The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1969 - 1972 Blazers and Jimmys Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2008, 09:51 PM   #1
Bentblazer
Registered User
 
Bentblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rolla Mo.
Posts: 667
Another Stupid PO

While removing several pounds of filler on pass side I discovered a patch over the wheel arch. The patch did not have the small crease around the edge of the opening. They used that patch and filled the original crease with filler to make it look the same. My question is where or what would that patch be from? Going to try to borrow a pic from AJs72K5 from last Stupid PO. The crease is the small indent around wheel opening.

Last edited by Bentblazer; 11-30-2008 at 09:06 PM.
Bentblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 09:58 PM   #2
Bentblazer
Registered User
 
Bentblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rolla Mo.
Posts: 667
Re: Another Stupid PO

Sorry AJ hope this isn't a copy right infringement, with pic if so come get Blazer you would save me lots of $
Bentblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 10:12 PM   #3
AJs72K5
Registered User
 
AJs72K5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Tx
Posts: 1,083
Re: Another Stupid PO

No worries. I opened the thread and was like, "Hey! That's me!"
__________________
- AJ

Gray Matter Build - 1972 K5 with some stuff
AJs72K5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 07:27 AM   #4
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: Another Stupid PO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bentblazer View Post
While removing several pounds of filler on pass side I discovered a patch over the wheel arch. The patch did not have the small crease around the edge of the opening. They used that patch and filled the original crease with filler to make it look the same. My question is where or what would that patch be from? Going to try to borrow a pic from AJs72K5 from last Stupid PO. The crease is the small indent around wheel opening.
Are you talking about the lower rear wheel arch?

This part maybe?
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 07:39 AM   #5
Bentblazer
Registered User
 
Bentblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rolla Mo.
Posts: 667
Re: Another Stupid PO

Yes, There is a small crease all along the edge of the opening just before turning into the inner wheel house on the rear and before the inner fender on front. The patch didn't have that small profile like the original. Wondering where it came from.
Bentblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 08:12 AM   #6
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: Another Stupid PO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bentblazer View Post
Yes, There is a small crease all along the edge of the opening just before turning into the inner wheel house on the rear and before the inner fender on front. The patch didn't have that small profile like the original. Wondering where it came from.
Those are present only on stock/factory fenders, no repro part maker has ever managed to design them into their parts.

(if I'm understanding you correctly that is)
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 05:41 PM   #7
Bentblazer
Registered User
 
Bentblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rolla Mo.
Posts: 667
Re: Another Stupid PO

Hope this will clear up what I am trying to explain, the profile on the original is circled in red. Hard to tell with pics but looking close you might be able to tell where patch starts without profile. The original (darker shade) is about where the splash guard is, above and below that is the patch without profile.
__________________
"85" Monte Carlo SS
"71" K5 (SOLD)
"64" Chevelle
1930 Chevy two door rat

Last edited by Bentblazer; 03-08-2011 at 09:30 AM.
Bentblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 07:07 PM   #8
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: Another Stupid PO

Yep, nothing reproduced like that.

Put a WTB thread up in the classified section looking for a patch area from an "original" fender and you'll find yourself one.

Gotta be a subscribed member though...
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 11:05 PM   #9
69-72
Registered User
 
69-72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 204
Posts: 903
Re: Another Stupid PO

Quote:
Originally Posted by vtblazer View Post
Those are present only on stock/factory fenders, no repro part maker has ever managed to design them into their parts.

(if I'm understanding you correctly that is)

Actually no, some patch panels do come with the detailed lip, only the really cheap stuff doesn't have it.
69-72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 07:15 AM   #10
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: Another Stupid PO

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69-72 View Post
Actually no, some patch panels do come with the detailed lip, only the really cheap stuff doesn't have it.
Who's has it?
Which repro manufacture does the indent?

No pics, no proof.
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 10:51 PM   #11
AJs72K5
Registered User
 
AJs72K5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Tx
Posts: 1,083
Re: Another Stupid PO

That's really weird. Because my PO told me both front fenders had been replaced when he was making it over due to rust. I assumed aftermarket (LMC) but could be wrong.
__________________
- AJ

Gray Matter Build - 1972 K5 with some stuff

Last edited by AJs72K5; 08-20-2008 at 10:51 PM.
AJs72K5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 07:18 AM   #12
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: Another Stupid PO

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJs72K5 View Post
That's really weird. Because my PO told me both front fenders had been replaced when he was making it over due to rust. I assumed aftermarket (LMC) but could be wrong.
So yours has the indent detail?

I'm smellin' a learning curve here...
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 07:47 AM   #13
Bentblazer
Registered User
 
Bentblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rolla Mo.
Posts: 667
Re: Another Stupid PO

Early this spring I bought a swb bed side (drivers) that I cut to replace original and it had that indent on it. I got it from Manes. Does a LWB wheel arch measure the same? I have a LWB bedside that I could cut for patch if needed, but wanted to check for new first. Would hate to have to fill indent on new side If I could repair original since forth fronts and driver look same.
__________________
"85" Monte Carlo SS
"71" K5 (SOLD)
"64" Chevelle
1930 Chevy two door rat
Bentblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 09:08 AM   #14
69-72
Registered User
 
69-72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 204
Posts: 903
Re: Another Stupid PO

They make a patch for the rear wheel arch with the indent in it. And yes the LWB arch would be the same.

MOST Tri-plus panels have the detail but you may get a bad one, depends who you buy from it seems. Another brand I came across with it was Tabco.

Anyone that wants picture proof of the detail on the rear arch I will PM the pics.


Oh yah and I have GMC repro front fenders that have the indents also.

