The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-09-2014, 10:04 AM   #1
ksucatz
Suppose to be workin........
 
ksucatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Shawnee, KS USA
Posts: 164
68 vs 72 steering column

OK guys, got a question for you. I picked up a '72 ( I think) steering column from Randy a while back, and am finally getting ready to clean up and put in my '68. So, as I was pulling the one out of the 68, I notice it is a single long shaft design, and the new one is a 2 piece (I only have the upper piece too ).
I bought the newer column for the three speed stops and my shift collar where the lever mounts was broke. Could not move the tube back and forth to get past the stops.

What was the last year for the 1 piece shaft? I am pretty sure the lower bearing is different according to LMC catalog, so maybe that is the breakoff for the design change?

So, is the 2 piece a better design in anyone's opinion? Do I need to find the lower shaft, or do I just take what is needed from the newer column and place into the older column and use the long shaft?

Thanks for the help
__________________
Brent
'68 C10
'70 C10
'72 LeMans
"03 Trailblazer
"Stupidity is like a skill, some are born with it and some develop it over a period of time."" Author unknown
ksucatz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 12:10 PM   #2
Steve Cole
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Faith,NC
Posts: 1,626
Re: 68 vs 72 steering column

Can you post pics of both so we can see what you are talking about?
Steve Cole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 12:30 PM   #3
ksucatz
Suppose to be workin........
 
ksucatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Shawnee, KS USA
Posts: 164
Re: 68 vs 72 steering column

Yes, but it will have to be this evening when I get home from work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Cole View Post
Can you post pics of both so we can see what you are talking about?
__________________
Brent
'68 C10
'70 C10
'72 LeMans
"03 Trailblazer
"Stupidity is like a skill, some are born with it and some develop it over a period of time."" Author unknown
ksucatz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 01:25 PM   #4
Classic Heartbeat
Project Junkie! Fishing Poor!!
 
Classic Heartbeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Olympia,Wa. 98512
Posts: 10,766
Re: 68 vs 72 steering column

Quote:
What was the last year for the 1 piece shaft? I am pretty sure the lower bearing is different according to LMC catalog, so maybe that is the breakoff for the design change?
To answer your question 1968. The 67 and 68 were the only year they used these columns. 66 and earlier were single piece but different design.
Quote:
So, is the 2 piece a better design in anyone's opinion?
No not necessarily, just easier to find parts for.
Quote:
Do I need to find the lower shaft
Yes you do. You can't just cut what you need from your old 68 column. WES
__________________
On-line catolog
Classic Heartbeat Pickup Parts
WEHEPP@comcast.net
Call us Toll Free (888) 338-2502
Like Us on Facebook
No appointment necessary.
72 BB Chevy Custom Deluxe / Custom Camper
67 I-6 (Soon to be 5.7 LS1) Panel
68 BB Chevy Short Bed
72 6.0 LQ9 Short Bed Chevy 4X4
Olympia's fastest growing truck parts supplier.
Olympia's home for Wayward Chevys
Classic Heartbeat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 03:34 PM   #5
crakarjax
Registered User
 
crakarjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,302
Re: 68 vs 72 steering column

Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic Heartbeat View Post
No not necessarily, just easier to find parts for.
I don't know about that, doesn't the 2 piece collapse to prevent the shaft from poking you in a head on collision?
__________________
1968 LWB C20 / AC / Wood Bed
crakarjax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2014, 11:23 PM   #6
ksucatz
Suppose to be workin........
 
ksucatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Shawnee, KS USA
Posts: 164
Re: 68 vs 72 steering column

Here are a couple pictures to show the difference in the shafts.
[IMG]IMAG1065 by ksucatz, on Flickr[/IMG]

[IMG]IMAG1066 by ksucatz, on Flickr[/IMG]

Quote:
Originally Posted by crakarjax View Post
I don't know about that, doesn't the 2 piece collapse to prevent the shaft from poking you in a head on collision?
I think this long shaft still allows for it to collapse in case of an accident. The force should shear the plastic pins that hold this together, and then it will collapse.
[IMG]IMAG1067 by ksucatz, on Flickr[/IMG]

Thanks Wes for confirming what I was assuming.
So, I guess I either need to get a lower shaft for the newer column, or put the old long shaft into the new column if it will fit.
__________________
Brent
'68 C10
'70 C10
'72 LeMans
"03 Trailblazer
"Stupidity is like a skill, some are born with it and some develop it over a period of time."" Author unknown
ksucatz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com