The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2015, 08:39 AM   #1
65standard
Registered User
 
65standard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Coal City, IL
Posts: 695
1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

I have two engines available for my 85 C/10. One is from a '97 trans-am 5.7 LT1. The other is from a 2000 Chevy 2500 6.0 LS. Both are complete with everything needed for a swap. I am leaning toward the 6.0 because it has a 300Hp rating while the LT1 is at 275Hp. I also believe the 6.0 can easily be upgraded to 400Hp like the newer LS3. What do you guys think?




__________________
Tony Nicholas @ Midwest Metal Masters

1953 Chevy 3100 392 Hemi w/727 & 9” Ford
1985 Chevy C/10 6.0L 4L80 373 locker
65standard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 08:57 AM   #2
durty harry
Registered User
 
durty harry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gainesville, Fl
Posts: 178
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

The LT1 was fine in its day , aside from the optispark was junk and the reverse cooling system being not so liked and depending on what year motor it is , being prior to 96 you have to deal with the OBD 1 system .
I would say go with the 6.0 hands down the best of the 2 .
__________________
Scott
82 step side aka " Bouncy "
73 GMC
Long bed Vortec 5.7
durty harry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 10:18 AM   #3
MikeB
Senior Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,597
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

Heck, I'd use an L98 before an LT1, due to the LT1's reverse cooling and Opti-spark. Both will bolt-in with fewer mods to the truck than an LS requires. However, neither one has the power potential of a 6.0 liter LS engine. And that potential is virtually unlimited, even using stock Chevy parts.
__________________
Mike
1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 35 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, recent AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes.
1982 C10 SWB -- sold
1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it!
1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming.
Retired as a factory automation products salesman.
Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop.
Member here for 24 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then!
MikeB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 10:32 AM   #4
TrybalRage
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 203
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

I'm an LT1 fan myself (1997 Camaro SS owner) but for an upgrade/swap the LS based engine has such a huge aftermarket available it really doesn't make sense to go with the LT. If you decide to upgrade (cam/heads/etc) everyone and their mother can tune for an LS computer, very very few specialize in the LT1 PCM anymore.

Only benefits would be that externally it is the same as a traditional small block so it would drop right in without special motor mounts, etc.
__________________
1985 C10 Silverado LWB LS Swapped! Other Stuff

2010 Suburban 2500 LT 4WD
TrybalRage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 11:02 AM   #5
Zane M
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 706
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

LS, no question.
Zane M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 03:47 PM   #6
65standard
Registered User
 
65standard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Coal City, IL
Posts: 695
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

Thanks guys. 6.0 LS2 it is. I'll bring the whole truck home to make sure I get everything I need for the swap.
__________________
Tony Nicholas @ Midwest Metal Masters

1953 Chevy 3100 392 Hemi w/727 & 9” Ford
1985 Chevy C/10 6.0L 4L80 373 locker
65standard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 10:08 PM   #7
TrybalRage
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 203
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

Hold on to that LT, still nothing wrong with it

Swap to a carb and traditional dizzy and you've got a solid engine for an older vehicle. All of the benefits of newer engineering with the reliability of traditional SBC.
__________________
1985 C10 Silverado LWB LS Swapped! Other Stuff

2010 Suburban 2500 LT 4WD
TrybalRage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2015, 12:05 AM   #8
mongocanfly
Post Whore

 
mongocanfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Alabama
Posts: 14,670
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

You done figured it out.no dout..LS...I'm sure you've read up on the ls swap..there's more to it than just drop it in and go
mongocanfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2015, 07:39 PM   #9
MalibuSSwagon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Weare,NH
Posts: 1,592
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

Whats wrong with the reverse cooling system? Opti I can understand, but if you put a quality one in it's fine. Lt1 was a stepping stone in the design life of the LS engines, which also use reverse cooling. My DD is a 1995 Caprice police car, I know the quirks of the Lt1. That being said, if you have access to the newer LS engine, do it. Just keep in mind you'll be spending 800 or so to install a LS in a older vehicle.
MalibuSSwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2015, 09:28 AM   #10
MikeB
Senior Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,597
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

Quote:
Originally Posted by MalibuSSwagon View Post
Whats wrong with the reverse cooling system?
Well, it certainly lets the cylinder heads run cooler and tolerates higher compression. But wouldn't it require a custom radiator for installation into an 85 pickup? Either that or a kludgey hose setup.
__________________
Mike
1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 35 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, recent AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes.
1982 C10 SWB -- sold
1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it!
1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming.
Retired as a factory automation products salesman.
Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop.
Member here for 24 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then!
MikeB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2015, 10:13 AM   #11
MalibuSSwagon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Weare,NH
Posts: 1,592
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeB View Post
Well, it certainly lets the cylinder heads run cooler and tolerates higher compression. But wouldn't it require a custom radiator for installation into an 85 pickup? Either that or a kludgey hose setup.
LS is also reverse cooling. And plenty of people, me included, have used the stock radiator in swaps. I'm willing to bet the stock LT1 hoses would line up decent.
MalibuSSwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2015, 11:25 AM   #12
Ski-me
Registered User
 
Ski-me's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colo Springs, CO
Posts: 870
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

Interesting spec on the LT1. I have a 94' LT1 Corvette engine in my boat and it's rated at 310HP. Maybe just something with the boat tuning but I wouldn't think it's that much different. Boats in 97-98 with LT1's were around 328HP.

With that said, I'd go with the 6.0L though.
__________________
- Jeff

89' K5 Blazer, 2.5" lift, 35" tires
04' GMC Yukon XL, 3/4 ton, 8.1L
Ski-me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2015, 08:14 PM   #13
lilpoindexter
Registered User
 
lilpoindexter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,134
Re: 1997 5.7 LT1 or 2000 6.0 LS motor

LS...LT1 was good only until the LS became available.


Signed;
former LT1 owner
lilpoindexter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com