|
11-28-2005, 12:38 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Just outside Durham, NC
Posts: 894
|
eaton vs. corp 14
Just wondering, my 70 has the eaton rear...3/4t are ho52, and 1 tons are ho70?? I have come across a parts truck 3/4t....1982, and was wondering, if its worth it to pull the front and rear axles off of this truck, or if i would actually be trading down? In terms of strength, which is better? I have a 4x4, so the front axle is the 44hd, aside from the difficulty in finding parts, what are drawbacks, or positives to these different axles?
Why did GM switch?
__________________
1969 SS 350 Camaro Sold 2008 1970 3/4T K20, stock height with 33's, 250 I6, 3 on the tree, and locked front and rear 4.10's 1980 Chevy Malibu 2 dr Sold 2007 1993 Olds. Cutlass Ciera Wagon Traded 2006 2003 Saturn L200 w/5pd. D/D My list spans 5 decades with One common thread.....GM! |
11-28-2005, 08:24 PM | #2 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
No idea why GM switched.
Parts is a MAJOR issue on the Eatons.... and on my HO72 (one ton...and you are right HO52 is 3/4 ton, ho72 is one ton) the brakes were STUPID expensive and a real PITA to get my hands on..and this is with the best parts man in town. I would be all over a 14 bolt if I had the access/cash. Gears is another reason to go with the 14 bolt |
11-28-2005, 09:35 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE
Posts: 363
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
I'd stay with the Eaton.I have disc brakes on mine.Way better than the old drums and they only cost me $175 total.I put my own kit together. The Eaton is cooler to because everyone has a 14bolt.Just my .02
__________________
01 2500 Duramax,6spd,4x4,Not stock. Estimated 550rwhp/1100rwfp on fuel only. 03 3500 Duramax,6spd,4x4,Pac-Brake,not stock Estimated 500rwhp/1000rwfp fuel only 67 K10 in many pieces Little Brothers truck 67 K20 Cummins 12V/NV4500/205, D60/Eaton w/ Detroit,37" Xterrains,crossover steering, Future plans,Twins and lots of fuel. |
11-28-2005, 09:42 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colfax-California
Posts: 8,599
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
I like the 14 bolts myself, due to parts availability.
|
11-29-2005, 12:24 AM | #5 |
One of the First
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: St. Augustine,FL.
Posts: 4,054
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
To me the eaton was/is antiquaited with the pinion bearing loading system (the stubby bolt on the side of the third member). I had my eaton rebuilt a few years back with a new type locker and the new axles with a higher spline count. The drums are expensive but are still available (raybestos/NAPA) and all the bearings and seals. The only part I believe that is not available is the spider gears.
The 14 bolt has all parts readily available and will fit from 4x4 to 4x4 spring perches. The part that is a problem is the emergency brake brackets(so i have been told) but, you will have to modify some parts to make it work. As for durability, the eaton is combat tough while the 14 bolt is commercial tough and the Dana 60 (truck rear) is not the one you need back there out of all three. The front Dana 44 HD is the way to go for durability. The axles are bigger than a standard Dana 44. And by the way, the eaton and 14 bolt have the same OD axle shafts while the Dana 60 is smaller. Now this is what has been explained to me over the years by repital guys and know way is this a professional statement. Just passing on information, so verify before making any decisions. |
11-29-2005, 11:45 AM | #6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 215
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
Quote:
Relatively cheap easy afternoon project and the difference in braking is astounding. Haven't done it yet but have read that you can change the side gears to 14 bolt, then use slightly shortened 14 bolt axles and a 14 bolt locker.
__________________
71 K20 350/350/205, dealer air, 4" lift, Flowtech,Edel 1406 on 2101, procomp HEI,4.10's, 33x12.50x16.5 BFG MT's on slots. 4 wheel disc brakes. My lame K20 page My lame Eaton disc brake page |
|
12-04-2005, 02:31 PM | #7 | |
72 BB C30 Super LongHorn
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chavez Ravine
Posts: 1,606
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
Quote:
I would like to know what calipers you used? The brackets you used on this Eaton: Were they designed for a specific caliper? On the parking brake cables, what did you use? Which proportioning valve did you use? PIC IMAGES of your set-up? Thanx!
