the guy backed out on the sale. Leather with heated seats and front/rear a/c low miles..
__________________
1999 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 4x4 - 454, 4L80E and lots of other fun options 1967 Chevrolet C10 Longbox Stepside - Restored 1991 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 4x4 - 350, 4L80E - Not dead but severly crippled 1987 GMC Suburban 1500 - Now some retired guy's trailer hauler 1992 Lumina Z34 - I'll miss that PITA |
02-03-2010, 11:07 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 643
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
Do the 2wd burbs ride that much nicer with the coil spring setup? If that's the case, I might lean that direction.
|
02-03-2010, 11:23 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: la
Posts: 345
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
I have an 83 2wd suburban. I have driven both 4wd and 2wd square trucks...but nothing rides like the sub. I have since driven it cross country multiple times and average better than 20 while drafting semi's. The ride is comfortable, you just ahve to drive safe and be defensive cuz that thing would much rather drive through something than around.
plus everyone at my school loves the fact that its older than a 95 beamer and can go anywhere, anytime, with alot of people comfortably |
02-05-2010, 01:29 AM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Jefferson, OH
Posts: 999
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
We have an '88 4x4 Burb as the family hauler, wouldn't trade it for anything newer. It's lifted and the ride is firm, but it's built for what we use it for. My wife drives it everyday and we drive it on all of our out of state trips. Of course the 2wd's ride much nicer. My Blazer isn't nearly as useful for family duties... and we need six seats now.
|
02-08-2010, 12:49 AM | #19 |
p p pullin'
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: oshawa ontario
Posts: 373
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
Look far ahead with the plans for the truck and know your local smog laws......If your going to tow the 350 tbi is a dog and that set up is dicey to make signifigant power increases......in my case our smog laws dont allow you to switch from tbi to carb (which I didnt know till after I bought the truck....duh).....I want somewhere in the nieghbourhood of 400hp so I had to sell my 88 tbi and bought a carb 85 so I can make some power.....I have an alum head carb 406 almost done....it is not a daily driver though.....D
__________________
doug |
01-13-2011, 06:58 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wilsonville Or
Posts: 705
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
WAY OLD thread... but since for some reason people are still commenting so I will too. This one is for sale right now, looks very similar to your avatar... Maybe it's your twin.
|
01-13-2011, 09:20 PM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 27
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
It really depends on exactly what you plan on doing with it. I run a '91 2wd with the Regency package and, for an "around the town" or highway vehicle, its great. It rides just like my '74 Sedan DeVille! A bit tough to find a parking spot in downtown though.
I would look for a TBI model if I were you, they get better mileage, are easy to upgrade, and offer better drive-ability at any altitude/attitude. They are also really simple, easier than dealing with a carb IMHO. The downside to the 2wd is it's off road performance but it's not bad by any means if you run suitable tires and don't get WAY off the beaten path. They can also be just as economical as any small to medium SUV with proper maintenance. With a little bit of modification mine gets 23-25 mpg, with the same mods my old '89 4x4 got 18-22 mpg. Both were automatics and the 4x4 had 32x11.50 BF Goodrich T/A KO's and went anywhere I pointed it on road or off! Both of mine tow a small 4 horse trailer or the 26' pontoon boat just fine as long as I don't try to do more than about 65 mph and STAY OUT OF OVERDRIVE! The 700r4 trans is a little weak on OD and you will burn it up if you try to tow much of anything in top gear. A transmission cooler (NOT the one in the radiator) is a must for these trannys. Most of the ones I see already have one but make sure you put one in if not, they are cheap and easy insurance especially compared to a $1200-1500 transmission overhaul! Wow just saw the date on this! Oh well maybe somebody will get use out of it. And as far as parts go Texas has plenty of them used and the parts houses still stock most stuff new. I redid my entire brake system from the soft lines to the pads and a new MC for $145, ALL new parts, even the calipers and wheel cylinders. The cheapest way though is to buy a parts truck, if you have the room. Last edited by Space Truckin'; 01-13-2011 at 09:34 PM. |
01-13-2011, 09:39 PM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wilsonville Or
Posts: 705
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
Just to clarify to everyone "TONY SS" has bought a '91 4wd Suburban...
This thread is 11 1/2 months old! ** EDIT **I stand corrected I was wrong - oops! lol who is laughing now! Last edited by Mkcustums; 01-14-2011 at 02:49 PM. |
01-14-2011, 10:15 AM | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 643
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
|
01-14-2011, 12:24 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wilsonville Or
Posts: 705
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
That I didn't know. What happened with the '91 you bought? Any plans you are considering for the 2wd?
|
01-14-2011, 02:25 PM | #25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 643
|
Re: Better for HWY driving?
I looked at a couple but never bought them, due to the fact the sellers were not honest. Yes, I want to do a 2wd with a 2/4 drop.. nothing radical, just something nicer than a beater than can handle a good turn.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|