Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
05-29-2004, 03:22 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Williamsfield, IL
Posts: 781
|
air bags under a 67-72 burb?
Anybody have pics and details of their bagged burb? How much did it cost you, are you running a 4-link, etc.?
__________________
Ben 84 C10 Silverado 14 Silverado Z71 |
05-29-2004, 09:05 AM | #2 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sallis,MS
Posts: 479
|
I replied in the other thread with some pics. I just bagged mine on the factory 2-link just boxed it and put a loner adjustible panhard bar on. Mounted the bags further forward than were the springs mount for more lift.
|
05-29-2004, 12:54 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Williamsfield, IL
Posts: 781
|
What kind of rear suspension do 67-72 burbs have from the factory? Can you put bags under it w/out any serious mods(like customizing cross members)?
__________________
Ben 84 C10 Silverado 14 Silverado Z71 |
05-29-2004, 02:56 PM | #4 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sallis,MS
Posts: 479
|
rear suspension
Suburbans have a factory 2-link w/ a panhard bar. Airride Tecnologies makes a complete bolt-in airride setup w/ bolt-in notch for these trucks. It lays them down preety low within about 5 inches from the ground.
|
05-31-2004, 07:55 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 83
|
There are many options available. You need to decide how low your trying to go first. There are allot of aftermarket parts availabe but you still will need to modify somethings on your vehicle. My 71 Suburban is currently being dropped to the rockers on 22's. The frame work and suspension has been very extensive. Everything is being custom fabricated. The most most extensive work on these models tends to be steering. I've purchased tubular uppers and lowers to help. The frame and horns are being Z'd approx. 2 1/2 inches and the front cross meber is being raised another 1 1/2 inches. All in all the front will be dropped around 10" andwill keep correct camber. The rear is utilizing a 96 Impala SS disc rear and a custom 2 link. The tires actullay rest about 2" below the rear gless and the front should be about 1/4" from the underneth of the hood. Good luck. Let me know if I can help.
|
05-31-2004, 09:48 PM | #6 |
drag body or die
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Redneck country
Posts: 79
|
Please dont bag on the stock 2 link. Yes, shops do it, feature trucks have it, but bags on 2 links are even more notorious for buckling the bars, especially 30+ yr old bars. Get a 4 link or buy ART's airbar for the truck. I'd say 4 link it, notch the frame and sit the suck flat on the ground.
__________________
-Bobby- |
06-01-2004, 01:58 AM | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
__________________
Mike Lackey '68 C10 |
|
06-03-2004, 08:41 PM | #8 | |
drag body or die
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Redneck country
Posts: 79
|
Quote:
Yes, you boxed them.. okay? Extensives 2x2x3/16" 2link setup has buckled before. I;'ve been in an s10 and we airred up to clear a bump coming, hit the bump in a 45 and it bent one of the bars, b/c with so much the bar doesnt have as much give as say a spring on it would.
__________________
-Bobby- |
|
06-03-2004, 08:58 PM | #9 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sallis,MS
Posts: 479
|
Kutthroat
I am sure if you mounted the bag at the pivot point(cantilever) it would put a whole lot of stress on the bars and maybe buckle them(but probally not). How is a 4-link with the bags mounted o bars any better??????
|
06-03-2004, 10:48 PM | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,031
|
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. Last edited by SCOTI; 06-03-2004 at 11:01 PM. |
|
06-04-2004, 02:15 PM | #11 | |
Progress = 0%
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
|
Quote:
Actually, I'd think an bag would be easier on the trailing arm because of the greater surface area (bag plate/bracker) it comes in contact with as opposed to the end of a coil spring.
__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra |
|
06-05-2004, 12:24 PM | #12 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
__________________
Mike Lackey '68 C10 |
|
06-07-2004, 12:05 AM | #13 |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
When the truck is sitting still (assuming that you are not pushing against an upper travel limiter) there would be no difference. The weight of the truck is the same, so the incerased air pressure just makes the bag taller, thus raising the truck. It is when the truck is moving(or loaded) that the increased pressure would act as increased spring-rate too.
A bump that would force the axle to be deflected upward with a lower air pressure would apply that force to the entire weight of the truck if the bag had greater pressure. The force involved is dependant upon the placement of the bag. The closer the bag is to the pivot point, more force is applied to the trailing arms. As the bag is moved closer to the rear axle itself there is less force applied to the trailing arms, but you get less lift. |
05-31-2004, 10:14 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Williamsfield, IL
Posts: 781
|
Don't you have to cut a hole in the floor to lay frame though? And do you have to raise the crossmembers as well?
