The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2012, 06:49 PM   #1
406 Q-ship
Registered User
 
406 Q-ship's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 632
Did anyone see this

Did anyone watch Trucks TV this weekend and see the 71 Cheyenne SWB fleet they picked up. Looks like a pretty nice truck. They say it was a BB truck that has a 1970 Corvette 454 in it, probably a LS-5, Which of course came from a Corvette....not anyone of the thousands that were installed in Impalas, Caprices, and or Monte Carlo/Chevelle SS454, because everyone knows if it the same as the general engine but came in a Corvette it is better
__________________
Lifes journey is not to arrive at the gate well preserved, it is to slide in sideways all used up and wore out yelling.....God what'a ride!

Where patience fails, force prevails

Stapp's Ironical Paradox "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."
406 Q-ship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2012, 06:52 PM   #2
JVictor75
Maintenance Man
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ US
Posts: 213
Re: Did anyone see this

Quote:
Originally Posted by 406 Q-ship View Post
Did anyone watch Trucks TV this weekend and see the 71 Cheyenne SWB fleet they picked up. Looks like a pretty nice truck. They say it was a BB truck that has a 1970 Corvette 454 in it, probably a LS-5, Which of course came from a Corvette....not anyone of the thousands that were installed in Impalas, Caprices, and or Monte Carlo/Chevelle SS454, because everyone knows if it the same as the general engine but came in a Corvette it is better
LOL, I think I'm going to start telling people that mine is an ultra swank top secret Biscayne edition C-10, that's why it has the 396 in it. Just to get the confused looks.
JVictor75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2012, 06:54 PM   #3
70cst
Senior Member
 
70cst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Madison, Ohio
Posts: 21,365
Re: Did anyone see this

I enjoyed the 9MPG stat
__________________
A husband can be right...or...A husband can be happy.

67-72 Chevy and GMC Trucks...The Classic Truck for the Classic Folk.

1970 CST Two tone green, 402BB, 400 Automatic, Tach, Buckets, AC, AM-FM, Tilt, GM CB, GM 8 Tract, LWB, etc

JOHN 17:3...The better side of "LIFE"


Remember: Everyday is a good day...Some are just gooder!
70cst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 12:41 AM   #4
PAWS 72
Registered User
 
PAWS 72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sheffield, ALA
Posts: 2,471
Re: Did anyone see this

Wasn't there a craigslisting for it a week or 2 ago on here? Yea i saw it.

They will ruin it. you watch.
PAWS 72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 11:05 AM   #5
RenoKeene
Florida Edition

 
RenoKeene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fruitland Park, FL
Posts: 4,022
Re: Did anyone see this

It's a factory Big Block shortbed Cheyenne.....and they are putting a small block in it. That's TV for ya.
__________________
70 GMC Short Stepside "Rose"-An American Beauty: Factory 402/TH400, AM/FM, AC, Tilt, Tach, Buckets, Posi, PS, PB, 3-5 Drop, Complete Resto-Rod
67 C-20 Slant Back Wrecker "Mad Max"
67 C-10 Ratrod "Step-N-Wolf"
71 Serro Scotty Sportsman camper "Scotty"
97 LT1 Z28 "The Hornet"

Link to more pics of "Rose" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a...p?albumid=1684

Check out my "Cheap Tricks" thread and add to it if you can, lots of good info there. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=489394
RenoKeene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 12:59 PM   #6
no moa
Registered User
 
no moa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: maine
Posts: 2,315
Re: Did anyone see this

Quote:
Originally Posted by RenoKeene View Post
It's a factory Big Block shortbed Cheyenne.....and they are putting a small block in it. That's TV for ya.
I was thinking that also. WTH.
__________________
1972 C10 Deluxe.Shortbed. 402/400. A/C, white interior, needs complete restore. Project Red, white and blue. Used to be a Longbed apperently.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=451950

1971 c10 step 250 3 OTT

1969 c30 TOW-MATER. 307 4 speed, holmes 440 body.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=451082

2006 CTS-V LS2 6spd.
no moa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 01:45 PM   #7
E.Furgal
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Abington,Ma.
Posts: 87
Re: Did anyone see this

Quote:
Originally Posted by RenoKeene View Post
It's a factory Big Block shortbed Cheyenne.....and they are putting a small block in it. That's TV for ya.
might be because the ls engine will make more useable power and better mpg and pull more than the bbc with 3 speed could even dream of.
E.Furgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 11:33 AM   #8
leddzepp
Moderator
 
leddzepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 19,996
Re: Did anyone see this

Half of our trucks I see advertised for sale have a Corvette engine in them.
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed.

1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck.


