The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2004, 09:18 PM   #1
smitty62
Registered User
 
smitty62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,234
What's wrong with tuned port?

I see TPI units being sold for what seems to me to be dirt cheap. I've always thought this would be neat on my truck, but now I'm getting a little nervous. Is there something wrong with putting one of these units on my 350? I know I would have to buy a modified/new wiring harness and install an electric fuel pump---what other major expense would I have?
__________________


Stepsides look like real trucks!
Smitty

smitty62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 09:31 PM   #2
lock
Insert funny comment.
 
lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Concord NC
Posts: 621
Nothing at all wrong with a TPI. Awesome setups. Prices probably coming down as more and more thirdgen f-body's bite the dust and get parted. Plus there are other great setups to use now such as the LT1 and LS1. I love the look of a nicely polished TPI. Those long tubes look sweet.
__________________
------------
- Mark

-My Build Thread...

-68 C10, LT1 - Undergoing Frame off resto
-86 IROC-Z T72 turbo 355, M6
-70 Camaro

http://www.iroc-ss.com
lock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 10:10 PM   #3
jorgensensc
Registered User
 
jorgensensc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cypress, Tx
Posts: 4,005
I am also thinking of doing this swap very soon. Hopefully all funds can get put in the appropriate places soon enough for me to do this swap and an overdrive tranny. Don't forget you also need the correct dizzy too. It is often forgotten.
Shawn
__________________
1972 C20 Suburban- Big Blue Betty
'56 Chevy Bel Air Sedan- Frame up Restoration

-What would you attempt to achieve if you knew you could not fail?-

-I Refuse To Tiptoe Through Life, Only To Arrive Safely At Death's Door-

R.I.P. EAST SIDE LOW LIFE
jorgensensc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 10:29 PM   #4
chassispro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Seneca, SC, USA
Posts: 52
Nothing is wrong with tune port. It seems as though now everyone is using the LS1 and LT1 because you can usually find a fairly low mileage running motor, so they just go with that. I actually have a TPI setup I'm going to be installing on the 406 I'm going to put in my truck over the winter. Oh yeah, it's gonna have twin turbo on it as well.
chassispro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 11:35 PM   #5
smitty62
Registered User
 
smitty62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,234
Chassipro---how are you going to get it to hook up?
__________________


Stepsides look like real trucks!
Smitty

smitty62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 11:46 PM   #6
Shane65
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 108
Chassispro, I would really check out the tpi choice for your 406. They can't flow enough air for a larger engine. They were adequate for 305 and 350 stock engines but are very limited to any engine that has modifications that will mean the engine needs more air. Ask around before you go too far.
Shane65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 11:55 PM   #7
neonlarry
Registered User
 
neonlarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 2,746
There are lots of twin turbo tpi cars around. Yes, there are better ways to do it (look at some of the stage 2 turbo buicks)or some of the cars on here http://www.sdsefi.com/project.html Using the tpi manifold should work fine though.
__________________
70 C/10 Light Red 350/TH350, HEI, Duals w/40 series Flows, 91 seat, LED taillights
99 Pontiac S/C GTP, SLP Ram Air hood, GMPP Konis & springs
95 Neon ACR, MP PCM, AFX UDP, 3.0 CAI
neonlarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 12:18 AM   #8
72C203503ONTHETREE
Registered User
 
72C203503ONTHETREE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grant, Alabama
Posts: 504
TPI is fine for low power or for towing since they are designed for low rpm power and throttle response. You can get aftermarket runners that will make more power than the small stock runners. You will also have to have the computer(make sure you get that and for whatever trans you plan on using) reprogrammed if you plan on using a different cam or other air flow mods. Don't bother with the Hypertech Power programmer or similar, get the computer properly set up for your set up. The stock TPI 305 and 350 kind of die out after 4,500 rpm or so, the runners are too long and small to make much top end power. Save up some money and get the Accel, Holley, or other full aftermarket system, it looks like TPI but comes with programmable computer you tune yourself and are set up for power over mileage, even though they do get good mileage.
__________________
72 Chevy C20, SOLD (Dang it.)