__________________
72 BB C/30 Longhorn Super HO72 No-Spin, #'s matching, Tilt, Tach, AC, AM/FM HO72 build : http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=714492 2017 SS |
|
12-04-2005, 02:39 PM | #8 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,411
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
RPOZ11,
DANGER, DANGER WILL ROBINSON!! I don't know what you friend is referring to, but the calipers that I have used and the ones that I have for sale are definitely LEFT and RIGHT specific. The Eldorado calipers that I have are mounted to the REAR of the bracket on both sides. The bleeder is at the top on both sides, where it should be. Something scares me about mounting one caliper on the front of the bracket and one on the rear of the same vehicle!?!?! I think your friend was sold two left handed calipers. Mounting both calipers on the rear of the bracket allows the E-Brake cable to be pulled from the front of the truck without a lot of 'gyrations' on the cable. Just my .02 72longbed |
12-04-2005, 03:11 PM | #9 |
72 BB C30 Super LongHorn
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chavez Ravine
Posts: 1,606
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
1978 Seville calipers are mounted as:
Drivers side to the front of the axle flange Passenger's side caliper to the rear of the flange I was there and removed these with him. The suggestions of the caliper swap are based upon his suggestions
__________________
72 BB C/30 Longhorn Super HO72 No-Spin, #'s matching, Tilt, Tach, AC, AM/FM HO72 build : http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=714492 2017 SS |
11-29-2005, 09:10 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Just outside Durham, NC
Posts: 894
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
isn't the corp 14 also nicknamed the 'ground scraper' or something to this effect because the pumpkin is so large?
Why is the dana 60 rear not the way to go? Is the dana 60 front worth a look? What is the difference between a corp 14 bolt in a 3/4 vs. 1ton? What is the difference between an eaton ho52 vs ho72? Thanks for all the advice!
__________________
1969 SS 350 Camaro Sold 2008 1970 3/4T K20, stock height with 33's, 250 I6, 3 on the tree, and locked front and rear 4.10's 1980 Chevy Malibu 2 dr Sold 2007 1993 Olds. Cutlass Ciera Wagon Traded 2006 2003 Saturn L200 w/5pd. D/D My list spans 5 decades with One common thread.....GM! |
12-04-2005, 02:33 PM | #11 | |
72 BB C30 Super LongHorn
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chavez Ravine
Posts: 1,606
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
Quote:
I assume braking, axle sizing, and?????
__________________
72 BB C/30 Longhorn Super HO72 No-Spin, #'s matching, Tilt, Tach, AC, AM/FM HO72 build : http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=714492 2017 SS |
|
11-29-2005, 09:32 AM | #12 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,051
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
Yes, a 14B is known as a "trencher". Off road folks usually take a grinder to them and clear off the lip on the bottom of the casting.
The early 14B's are the same from 3/4t to 1 ton. The later model trucks introduced a 1/2 and 3/4t 14B Semi-float. Uses a smaller ring and pinion, C clip axleshafts and of course isn't a full floater axle. It also has a smaller "pig". Also available with 6 lug axleshafts in the "heavy half" 1/2t's. More on the 14B: http://www.pirate4x4.com/tech/billav...ble/index.html Last edited by FormerMember; 11-29-2005 at 09:35 AM. |
11-29-2005, 05:54 PM | #13 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Carver County, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 626
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
Quote:
__________________
72 Chev C-10 90% restored (former AZ truck) ... 71 Chev K-20 Cheyenne my vacation crusier... 72 Chev C-10 Now retired and striped after many faithful miles... 72 GMC 1500 Retired to the junk yard after bought new in '71... |
|
11-30-2005, 01:12 PM | #14 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
Quote:
combat tough? commercial tough? I am still curious how the D44 in these trucks is HD. 8 lug nuts? larger outer wheel bearing? or is it the smaller u joint than newer D44 and 10 bolt axles?
__________________
1969 GMC K2500 1996 Honda Accord 2007 Kawasaki KLR 650 |
|
11-30-2005, 11:06 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Grain Valley MO
Posts: 29
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
Ok, how did you convert your eaton to rear disc for 175 bucks? I have a shot wheel cyl and master and am getting ready for a brake job. If I could convert it over as cheap as fixing whats there, I would definitely go that route! Todd
|
12-01-2005, 04:36 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE
Posts: 363
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
The brackets are $60 on Ebay,the rotors were like $60 for the pair,and the calipers were around $55.I may have $190 in it but it was a very good investment.When I step down on it hard I can slide all 4 tires.Oh I forgot break lines,I already had them.