RIP ElJay
RIP 67ChevyRedneck
RIP Grumpy Old Man
leddzepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 11:36 AM   #9
specialtyretail
So,, what else you got???
 
specialtyretail's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jackson, Mo
Posts: 18,637
Re: Did anyone see this

We don't watch those shows. All they do is throw money at whatever the project is. When there is no budget constraints, no lack of parts sources and all the equipment/skills required any of us could do what they do,, only the finished product would be more realistic if we did it.
specialtyretail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 01:43 PM   #10
E.Furgal
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Abington,Ma.
Posts: 87
Re: Did anyone see this

Quote:
Originally Posted by specialtyretail View Post
We don't watch those shows. All they do is throw money at whatever the project is. When there is no budget constraints, no lack of parts sources and all the equipment/skills required any of us could do what they do,, only the finished product would be more realistic if we did it.
think you should watch musclecar and their olds hurst clone build..
they show you the easy way(store bought) and the make it yourself way..
the rear bumper and spoiler are sick
E.Furgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 02:25 PM   #11
PanelDeland
I am a Referee of life.
 
PanelDeland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro N.C.
Posts: 13,993
Re: Did anyone see this

It's not about the vehicles guys.It's about selling parts.You can't sell crate engines if you keep the big block.They will use a TCI or other aftermarket tranny that would cost any of us $1500 and put some bu++ ugly 24 in rims that run a couple grand a set,then paint it and buy a complete LMC interior kit and all aftermarket chrome for it.All to sell parts.I hate to see a rare BB truck done that way also,but that's what they will do.They are shills for parts companies not true car/truck guys.Besides that,"What's a budget",when the advertisers are giving you all the parts free just to showcase them.
__________________
The 47-present Chevrolet and GMC Truck Message Board Network,it's owners,moderators,members,and associates of any type should not be held responsible for my opinion.
You can't fix stupid,not even with duct tape.
"My appearance is due to the fact that "GOD" does punish you for having too much fun!"
Barrett-Jackson has perfected alchemy,they make rust into gold!
"You can lead a horse to water but you can't saddle a duck"
"Cleverly disguised as a 'Responsible Adult'
"Sometimes your Knight in shining armor is just a retard in tinfoil"
PanelDeland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 03:27 PM   #12
JVictor75
Maintenance Man
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ US
Posts: 213
Re: Did anyone see this

Quote:
Originally Posted by PanelDeland View Post
It's not about the vehicles guys.It's about selling parts.You can't sell crate engines if you keep the big block.They will use a TCI or other aftermarket tranny that would cost any of us $1500 and put some bu++ ugly 24 in rims that run a couple grand a set,then paint it and buy a complete LMC interior kit and all aftermarket chrome for it.All to sell parts.I hate to see a rare BB truck done that way also,but that's what they will do.They are shills for parts companies not true car/truck guys.Besides that,"What's a budget",when the advertisers are giving you all the parts free just to showcase them.
Agreed on all points. And not to mention that they most likely won't even speak to Nate Porter or Rob MacGregor before just ordering something from Hotchkis or Ridetech. Not to say that Nate or Rob's stuff would be any less expensive in the long run, but a suspension system from either "house" would be a hell of a lot more competitive and desirable for any of us to have in the end.

And I'll bet that they won't go with the $1500 TCI transmission, oh no. It'll be the 6 speed auto, $4K-$6K easy by the time you're done ordering all the stuff you'll need for it. I don't think they would get the paddle shifters to go with it, but I could be wrong.

Couple that with an Edelbrock blower for that nicely prepared LS motor and you'll see 5-600 horsepower easy to go along with MPGs in the mid to high 20s (if not better).

Add to the pile a complete new braking system from either Brembo or Wilwood.

They set it all up in the intro guys!:

"Wow, this old truck sure does sound nice for being as old, slow, heavy, and inefficient as it is. Sure would be nice to make it be able to handle, stop, and go as well as look and sound as nice as it does."

All for the low low price of about $25,000.00 (not counting labor, or the initial cost of the truck of course.)

Heck yeah it would be AWESOME for most of us to be able to do that kind of thing to our projects. But I think that we're all a little jealous of their ability to just throw enough money at the problem(s) to make them go away.

Speaking personally, I'm also a little morbidly curious to see what kind of silliness they're going to pull on such a nice, desirable, rare, well optioned truck.
JVictor75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 03:09 PM   #13
specialtyretail
So,, what else you got???
 
specialtyretail's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jackson, Mo
Posts: 18,637
Re: Did anyone see this

Man,, you said it....
specialtyretail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 03:36 PM   #14
big_al_71
Registered User
 
big_al_71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,375
Re: Did anyone see this

Cant wait to see the finished product...
__________________
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please!!!!!.



