The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain > LSx Swaps

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-20-2012, 12:17 AM   #1
laynrockers
Registered User
 
laynrockers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: las vegas nevada
Posts: 218
Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

Hey guys.

Been doing my reading and starting to look into an LS swap for my 66 c-10. I know a lot of you have already been down this road and wanted to get your feedback and perspective before I pull the trigger on a motor. The build for my truck includes a full porterbuilt front and rear drop member with ls motor swap, I plan on driving the truck all the time and using as a second to my daily.

I am looking for a low miles (motor/tranny) combo that can easily be upgraded. (thinking turbos down the road) After looking into the options I am leaning towards going with a 04 trailblazer 5.3 with 4l60E from Spaulding Auto in Spokane Wa. They sell the motor with brand new long block ( zero miles), rebuilt trans turn key ready to fire with all the accessories, cracked computer, harness, ect. for about $5000.

AAAnd they give you a warranty

I would like to hear from you guys on what you decided and why. What upgrades did you do, how much did it costs vs. HP gain. And would love to learn from your own research.

Also what is the consensus on the 5.3 aluminum block vs. the 6.0 cast iron bloack in relation to aftermarket performance/ this build??

thanks
laynrockers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 01:37 AM   #2
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

My butt squeaks when I walk....so I opted for a used 5.3 , in a wrecked truck. The parts left over , will pretty much pay for the engine, & I can spend the bucks on the harness, & fuel system just getting started, so I cant help much on cost projection, but alum vs iron block,I take the iron block anytime I have heard it said ,that you can "punch" an iron 5.3 to 5.7 spec, without issues? crazyL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 03:37 PM   #3
gringoloco
A guy with a truck
 
gringoloco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

If you wanna do the work to pull it, a wrecked truck is the way to go. Should he able to find an engine/trans combo for around $1k.

5.3 can be safely bored to a 5.7, just swap pistons- rods and crank are common between the two motors...
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
-Chris

Instagram _elgringoloco_

'70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10
‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd
'72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD)
'72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD)
'05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD)
‘07 Yukon Denali (daily)

Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy
gringoloco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 04:29 PM   #4
85burb
Registered User
 
85burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lindale,tx
Posts: 2,373
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

Quote:
Originally Posted by gringoloco View Post
If you wanna do the work to pull it, a wrecked truck is the way to go. Should he able to find an engine/trans combo for around $1k.

5.3 can be safely bored to a 5.7, just swap pistons- rods and crank are common between the two motors...
Posted via Mobile Device
By the time you do that you will have more in it then a 6.0 or 6.2 would cost. If you want performance get a 6.0. They have a iron block for when you do the turbos.
__________________
82 c10 5.3/4l60
84 c20 5.3/sm465
85 chevy k10 suburban LQ4/4l60
91 chevy c10 suburban Lsa 5.3/4l60
2017 Silverado whipple 5.3
1964 Vw beetle
1974 vw beetle
85burb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 10:21 PM   #5
softballnrd27
Always a work in progress
 
softballnrd27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 1,599
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

Go to ls1tech and look in the forced induction section
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
USMC Retired
Never trust a man who can't laugh at his own fart!
2010 Silverado Crew Cab
73 SWB 5.3/4l80e
Build Thread:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=695168
softballnrd27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 04:30 PM   #6
gringoloco
A guy with a truck
 
gringoloco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

Agreed.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
-Chris

Instagram _elgringoloco_

'70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10
‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd
'72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD)
'72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD)
'05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD)
‘07 Yukon Denali (daily)

Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy
gringoloco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 06:15 PM   #7
mooseknuckles
Registered User
 
mooseknuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: ottawa,canada
Posts: 4,550
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

and the lq4 has less compression than the lq9....
mooseknuckles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 09:31 PM   #8
laynrockers
Registered User
 
laynrockers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: las vegas nevada
Posts: 218
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

They also have a 6.0 from and 01 2500hd. claims only has 8500 miles on the motor. comes prepared to drop in like the other. Would this be better in your opinion with the iron block for a twin turbo application?

They want $400 more for this one.

Also I was searching a couldn't find a good clean build thread with someone who turbo'd one of these motors in detail. Can any of you point me in that direction for more hints and detail.

Thanks
laynrockers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 11:12 PM   #9
85burb
Registered User
 
85burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lindale,tx
Posts: 2,373
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

Quote:
Originally Posted by laynrockers View Post
They also have a 6.0 from and 01 2500hd. claims only has 8500 miles on the motor. comes prepared to drop in like the other. Would this be better in your opinion with the iron block for a twin turbo application?

They want $400 more for this one.

Also I was searching a couldn't find a good clean build thread with someone who turbo'd one of these motors in detail. Can any of you point me in that direction for more hints and detail.

Thanks
That sounds like a winner to me as long as it is not the cast iron heads the early ones had. i forget the years they had them.
__________________
82 c10 5.3/4l60
84 c20 5.3/sm465
85 chevy k10 suburban LQ4/4l60
91 chevy c10 suburban Lsa 5.3/4l60
2017 Silverado whipple 5.3
1964 Vw beetle
1974 vw beetle
85burb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2012, 11:47 PM   #10
gringoloco
A guy with a truck
 
gringoloco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

Cast iron were on 99-00. Still not a bad flowing head. '01-up have 317 aluminum castings that are similar ports to z06/ls6 heads with a larger combustion chamber.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
-Chris

Instagram _elgringoloco_

'70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10
‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd
'72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD)
'72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD)
'05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD)
‘07 Yukon Denali (daily)

Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy
gringoloco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 04:56 PM   #11
laynrockers
Registered User
 
laynrockers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: las vegas nevada
Posts: 218
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

