The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2024, 07:31 PM   #1
alderan33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Casper, WY
Posts: 11
drive shaft woes

I need help with this one guys. It's a strange one. So I am restoring my 72 C10 and I have the bed off and have been working on the frame, front end, etc.. I have the motor out and decided to replace the u joints. No problems with them. I began reinstalling the rear section of the drive shaft (2 piece) and after securing the u joint to the rear end I attempted to bolt up the carrier bearing. And it is 1 1/2" too short to line up with the mount on the truck. I did nothing with the carrier bearing. I am stumped at why and how this could happen. The truck is a long bed. The only thing I can think of is the absence of all the extra weight from the bed makes it sit differently? I could really use some advice and I would be most appreciative of any help. Thanks!
alderan33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2024, 11:05 PM   #2
PanhandleShantyman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 41
Re: drive shaft woes

I had the same "WTH?" moment last month when I reinstalled the 2-piece drive shaft of my '69 after dropping it for the first time to replace the clutch. It was "short" at the back just as you describe, after I connected the front end of the drive shaft back to the tranny and bolted up the center support bearing bracket. But, I realized the rear section of the drive shaft can slide in and out from the back end of the center support bearing, and that had to be where I needed to make the appropriate adjustment. I guess the process of backing the drive shaft out of the differential had made it slide in at that connection point. So I just whacked the drive shaft backwards right behind the center support bearing a few times with my trusty BFH to slide it backwards until the U joint slid back enough, and hooked it back up, no further issue.
PanhandleShantyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2024, 11:17 AM   #3
alderan33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Casper, WY
Posts: 11
Re: drive shaft woes

Quote:
Originally Posted by PanhandleShantyman View Post
I had the same "WTH?" moment last month when I reinstalled the 2-piece drive shaft of my '69 after dropping it for the first time to replace the clutch. It was "short" at the back just as you describe, after I connected the front end of the drive shaft back to the tranny and bolted up the center support bearing bracket. But, I realized the rear section of the drive shaft can slide in and out from the back end of the center support bearing, and that had to be where I needed to make the appropriate adjustment. I guess the process of backing the drive shaft out of the differential had made it slide in at that connection point. So I just whacked the drive shaft backwards right behind the center support bearing a few times with my trusty BFH to slide it backwards until the U joint slid back enough, and hooked it back up, no further issue.
Much appreciated. I will give this a try. I actually had installed the rear of the drive shaft first. I will reverse the procedure and find a BFH to remedy the problem. Thanks again!
alderan33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2024, 08:07 PM   #4
Rust_never_sleeps
Senior Member
 
Rust_never_sleeps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: San Ramon,CA
Posts: 593
Re: drive shaft woes

Did you try flipping it the other way? ;-)
__________________
1970 C10 Custom longbed 350/350
Rust_never_sleeps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2024, 08:06 AM   #5
alderan33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Casper, WY
Posts: 11
Re: drive shaft woes

Yeah I still can't figure this out. I have beat on this driveshaft but it's not budging. Any other ideas?
alderan33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2024, 01:58 PM   #6
Willshook
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 74
Re: drive shaft woes

If the mount for the carrier bearing is fore/aft, there's about 1" of adjustment slots there.
Willshook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2024, 03:23 PM   #7
3drburb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kent, WA.
Posts: 856
Re: drive shaft woes

Try installing the carrier bearing with the driveshaft to the cross member first, then to the rear end.

Last edited by 3drburb; 10-15-2024 at 03:26 PM. Reason: adding
3drburb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2024, 03:30 PM   #8
sixty8HDC30
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Nunya Bizz
Posts: 83
Re: drive shaft woes

am I understanding that the splined slip joint is stuck in the compressed position? if thats the case then filling it with grease at the grease point should force it to extend.
__________________
____________________________________
1968 Chevrolet C-30 327 4spd flat bed dually 157" WB
1997 Chevrolet k1500 5.0 auto ECSB
sixty8HDC30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2024, 07:15 PM   #9
alderan33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Casper, WY
Posts: 11
Re: drive shaft woes

Yeah I still don't get it
alderan33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2024, 09:59 PM   #10
PanhandleShantyman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 41
Re: drive shaft woes

Can you slide the rear part of the axle any farther IN (forward) to that splined slip joint at the carrier bearing, or is it completely frozen?

If it's not moving at all, it seems like it's gotta just be stuck in the shortened position and I'd hit it with PB blaster, heat, hammer on it till it gives... maybe bolt the carrier bearing to the side of the house and swing on it? Was the axle lying out in the rain or something that could have got it rusted up?

If it moves but just not out far enough, jeez seems unlikely but maybe your first suspicion was correct and the carrier bearing is riding higher without bed weight on it and is therefore farther away? I guess you could get your heaviest buddy to jump on it and see if there's anything like that much play in the setup...

Do you have a picture of the situation just to make sure everybody has the right idea of what's going on?
PanhandleShantyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com