Sylvester's build thread >>>http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ht=big+rebuild
big_al_71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 04:43 PM   #15
MAK191
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 335
Re: Did anyone see this

I'm really shocked by all of the negative comments here. Well maybe not. I like it and I don't care how they build it. I was just happy to see them picking a 71.
MAK191 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 04:45 PM   #16
cardreams
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: kingston ont Canada
Posts: 443
Re: Did anyone see this

would love to know then why does my big block get 17 MPG not 9 like they say
cardreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 09:48 PM   #17
CC69Rat
Registered User
 
CC69Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga TN
Posts: 6,208
Re: Did anyone see this

Quote:
Originally Posted by cardreams View Post
would love to know then why does my big block get 17 MPG not 9 like they say
Amen brother ..

I don't understand how I could go and buy a 2013 Silverado today, and drive it home getting ~18mpg with the LS engine and whatever tranny.

Pull the same engine out, and put some performance mods, cam, headers, and 800 more horses out of the LS, and now it gets 25mpg ?

I'm not trying to start a pissin match here, but I'm thinking maybe some of the younger folks need to drive a built big block before they comment on the magical LS setups? I saw and heard the comments too .. (quoting the dark haired guy on HP) ' We are going to remove this Big Block and hopefully sell it for as much money as possible to get as much or maybe more power with a later model setup.

If LS engines 'pull harder than any Big Block ever dreamed of' .. Why do you see them on Pass Time? 468 / 600+ Cubic inch big blocks in 95% of the cars. An occasional LS ? It's about the tourqe fellas. Seat of the pants power. Now I give credit where the credit is due (LS engines are brutal too) .. But dont under estimate the big cube motors. Carb to carb, Turbo to Turbo .. call it what you will. Power is power and it takes gas to make it.

Bottom line I had my 396 (now 408 ci) left over from a 69 Camaro build. IF it kills me on gas I'll consider the LS package, absolutely. I understand fuel injection, I understand gearing, transmissions, stall speed, cams, .. I get it.

What I dont understand is how a 2005 Silverado for example is rated at 14/18mpg. If I pulled that same engine out and made it what I wanted it to be, I don't think it would still get 18mpg. (I'm using the Silverado for weight factor too) Yep, it's rated at 16/26 mpg for the Corvette BUT the ZO6 for example would weigh a lot less than the C10 / Silverado.

I hope I didn't chap anyone, It was not my intentions. My point is I agree, it's kinda goofy to me to just fill all the big blocks with concrete and sink them to the bottom of the ocean just because the LS setup gives us 5mpg. more (?) I'll stop now. Please, convince me I'm wrong if you choose to do so. .. and what, the $4k it takes to get me to a built LS with computer and the other stuff I need? I have two trucks. My big block is stayin, but I could put the LS in my GMC. .. (??) I'm asking.
__________________
Chad

1967 C10 SWB - Project Savannah - 6.0/4L80 *Currently underway*
1968 C10 SWB - TOTY 2018, 50th Anniversary Tribute Project * Sold * Pride and Joy
1986 Silverado Short Fleet - Scarlet *Sold*
1985 Silverado Short Fleet *Sold*
2022 Jeep Gladiator Mojave
2001 Jeep Cherokee XJ 4x4 - Lifted, Built
1992 Jeep Cherokee XJ 4x4 - Lifted
2013 Honda Accord EX-L v6 Coupe 6spd (wife's ride)
CC69Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 10:51 AM   #18
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: Did anyone see this

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC69Rat View Post
..... I understand fuel injection, I understand gearing, transmissions, stall speed, cams, .. I get it.
My big block is stayin, but I could put the LS in my GMC. .. (??) I'm asking.
Since your asking, let me offer some insight. Yeah I know this is off topic, but here goes. The biggest advantage an LS motor has over a BBC is computer controlled fuel injection and timing.

Think back how hard it once was to make a truly streetable 500hp motor. It requires a lot of head work combined with a big cam all fed by a large carb that consumes massive quantities of very high octane fuel. Usually the fuel is not pump gas.

Try that same formula with an LS based motor and its cake. Building a 500 hp LS that runs on pump gas and can do it all day long with the a/c on is common as dirt. Its virtually impossible to replicate the same HP/TQ numbers on a streetable carbed motor. (Dead horse beating begins now)

As far as the MPG claims go, I still need to see that before I believe it. I don't understand how they are getting 25 mpg on an LS motor when GM cant do it.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 10:58 AM   #19
Beersnob
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Xenia, OH
Posts: 65
Re: Did anyone see this

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX View Post
Since your asking, let me offer some insight. Yeah I know this is off topic, but here goes. The biggest advantage an LS motor has over a BBC is computer controlled fuel injection and timing.

Think back how hard it once was to make a truly streetable 500hp motor. It requires a lot of head work combined with a big cam all fed by a large carb that consumes massive quantities of very high octane fuel. Usually the fuel is not pump gas.

