Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
02-15-2008, 02:16 AM | #1 |
BlahBlahBlah
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wa.
Posts: 19,993
|
Bags and lowering blocks
If you use bags I believe Ive read you should use drop spindles too. How bout the rear, should you use lowering blocks there? How bout shock relocater kits, do you use those with bags?
|
02-15-2008, 05:23 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 6,449
|
Re: Bags and lowering blocks
If you are mounting the bags in the stock spring location the blocks will allow you to go even lower than you would otherwise go with just the bags. you'll need a bigger notch to utilize that extra drop.
Another advantage to the blocks as you eluded to is that the shock geometry is not effected by them. if you are going with bags you will need the relocators anyway because the trailing arms' travel range will include the "bad shock geometry" range. Unless you have little or no notch and run bump stops that prevent the rear susp from moving into that territory. Bottom line: You don't need blocks unless you have a big enough notch to use the extra drop. Bags, relocators, and an adjustable panhard bar will work fine. Here's one catch (there's always at least one...): I've seen guys that use the ECE Super Track Bar run into interference with their notch because it mounts under the axle saddle on the p-side arm. In that case they had to run a small ~1" block to correct that issue. Last edited by Frizzle Fry; 02-15-2008 at 05:31 AM. |
02-15-2008, 09:57 AM | #3 |
senior member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort macleod alberta
Posts: 2,770
|
Re: Bags and lowering blocks
you dont have to use drop spindles i drove mine for a year with stock drum brakes, till i saved up enough to gte drop spindles. I agree with frizzle on the block statement tho
__________________
69 GMC bagged |
02-15-2008, 10:17 AM | #4 |
1972 Chevrolet SWB
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: FT Smith AR
Posts: 512
|
Re: Bags and lowering blocks
I think the main reasons to add spindles or blocks to an already bagged set up is to get closer to lay rocker or frame.......using the spindles or blocks will just help get that extra few inches needed.
__________________
My New thread with pics (not my build thread yet.) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...46#post2573646 1972 Chevrolet 1/2 ton short wide bed,68 frt clip Project. 1980 Camaro Inherited when father passed,68K Miles 2003 Ford Mach1 FUN as Hell!! 2002 Dodge Ram 5-8 slam Rolling BillBoard (Gone not forgot) 2004 Dodge Ram HEMI 10" lifted on 37's and 2wd. |
02-15-2008, 10:29 AM | #5 |
WTB this ad
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lafayette Georgia
Posts: 5,074
|
Re: Bags and lowering blocks
I thought part of the logic of combining a bag along with a drop spindle (aside from the height) was so you can run more psi in the bags so that the truck will ride better.
Last edited by see ten; 02-15-2008 at 12:15 PM. |
02-15-2008, 02:20 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,031
|
Re: Bags and lowering blocks
Same is true for blocks in the rear. Lower air pressure does not equate to a better ride. It's all about the combination of parts.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
02-15-2008, 10:40 AM | #7 |
1972 Chevrolet SWB
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: FT Smith AR
Posts: 512
|
Re: Bags and lowering blocks
there are probably plenty of reasons and yours sounds like it is a very good reason also.
__________________
My New thread with pics (not my build thread yet.) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...46#post2573646 1972 Chevrolet 1/2 ton short wide bed,68 frt clip Project. 1980 Camaro Inherited when father passed,68K Miles 2003 Ford Mach1 FUN as Hell!! 2002 Dodge Ram 5-8 slam Rolling BillBoard (Gone not forgot) 2004 Dodge Ram HEMI 10" lifted on 37's and 2wd. |
02-15-2008, 03:08 PM | #8 |
BlahBlahBlah
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wa.
Posts: 19,993
|
Re: Bags and lowering blocks
Im on and off about the bags. I like low rides, but when you see the front tires all out of whack when they are sitting low I think it just looks stupid. I was figuring if you used dropped spindles and blocks it was a way to get lower without the camber being so crazy. Im not about laying frame, but a nicely set up cushy ride would be nice while riding low.
|
02-15-2008, 04:29 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 6,449
|
Re: Bags and lowering blocks
I have spindles and blocks with my bags FWIW. And I don't want to lay out either. Just a nice low and comfortable ride height.
|
02-15-2008, 08:52 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,031
|
Re: Bags and lowering blocks
Couldn't have said it better myself. No 'laying-out' for me..... just low & smooth as much as possible.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
02-15-2008, 10:18 PM | #11 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
|
Re: Bags and lowering blocks
I'm with Frizzle and Scoti ... I work too dang hard on my junk to go out and then drag it up and down the road. Low, but safe.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|