Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
06-07-2013, 12:59 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: chillicothe, illinois
Posts: 690
|
to x pipe or nt to x pipe
Still trying to get the 70 to work to build the exhaust system. 3" rom the headers back for my 468. Should I put in a x pipe or not? I have never been a big fan of them but was thinking of trying one. Any thoughts?
|
06-07-2013, 04:29 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Clarksville TN/ Ft.Campbell
Posts: 95
|
Re: to x pipe or nt to x pipe
Id run a X pip. with the power your making youll want duals. Im running tsp X pipe duals on my camaro and I Love it. Totally different than a Y pipe
__________________
2002 Camaro SS- AI Ported 92MM FAST / AI 226CC CNC'd 243's / Built T-56 / Moser 9 / T-Rex / 150 shot in the works / 6LE CME SLP # 1716, 6-speed, Tan interior. 1970 C10 SWB, 250ci, 3 on the tree http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1uw3TJhw2Q |
06-07-2013, 04:33 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: WEST PALM FLORIDA
Posts: 1,174
|
Re: to x pipe or nt to x pipe
h pipe will give you more horsepower and torqe , and mello even out your exhaust tone at idle
|
06-07-2013, 05:03 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brooklyn N.Y.
Posts: 819
|
Re: to x pipe or nt to x pipe
Quote:
Clearance is the only draw back, but if you can fit an X i would recommend putting one.
__________________
1967 GMC Suburban, Supercharged 6.2 LS with a 6l80e , my 11 second tow vehicle! *pic in my profile* 1987 GMC CrewCab Dually 6.0 LS/6L90e, new tow pig. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/gallery/...=74049&cat=500 |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|