Try that same formula with an LS based motor and its cake. Building a 500 hp LS that runs on pump gas and can do it all day long with the a/c on is common as dirt. Its virtually impossible to replicate the same HP/TQ numbers on a streetable carbed motor. (Dead horse beating begins now)

As far as the MPG claims go, I still need to see that before I believe it. I don't understand how they are getting 25 mpg on an LS motor when GM cant do it.
Yeah, but there's something cool about popping the hood and seeing the engine well filled with 454 cubic inches of pure sexiness! Oh, and when it's fired up, you know it's a big block.
Beersnob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 11:43 AM   #20
nate_g_2003
Registered User
 
nate_g_2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Gregory, TX
Posts: 413
Re: Did anyone see this

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX View Post
As far as the MPG claims go, I still need to see that before I believe it. I don't understand how they are getting 25 mpg on an LS motor when GM cant do it.
I think most of that comes from the computer controlled timing and injection, coupled with the fact that most FI systems run a decently high fuel pressure. The injectors can atomize fuel better/more efficently than a carb can. At least that's how I feel. Being 27, comp-controlled FI is what I've grown up with (aside from Dad's 74 pickup, and Mom's 87 Caprice, neither of which we ever tinkered with).
__________________
-Nathan-
1972 GMC K2500 Suburban "The Project"
2013 GMC Sierra 1500 SLT Z71 "The Daily Driver"
2005 Ford F150 Lariat SCrew 2WD "The Daily Driver" SOLD
1995 GMC Sierra C1500 SLE "The Daily Driver"SOLD
2003 Ford Ranger Edge 2DSC 2WD Flareside "The Daily Driver/Project"SOLD
nate_g_2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 04:59 PM   #21
Stoney
Farm Truck
 
Stoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jersey Village, Texas
Posts: 547
Re: Did anyone see this

I think it's been replaced with a 454. Real nice looking truck.
__________________
1969 CST/10
1984 K5 Blazer 4x4
2016 Dodge Ram 2500 4x4

Mike
Jersey Village, Tx
Stoney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 05:05 PM   #22
cardreams
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: kingston ont Canada
Posts: 443
Re: Did anyone see this

oh ya also they say pretty common to have a BIG BLOCK lol really ?????
cardreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 06:00 PM   #23
406 Q-ship
Registered User
 
406 Q-ship's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 632
Re: Did anyone see this

Can we really be sure that it was a 400 truck? If it is, the guys on Trucks TV might not want to build a nose heavy pig that plow the north forty before the tires try to turn in. They seem to be heading in a direction of handling over drag racer on this build (that may change it has in the past) I understand not liking when a factory rare vehicle gets torn up for the sake of media, I still cringe when that dumba** Jesse James F-ed up a real SS454 El Camino to build a street stock.

I hear what some are saying about they will just have parts given to them from the manufactures that are (in whole) beyond the means of the average enthusist. Tell me have you never read a magazine or seen one of TV shows that showed a particular modification and went to and/or installed it on your own vehicle....remember you DON'T have to build them EXACTLY like they do in the media. The whole idea for media builds is not like a bunch of buddies hanging out comparing their builds, it is to get coverage for parts suppliers. Do you whine when movies show people living in NY on a beer budget and they have a 4k Flat screen on the wall? You do get it is called advertizing?
__________________
Lifes journey is not to arrive at the gate well preserved, it is to slide in sideways all used up and wore out yelling.....God what'a ride!

Where patience fails, force prevails

Stapp's Ironical Paradox "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."
406 Q-ship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 09:56 PM   #24
CC69Rat
Registered User
 
CC69Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga TN
Posts: 6,208
Re: Did anyone see this

Quote:
Originally Posted by 406 Q-ship View Post
..the guys on Trucks TV might not want to build a nose heavy pig that plow the north forty before the tires try to turn in.
Ok, .. Nm. I'm out guys. Later. Where's that unsubscribe button again ?

Good luck to all.
__________________
Chad

1967 C10 SWB - Project Savannah - 6.0/4L80 *Currently underway*
1968 C10 SWB - TOTY 2018, 50th Anniversary Tribute Project * Sold * Pride and Joy
1986 Silverado Short Fleet - Scarlet *Sold*
1985 Silverado Short Fleet *Sold*
2022 Jeep Gladiator Mojave
2001 Jeep Cherokee XJ 4x4 - Lifted, Built
1992 Jeep Cherokee XJ 4x4 - Lifted
2013 Honda Accord EX-L v6 Coupe 6spd (wife's ride)
CC69Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2012, 10:06 PM   #25
1972BackInBlackC10
Senior Member
 
1972BackInBlackC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Estevan, Saskatchewan
Posts: 1,025
Re: Did anyone see this

i think the reason why you dont see ls motors more yet is because they re still relatively new, and also parts are not cheap for them either as we all know,
1972BackInBlackC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com