The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2003, 01:54 AM   #1
wxman1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: mt juliet, tennessee, usa
Posts: 237
Tornado or Helix?

Anyone using either of these products?

I did a search on tornado but nothing but
comments on severe weather. There was one mention
of a product called the helix. When I went to
their website...there was no part number for
our trucks. Just trying to save a little
fuel.

Jim
Mt Juliet
wxman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 02:00 AM   #2
benwantland
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 71
The general consensus on these products is that they are junk.
benwantland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 02:15 AM   #3
adamls
Gotta Startem Early
 
adamls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Amarillo, TX, USA
Posts: 364
I used one on my 99 from PowerDyne and took it off after a couple months. The truck would miss under heavy load and idle real bad. Took it off, no more problems.
__________________
67 SWB In Progress, one piece at a time, maybe 3 years I will be finished
adamls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 03:42 AM   #4
Project1970
14.1 @ 96MPH
 
Project1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,811
If they actually worked, manufacturers would use 'em. They're underenough pressure from the gov't to reduce fuel consumption that any cheap improvements with benefits like that would be installed on everything now...
__________________
Project1970 - LS1 Swap Complete!
Project1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 03:44 AM   #5
68 Suburban
Registered User
 
68 Suburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
With the price of gas going up, beware of "snake oil" cures to improve mileage.
68 Suburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 07:04 AM   #6
ChevLoRay
Old Skool Club
 
ChevLoRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
....tried the "Tornado"

I had a '96 Silverado, 5.7L Vortec. Great engine. I thought that since I was driving about 45K per year (job related) that I could tell if the device had any merit. They have a 30-day moneyback guarantee. I took it back after 2 weeks.

For one thing, the installation in my Silverado called for it to be installed ahead of the MAF sensor in the intake tube. It wouldn't go where they said to put it. I sent an email to the mfr., stating where I had put it, and they said "that is where it is supposed to be". Okay, so already it wasn't going to be where it should be for the best results.

Another thing: Consider that the device is designed to "increase turblence" in the intake, and that turbulence is supposed to increase horsepower. How? My experience has shown that smoothing out the air flow (K&N stub stack) is supposed to be more beneficial for performance. That means that eliminating turbulence is the goal. There is a place for it, in the combustion chamber. A fancy twirly device in the intake ain't gonna make the fuel mixture more turbulent in the combustion chamber. And, the twirly device ain't no supercharger, or turbocharger, or related in any way to one.

Bottom line: the Tornado is just another gimmick!

I don't have any experience with the other "helix" devices. They're designed to work with throttle bodies. A simple spacer will create a longer intake runner and do just as much, for less money, on a carbureted engine.
__________________
Member Nr. 2770

'96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed.

'69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo

The older I get, the better I was.
ChevLoRay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 10:56 AM   #7
yellowgmc
Getting cabin fever?!?!?!
 
yellowgmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: chisholm, mn
Posts: 1,679
i used one in my dakota. didn't fit right, made no difference at all. looked pretty tho.
__________________
Member of the Discs Up Front Club

1972 GMC 1500
1994 F-150 XL 4x4

Tact is for people not whitty enough to be sarcastic
yellowgmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 01:54 PM   #8
67Fleetsidedream
Wiseass secured himself a BAN
 
67Fleetsidedream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: MOON!!!
Posts: 2,282
Another infocommercial scam.


Ben
67Fleetsidedream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 11:54 PM   #9
Oborny71
Registered User
 
Oborny71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 587
I guess the swirl-torque spacers by TD performance actually add a few lbs of torque. I remeber reading a couple year old popular hotrodding mag and they tested it and it added like 3-5 ft lbs. not that much, but we take all we can get right?
__________________
67 Chevy SWB - goal of a 1,000 hp weekend cruiser
Oborny71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 12:39 AM   #10
rin68
Senior Member
 
rin68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: East Peoria, IL
Posts: 600
The Tornado is a piece of crap, simply put.

On the other hand, the Helix Power Tower does what the torando tries to do. It works very well too. Its a spacer with some thick, rifling like grooves around the I.D. of the air inlets. The Chevy truck units (TBI and Vortec) have got nothing but great reviews at work (Performance Auto in Fargo, ND) if you're interested in one call them at 701-237-4641. The only complaint we've heard is a whistle at wide open throttle and even that is and intermittent problem

Here's the Helix...
__________________
1968 C10 - 383, non-stop project
1969 Camaro - 327, bone stock family heirloom...soon to be LS/T56, Ridetech, all the goodies

Last edited by rin68; 02-28-2003 at 09:33 AM.
rin68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 02:17 AM   #11
spinning wheels
Registered User
 
spinning wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Hacienda Heights, California USA
Posts: 474
bottom line, they restrict air flow. What they claim is they help atomize fuel better, so this is supposed to help the fuel burn more complete. I thought a tuned carb was supposed to do that! They claim it increases fuel milage, this is true, cause the damn car/truck is being choked up. You might as well install a 1 barrel carb. It would slower than hell, but it would get better gas milage, that is until you burn up your valves or pistons. Well, that's just MHO
__________________
'72 GMC custom camper 350/350
spinning wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 07:24 PM   #12
Eddie H.
Registered User
 
Eddie H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Paradise TX USA
Posts: 1,200
I tried one of the helix spacers on a fuel injected vortec 350 once. I couldn't tell any difference except for the whistle noise it made at part throttle???
__________________
"Negative people always seem to have a problem for every solution"

Last edited by Eddie H.; 02-28-2003 at 10:55 PM.
Eddie H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 08:55 PM   #13
adamls
Gotta Startem Early
 
adamls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Amarillo, TX, USA
Posts: 364
My powerdyne, see above, was the same as the Helix Power Tower and I took it off just a couple months after I put it on, but if you want one for a Vortec 4.8 or 5.3 the let me know I will drop it for little $.
__________________
67 SWB In Progress, one piece at a time, maybe 3 years I will be finished
adamls is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com