__________________
Ben 84 C10 Silverado 14 Silverado Z71 Last edited by benscool1; 05-31-2004 at 10:17 PM. |
05-31-2004, 11:53 PM | #15 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sallis,MS
Posts: 479
|
KUTThroat
Depends on how much money he wants to spend, I boxed my stock bars and bagged it on them. Guess what no buckling, noone told him to just bag on the bars I said you have to box them. I did mine this way to get by a while before I 4-link it and it works. And I did supernotch it but just doing that won't lay these trucks flat. You've also got to raise crossmembers and either z the frame, raise crossmember, or just bag it and bodydrop. I raised my crossmember 1.5", rebuilt tranny and swing bearing crossmembers, and it still likes 1/2 inch laying pinchwelds flat. So i suggest z-ing the frame to lay all the way out. I'm going back and z-ing mine 2" and am cutting off part of the rockers. Not trying to discourage use of 4-link just giving him lower dollar approach. LATER
|
06-01-2004, 01:43 AM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Williamsfield, IL
Posts: 781
|
Thanks ghetto, lower dollar definitely is the approach I need but while not sacrificing quality. I think boxing in the bars will be what I do. What kind of drop can I do in the back before I have to notch? And if I notch the frame will I have to cut into the floor immediately or do I only cut in the floor if I do an extreme drop? I plan to only do a static drop immediately, maybe 4in coils in the back w/1.5in blocks and 3in coils in the front w/2.5in spindles or does that not sound right? Would I be able to do that w/only a c-notch and not cutting the floor?
__________________
Ben 84 C10 Silverado 14 Silverado Z71 |
06-01-2004, 03:10 AM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Williamsfield, IL
Posts: 781
|
BTW, what does it mean to Z the frame?
__________________
Ben 84 C10 Silverado 14 Silverado Z71 |
06-02-2004, 10:22 AM | #18 | |
Progress = 0%
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
|
Quote:
__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra |
|
06-02-2004, 10:39 AM | #19 |
Mike
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: west chester pa
Posts: 2,474
|
I would tend to think You just need to make sure Your trailing arms are in good shape and not rusting.This goes for springs or bags.After all a loaded truck can be pretty heavy,and not have to worry about the arms buckling.How many trucks and burbs that are on air carry any loads?
__________________
70'c/10, 71 suburban4x4 402bb, 72suburban 4/6 drop, 72k/5 4x4 blazer 4" lift 35 tires |
06-02-2004, 03:18 PM | #20 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 1,387
|
Quote:
"z'ing the frame" reffers to an old hot/rat rod method of lowering the front of a car. They would cut the frame before the engine mounts and before the front suspension. And also cut the frame after the engine mount and the front suspension. They would jack that section up a few inches and weld it back inplace. this lowers the car, raises the engine, and acts like a dropped crossmember so now you can do your drop spindles and coils and have a really, really low ride. Check out IF customs website, I believe they did the z'ed frame to a 66 suburban to clear 22" wheels |
|
06-02-2004, 10:55 PM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Williamsfield, IL
Posts: 781
|
The 64 Suburban? Can you do this to the rear suspension/frame as well?
__________________
Ben 84 C10 Silverado 14 Silverado Z71 |
06-03-2004, 04:36 AM | #22 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 1,387
|
Quote:
I am sure you could but I dont think it would be engineered like its supposed to be. The conventional way is to do a stock floor bodydrop if you really want to go that low |
|
06-04-2004, 06:42 PM | #23 |
drag body or die
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Redneck country
Posts: 79
|
The more air in a bag, the more the "spring rate".. so dep[ending the bag in the back, ride height could be stiff or soft. Depending if you show up and raise the back all the way up, etc. The more the air the stiffer the bag.
Ghetto - that isnt a cantilever... a cantilever has a rocker and pivot point. The bag on bars is a Mechanical Advantage Lever set. As for your 4 link question, 4 bars distribute the weight, not just 2. Yes the 2 links of now a days are different then the truck back then. But a 2 link is a 2 link. If it works, use it :shrugs:.. As for the 4 link question. Easy, a lot of the 4 link bars are a) gussetted like on KP's kits or they're thick enough to handle it, like on sd.com's stuff, 2x2 box 1/4" thick. The ppl that dont gusset their bars or run thick stuff like Jason makes at sd.com are looking for problems. I've seen acouple trucks, yet again, another s10, this time a 1 st gen, used a FBI universal 4 link and it bucked the bars. b/c of the downward force. air bags push DOWN, the air enters at the top and it pushes down, which pushes the rear end down and the frame goes up. There are different spring rates, but non are on the fly change, why else do you think Firestone 2500 bags with enough air to say, untuck 18's on a smaller truck is so bouncey/crappy ride? b/c its a stiffer rate b/c there is ~120+psi in them. With the bigger bags, its less air for a certain height = softer rater = better ride. Depending your bags using. Slam Specialties bags are stiffer then most in nature, not ride, but a stiffer bag in general also. If your truck tows with the setup.. cool. But some trucks use 2"x2" frame for stock floors.. but i guess since it hasnt fallin apart, its "right" to do, even tho its deflection is more then stock (i know we're not talking about bd's, but its the point that matters).
__________________
-Bobby- |
06-07-2004, 01:06 PM | #24 | ||
Seņor Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
06-04-2004, 06:58 PM | #25 | |
Progress = 0%
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
|
Quote:
Isn't the truck trailing arm design called a 3-link? Two arms (2) and a panhard bar (1)? It's a very simple well designed suspension. Ever seen a NASCAR chassis? Same thing.
__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra Last edited by Slammed67; 06-05-2004 at 03:56 PM. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|