09 Challanger RT six speed in all black.

74 Datsun 710 wagon, all 1.8 liters of screaming Datsun power.

73 C10 long bed, 350/350 combo, nice shape.
72C203503ONTHETREE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 12:24 AM   #9
Shane
Account Suspended
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
The only thing I can see wrong with a TPI setup is that I don't have one.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 01:11 AM   #10
Mudder
Registered User
 
Mudder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: East Central, MO
Posts: 11,336
I want one!!!!!!!!
Mudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 07:38 AM   #11
Bowtie67
Registered User
 
Bowtie67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,266
The TPI is really a nice setup, There are guys turning in some good numbers using these systems. There are some drawbacks, the 4500rpm limit was more due to the cam issue than the limitation of the system, the TPI will go to 5200rpm, there are aftermarket baseplates and runners from Edelbrock and a different top peice from Accel to bring these up to higher RPMS. But for a fairly stock to a slightly modified engine setup, daily driver there really isnt much of a better setup than these. They really produce good torque and fuel economy. The reason for seeing the price drop on these is because of the new engines cant use these setups and they made how many of the TPI's over the years. Here is another company that builds a very simular system based on the TPI setup with a little better prformance and a bit better price than buying a whole new system setup from Edelbrock, Accel, and Holley.

http://www.firstinjections.com/products.htm
__________________
1967 C10 - SWBSS Pro Street 427sbc, 700R4 & 4.10 Gears
1948 Chevy FleetMaster Coupe, LS1, (almost done)
1950 Chevy StyleLine Coupe 250/6 3x2 Dueces
2009 Toyota Tundra
1996 Harley RoadKing

"I maybe getting old, but I can still burn rubber with the best of them"
Bowtie67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 07:52 AM   #12
chassispro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Seneca, SC, USA
Posts: 52
Smitty62 : I'm going to use one of the aftermarket DFI (digital fuel injection) units. But if I were going to leave it stock I'd just use a painless wiring harness. You can get a painless harness for around $300 for the TPI setup.

Shane65 : The TPI setup I have is the aftermarket Accell unit. it has been ported and will flow enough air for what I'm gonna use it for. Besides, it's not a race truck, It's just going to be a play toy. The TPI and turbos are really just going on for the "ooh, ahh" factor.
chassispro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 08:07 AM   #13
Shane65
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 108
Here's what I run on my Chevy II for "ooh, aah's".

Shane65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 08:19 AM   #14
chassispro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Seneca, SC, USA
Posts: 52
That's pretty cool. Looks like it has been converted From mechanical fuel injection to EFI. What brand EFI you run on it?
chassispro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 08:26 AM   #15
69 Short Fleet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kelowna B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,086
NeonLarry, WICKED link, thanks for sharing!
69 Short Fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 09:02 AM   #16
Shane65
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 108
I converted everything myself and use an Accel DFI computer and wiring harness. Been running excellent since 1999. This pic is from last year, when I changed the colour of the engine.
Shane65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 12:13 PM   #17
gabet40
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 565
good advise from 72c203tree. i had an accel dfi multipoint system but couldnt find the equipment to tune it cuz it was so outdated. so i purchased a brand new holley commander 950 conversion kit and totally simplified for windows instead of DOS. here the latest pic of mine, still plenty of work tho til i can turn her over. multipoint and tpi systems compute their injection based on all the same sensors, but just have different air flow pattern and point of injection
Attached Images
 
__________________
Current owner of 2016 2500 Silverado Midnight Edition.

Former owner of:
69 1/2 ton, change from long/fleet to short/fleet, shaved door handles, shaved tailgate, 4/6 drop, power windows, 700r4
72 blazer, 350 with Holley Commander 950 DFI, crane energizer cam, 350 tranny, dual sanderson blockhuggers/magnaflow exhaust
gabet40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 12:28 PM   #18
red71cheyenne
Back in the sticks
 