It is from an 01 2500. I have been reading through the LS forums and made a post, not to many educated responses yet. But everyone is saying the 4l60E wont hold up and to try and get a 4l80e.
laynrockers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 05:21 PM   #12
85burb
Registered User
 
85burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lindale,tx
Posts: 2,373
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

For sure get the 4l80e. They 4l60e will need to be built pretty stout to hold up for long. When you get to the turbo stage 4l60 will not hold up long. Do it right the first time and get the 4l80e. Wish i did.
__________________
82 c10 5.3/4l60
84 c20 5.3/sm465
85 chevy k10 suburban LQ4/4l60
91 chevy c10 suburban Lsa 5.3/4l60
2017 Silverado whipple 5.3
1964 Vw beetle
1974 vw beetle
85burb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 07:18 PM   #13
69trk
Registered User
 
69trk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: bridgecreek ok.
Posts: 1,214
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

I was going to go with a 4l80e, but in order for one to hold the power i'm intending on making i couldn't justify the cost. So i had a turbo 400 built to handle over 1000hp and i have $1100 in it vs $3500.in the 4l80... I can drive for quite a few years before the benefits of the 4l80 helps on fuel...jmo. Plus with the turbo, you can go with 3.23's or something like that....
__________________
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=494388

431 big block times, changed to a 6.0 ls with turbo
1.58- 60'
7.18- 1/8th mile@95.18
11.37- 1/4 @115.81
69trk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 08:04 PM   #14
85burb
Registered User
 
85burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lindale,tx
Posts: 2,373
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

I agree with that as long as you dont want overdrive. The 4l80 is just a new version of a 400 with overdrive.
__________________
82 c10 5.3/4l60
84 c20 5.3/sm465
85 chevy k10 suburban LQ4/4l60
91 chevy c10 suburban Lsa 5.3/4l60
2017 Silverado whipple 5.3
1964 Vw beetle
1974 vw beetle
85burb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2012, 11:22 AM   #15
laynrockers
Registered User
 
laynrockers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: las vegas nevada
Posts: 218
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

What about a LQ4 with a cam package $6000 shipped with a 4l60E and 1 year warranty "drop in" motor package. less than 75k on motor and tranny.
laynrockers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 01:14 PM   #16
Number98
Prestige Worldwide
 
Number98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 2,552
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

Once you get up in cost you could get an LS2/4L70E from a Trailblazer SS for under $5k with 20,000 or less miles and have 400HP/400TQ... There is a guy in Indiana I have spoken to who sells these for $4800 all day long.
Posted via Mobile Device
Number98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 02:32 PM   #17
83_shortwide
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gilmer, TX
Posts: 29
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Number98 View Post
Once you get up in cost you could get an LS2/4L70E from a Trailblazer SS for under $5k with 20,000 or less miles and have 400HP/400TQ... There is a guy in Indiana I have spoken to who sells these for $4800 all day long.
Posted via Mobile Device
Who is this guy you speak of? Do you have a name or number?
Posted via Mobile Device
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Bo

'83 C10, LQ4, 4L80E
83_shortwide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 02:55 PM   #18
ERASER5
Registered User
 
ERASER5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,859
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

It's not me, so who is it? tap tap tap...
__________________
'70 GMC C1500 LWB
Power disc brakes. WooHoo!
Posi 6 Lug Dana 60
ERASER5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 09:37 PM   #19
laynrockers
Registered User
 
laynrockers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: las vegas nevada
Posts: 218
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Number98 View Post
Once you get up in cost you could get an LS2/4L70E from a Trailblazer SS for under $5k with 20,000 or less miles and have 400HP/400TQ... There is a guy in Indiana I have spoken to who sells these for $4800 all day long.
Posted via Mobile Device
Please send me the info, my quote for an LS2 with the tranny (both less than 75K miles) "drop in ready" form a trailblazer SS was for $7000 shipped. So i would be very interested to speak with this guy.

Thanks
laynrockers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 10:16 PM   #20
68 c10 ls2
Registered User
 
68 c10 ls2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 157
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

I have a used 02 6.0(75k) with a used 4l80e(54k), new heads, new cam and a maggie 112 with 102mm throttle body(600+hp) and i have less than $5k into all of it. If your looking to throw anything over 10psi of boost with the turbos the stock bottoms ends dont hold up to long. If your thinking of huge boost numbers look at the 4.8 block. Hot Rod Mag did a test on a stock 4.8 (what they 1st thought was a 5.3 block). They through over 30psi at the stock block and was able to get 1100hp on the dyno(stronger/thicker side walls).
68 c10 ls2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 11:50 PM   #21
laynrockers
Registered User
 
laynrockers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: las vegas nevada
Posts: 218
Re: Which LS(x) to choose and aftermarket performance..

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68 c10 ls2 View Post
I have a used 02 6.0(75k) with a used 4l80e(54k), new heads, new cam and a maggie 112 with 102mm throttle body(600+hp) and i have less than $5k into all of it. If your looking to throw anything over 10psi of boost with the turbos the stock bottoms ends dont hold up to long. If your thinking of huge boost numbers look at the 4.8 block. Hot Rod Mag did a test on a stock 4.8 (what they 1st thought was a 5.3 block). They through over 30psi at the stock block and was able to get 1100hp on the dyno(stronger/thicker side walls).
I WAS thinking conservative 6-8 pds. of boost. Most recently I have come to the conclusion to throw a Cam intake possibly heads tune and call it a day. The turbo would be for much later down the road if i got board. But a nice Daily driver type of motor is what I am really looking for, would like to get over 400 to the wheels.

I will look into some motor combos with the above I am sure that is achievable without forced induction.

any recommendations?
laynrockers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com