__________________
01 2500 Duramax,6spd,4x4,Not stock. Estimated 550rwhp/1100rwfp on fuel only. 03 3500 Duramax,6spd,4x4,Pac-Brake,not stock Estimated 500rwhp/1000rwfp fuel only 67 K10 in many pieces Little Brothers truck 67 K20 Cummins 12V/NV4500/205, D60/Eaton w/ Detroit,37" Xterrains,crossover steering, Future plans,Twins and lots of fuel. |
11-29-2005, 07:13 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Beeville, Texas
Posts: 1,943
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
There isn't much difference between the 52 and 72, except the 72's brake shoes are taller and wider. I think the 52's are 11 5/32" by 2 1/2", and the 72's are 12" by 2 3/4".
__________________
RJD 1984 Chevrolet C30 welding truck 454/SM465 1977 GMC C15 pickup 350/TH350 1970 Chevrolet C20 pickup 350/TH400 1970 Chevrolet K20 Suburban 454/TH350 1969 GMC 8500 478M V6/5 spd winch truck |
12-01-2005, 06:06 PM | #18 | |
Fabricate till you "puke"
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
Quote:
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears.... |
|
12-01-2005, 10:23 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Grain Valley MO
Posts: 29
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
what are you doing for a park brake? I am assuming that for 60 bucks, these calipers do not have a park brake built in. Are you using late 70's front calipers? Can you hook me up with a link on which brackets you bought? Thanks..
|
12-02-2005, 11:59 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Grain Valley MO
Posts: 29
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
ttt
|
12-03-2005, 09:10 AM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Just outside Durham, NC
Posts: 894
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
if you search ebay for 14 bolt, plent of ads will pop up for the mounting brackets he is talking about....$60 seems to be the going rate....pirate4x4.com might have some cheaper brackets.
As for a parking brake, I don't know what he did, but I know jegs and summit both sell a driveshaft parking brake that I was planning on using, its primarily for cars with late model disc brakes in the rear, hope that helps.
__________________
1969 SS 350 Camaro Sold 2008 1970 3/4T K20, stock height with 33's, 250 I6, 3 on the tree, and locked front and rear 4.10's 1980 Chevy Malibu 2 dr Sold 2007 1993 Olds. Cutlass Ciera Wagon Traded 2006 2003 Saturn L200 w/5pd. D/D My list spans 5 decades with One common thread.....GM! |
12-03-2005, 10:30 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE
Posts: 363
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
I used brackets from Greatlakes Offroad.He is on Ebay as well as
Pirate4x4.com.You can get 77'78' Elderado calipers that have e-brake setup.I'm just going to use a line lock with a toggle switch.He only takes M.O.'s don't even ask about Paypal it just pisses him off.
__________________
01 2500 Duramax,6spd,4x4,Not stock. Estimated 550rwhp/1100rwfp on fuel only. 03 3500 Duramax,6spd,4x4,Pac-Brake,not stock Estimated 500rwhp/1000rwfp fuel only 67 K10 in many pieces Little Brothers truck 67 K20 Cummins 12V/NV4500/205, D60/Eaton w/ Detroit,37" Xterrains,crossover steering, Future plans,Twins and lots of fuel. |
12-03-2005, 08:43 PM | #23 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,411
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
For rear disk brakes with an emergency brake built in to the caliper, use 76-78 Eldorado Rear calipers. The only problem is that all of the rebuilt units out there will not come with the 'actuating' lever and springs. The calipers are not functional without these parts. There are some 'off road' companies out there that will sell you the calipers with their own version of the levers and springs, but be prepared to spend almost $400.00 for the pair.
I do have a pair of 76-78 Eldorado calipers complete with the levers and springs that I'm not using for sale if interested. Thanks, 72longbed BTW, did my homework on this, and YES you can use the same disk brake brackets on an HO52/72 as a 14 Bolt Full Floater. Same rotors and calipers too. Last edited by 72longbed; 12-03-2005 at 08:45 PM. |
12-03-2005, 11:36 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Grain Valley MO
Posts: 29
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
Ok, I am going to sound like a broken record, but what master and proportioning valve did you use?
|
12-04-2005, 12:32 AM | #25 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,411
|
Re: eaton vs. corp 14
I don't know if you are asking me or somebody else, but I used the stock factory M.C. and Prop. valve with no problems.
72longbed |
Bookmarks |
|
|