red71cheyenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fordland, MO
Posts: 3,188
I really like the TPI, if nothing else, just for the looks. The throttle response is great, the "ooh, ahh" is great and its a relatively easy conversion. The one thing I don't like about mine, is that I don't get great fuel mileage. On the highway I still only get about 14 and I got that running a holley 600. If I could get upwards of 20, I would be really happy about it. If anyone knows how to improve my fuel mileage, I'd love to hear about it. Jeff.
__________________
1971 Cheyenne C-10 w/700R4 and Tuned Port Injection
1969 K5 Blazer w/Tuned Port
2010 2SS/RS Flaming Orange Camaro
2011 K1500 Suburban
2014 K1500 Pickup
2008 Nissan Altima? The wifes' hoopty
red71cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 01:00 PM   #19
gabet40
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 565
redcheyenne what ECU are u runnin? GM? cuz the aftermarket ones u can program for ur specific application and get a few more miles out of em
__________________
Current owner of 2016 2500 Silverado Midnight Edition.

Former owner of:
69 1/2 ton, change from long/fleet to short/fleet, shaved door handles, shaved tailgate, 4/6 drop, power windows, 700r4
72 blazer, 350 with Holley Commander 950 DFI, crane energizer cam, 350 tranny, dual sanderson blockhuggers/magnaflow exhaust
gabet40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 01:04 PM   #20
red71cheyenne
Back in the sticks
 
red71cheyenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fordland, MO
Posts: 3,188
Mine is a GM ECM, with a custom Prom. Its setup for my engine and the whole deal. I even added a speed sensor, but no luck getting better mileage. I am going to drop down to 19lb injectors soon and see if that does anything.
__________________
1971 Cheyenne C-10 w/700R4 and Tuned Port Injection
1969 K5 Blazer w/Tuned Port
2010 2SS/RS Flaming Orange Camaro
2011 K1500 Suburban
2014 K1500 Pickup
2008 Nissan Altima? The wifes' hoopty
red71cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 01:33 PM   #21
gabet40
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 565
ya that should def cut the milage down but ur also gonna have to reconfigure the ECM again. itll also cut down on ur horsepower but nothin beats gas $$$$ saved
__________________
Current owner of 2016 2500 Silverado Midnight Edition.

Former owner of:
69 1/2 ton, change from long/fleet to short/fleet, shaved door handles, shaved tailgate, 4/6 drop, power windows, 700r4
72 blazer, 350 with Holley Commander 950 DFI, crane energizer cam, 350 tranny, dual sanderson blockhuggers/magnaflow exhaust
gabet40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 02:07 PM   #22
red71cheyenne
Back in the sticks
 
red71cheyenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fordland, MO
Posts: 3,188
Ya, I'll just have the guy burn me a new prom for it. I'm waiting to get the injectors put back in til I get the plenum and runners polished though, so no rush. Jeff.
__________________
1971 Cheyenne C-10 w/700R4 and Tuned Port Injection
1969 K5 Blazer w/Tuned Port
2010 2SS/RS Flaming Orange Camaro
2011 K1500 Suburban
2014 K1500 Pickup
2008 Nissan Altima? The wifes' hoopty
red71cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 02:37 PM   #23
Shane65
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 108
Here's a formula for injector sizing. Also has a chart based on engine horsepower.

http://westers_garage.eidnet.org/tec...info.htm#cat11
Shane65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 02:47 PM   #24
Custom 68
Registered User
 
Custom 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,928
I have just finished my install however it is only on the Chassis right now the body is sitting by it ready for paint before I stick it back together. They do look cool and I hope to get some good power out of it. Mine is a 327.
Dave
__________________
Dave
1968 Custom Chevy with turbo charged 5.3 gen III 4l80e swap
1967-71 GMC 3/4 ton long step 4x4 (not sure what year exactly?)
"A good friend will bail you out of jail...but a true friend will be sitting next to you saying "that was frekin awesome".
"If it doesn't fit force it...If it breaks then it needed to be replaced anyway!"
Custom 68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 03:11 PM   #25
red71cheyenne
Back in the sticks
 
red71cheyenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fordland, MO
Posts: 3,188
Thanks Shane! Custom, where are the pics!! Jeff
__________________
1971 Cheyenne C-10 w/700R4 and Tuned Port Injection
1969 K5 Blazer w/Tuned Port
2010 2SS/RS Flaming Orange Camaro
2011 K1500 Suburban
2014 K1500 Pickup
2008 Nissan Altima? The wifes' hoopty
red71cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com