Last edited by 69-72; 08-21-2008 at 09:12 AM.
69-72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 10:01 PM   #15
Bentblazer
Registered User
 
Bentblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rolla Mo.
Posts: 667
Re: Another Stupid PO

So do you think it would be better to cut a patch out of the LWB or look for a repop patch?
__________________
"85" Monte Carlo SS
"71" K5 (SOLD)
"64" Chevelle
1930 Chevy two door rat
Bentblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 10:23 PM   #16
msgross
Registered User
 
msgross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central PA
Posts: 12,201
Re: Another Stupid PO

isn't the rear arch of a SWB and LWB different? I thought that the SWB "swept" out more in the rear of the arch. Not sure what your blazers do but be sure to check...
__________________
The Garage:
1968 K-10 SWB - "Project Money Pit"
1996 Z-71 - "huntin rig"
1969 C-10 LWB (SOLD) "Project flip that truck or else"
1993 Passport, F@rd 1-ton (SOLD)"Project Cousin Eddie"


My Garage Build "The 1,000 footer"
msgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2008, 08:56 AM   #17
69-72
Registered User
 
69-72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 204
Posts: 903
Re: Another Stupid PO

Orignal metal is always better IF you can find it, but when I was matching up the creases from the repop panel to the orginal it was pretty darn close. The rear arches on LWB, SWB and Blazers are all the same.
69-72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2008, 11:50 PM   #18
abebummy26
Registered User
 
abebummy26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Haven, MO
Posts: 1,243
Re: Another Stupid PO

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69-72 View Post
Orignal metal is always better IF you can find it, but when I was matching up the creases from the repop panel to the orginal it was pretty darn close. The rear arches on LWB, SWB and Blazers are all the same.
Uh I have to disagree with you on that one check out the 3rd post down on this page. http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...223158&page=41
__________________
-Lincoln

1987 GMC S15 (soon to be a chevy clone)
2.5l, 4 speed, no ps, no pb, no ac

Silence is golden, but duct tape is silver.

Spoken by Cletus the hillbilly
I like stickers... a whole bunch.
abebummy26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 08:57 AM   #19
Bentblazer
Registered User
 
Bentblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rolla Mo.
Posts: 667
Re: Another Stupid PO

I can see the difference in the photos, the patch I need will run from near the moulding on the front around to the rear to the bottom, Think that would work?
__________________
"85" Monte Carlo SS
"71" K5 (SOLD)
"64" Chevelle
1930 Chevy two door rat
Bentblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 11:41 AM   #20
69-72
Registered User
 
69-72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 204
Posts: 903
Re: Another Stupid PO

Quote:
Originally Posted by abebummy26 View Post
Uh I have to disagree with you on that one check out the 3rd post down on this page. http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...223158&page=41


I am referring to the upper piece, the actual arch area.


Last edited by 69-72; 08-24-2008 at 11:42 AM.
69-72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 03:04 PM   #21
Bentblazer
Registered User
 
Bentblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rolla Mo.
Posts: 667
Re: Another Stupid PO

The pic you have shown is what I have to replace, but would like to continue on to the rear bottom as a small patch wa placed there also. The idea was to replace two patches with one. It does look like that the forward bottom looks different however I don't need to go that far down,
__________________
"85" Monte Carlo SS
"71" K5 (SOLD)
"64" Chevelle
1930 Chevy two door rat
Bentblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 10:28 PM   #22
Rokcrln
Senior Member
 
Rokcrln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winters Ca. 95694
Posts: 4,843
Re: Another Stupid PO

Yes from the front belt line molding up around to the rear arch bottom they are all the same. The differance is in the lower front corner of a LWB to a SWB/Blazer. So it should work fine depending on your skills.

Kevin
LFD Inc.
Rokcrln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 10:56 PM   #23
Old Chevy Mech
Keepin it runnin!
 
Old Chevy Mech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Deep River, CT
Posts: 1,036
Re: Another Stupid PO

Tabco's panels (the ones THEY make) have that detail perfectly. I ordered the patch panel for the area forward of the wheel well on the rear qtr panel and it came with the detail (very crisp) and a nice heavy galvaniel gage steel! I suggest calling before ordering and specifying that you want their parts only, because they do sell some inferior parts too. I'll try to get some pics....

Frank
__________________
1970 K-5 4X4 Blazer
1970 K-20 4X4 Long Bed

"Liberty Means Responsibility, that is why most men dread it"
Old Chevy Mech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 09:01 PM   #24
Bentblazer
Registered User
 
Bentblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rolla Mo.
Posts: 667
Re: Another Stupid PO

Located a patch panel with indent from a board vendor last week. On vacation this week and due to Gustav remnants I was confined to the spousal avoidance center and try my luck at installing. I'm not much of a welder so those who are my hat is off to ya. The small patch with green was off of a donor lwb bed, the black patch was the repop. The last is next to replace just had to show how much filler was used, nearly a half inch thick. Feel free to give advise it is appreciated. On a lighter note I took picture of a lake that I had dug in July, yesterday this lake had only a foot of water in it and thanks to Gustav twelve hrs later and 6.5" of rain its more than full.
Attached Images
 
__________________
"85" Monte Carlo SS
"71" K5 (SOLD)
"64" Chevelle
1930 Chevy two door rat

Last edited by Bentblazer; 03-08-2011 at 09:30 AM.
Bentblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008, 09:58 AM   #25
raggedjim
Senior Member
 
raggedjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Posts: 3,463
Re: Another Stupid PO

Looks good. How are things in Rolla since B&S left? I hated that, a lot of good guys worked there...

Rg
__________________
Roger

'68 Short step - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=849675
'69 ('70?) 2wd Blazer
'70 GMC Jimmy 2wd
'73 Firebird - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=853203
raggedjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com