Dare To Compare, Which To Buy The 59 Or 70 - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

Phelgm · 08-11-2004, 10:52 PM

DARE TO COMPARE, WHICH TO BUY THE 59 OR 70

here are my two options
59 apache, $4995 has a 1956 V8 milage unknown
or
70 SWB C10 350 v8 advertised with 126k miles $3500

Both have 3 on the tree, from the pics it looks like the apache has had more work, but I admit I am not sure if there is bondo under that paint or not. Please give me all your input, how to decide etc.... I will use it as a daily driver for my 6 min commute and some trips to lowes on weekends. Nothing heavy. I like the body style of the apache, but the engine is 14 yrs older
2 pics are attached, much more of both @ http://deanhardt.homeip.net/albums/Truck-Pics

*Slams_58* · 08-11-2004, 10:58 PM

59 59 59 59 59 59

But that's just My opinion!!!! I'm a little Biased!

shuttermutt · 08-11-2004, 10:58 PM

Tough call, but I think I'd go with the Apache.

Maximum Overdrive · 08-11-2004, 10:59 PM

Personally I would go with the 70 because it is a Short wheel base....and the body style is better of course

super72 · 08-11-2004, 11:01 PM

I would go with the 70

**Canadian694x4** · 08-11-2004, 11:07 PM

I personally would go for the '70 it looks solid. The '59 seems to be more bang for the buck but you best look them other real good before you make a decision. If you are going to use this truck as a daily driver you may consider the '70 as it is newer.

I personally couldn't drive a '59 daily even if it was only a 6 minute trip due to the risks of having something happen to it from general daily driving conditions etc. It is the "rarer" beauty of the two. Something to consider I suppose. Both seem like great trucks!

Longhorn Man · 08-11-2004, 11:18 PM

Daily driver?
The 70 hands down. The 59 will be down for a week at a time while you wait for parts to come in.

Phelgm · 08-11-2004, 11:22 PM

Its probably worth mentioning that I have a Honda Accord that I use for my appts ( I travel some from time to time) so when I say Daily driver, I mean by choice not by necessity.

*Slams_58* · 08-11-2004, 11:24 PM

Hey Andy!!!!!!!!! SHHHHHHHHHHH.... you're forgetting the COOOOOOOL factor!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Longhorn Man

Daily driver?
The 70 hands down. The 59 will be down for a week at a time while you wait for parts to come in.

Phelgm · 08-11-2004, 11:31 PM

Yes yes the cool factor weighs heavily on my mind. I am leaning toward the c10 though, it looks like the 1956 265 cu." V-8 with power pack is a bit rare and may make it more difficult if I have to do some repairs.

cochran63 · 08-12-2004, 12:02 AM

I would go with the 59. The 265 will take the same parts as the 350 in the 70 so that really isnt an issue.

Longhorn Man · 08-12-2004, 12:22 AM

cocran, actually, you'd be amazed at how many parts would NOT fit that early small block. Lots of revisions made shortly after that.
I still say 70, not becouse I dislike the 59 (although, the grill does make me think of a checker cab) but the 70 will ride better, easier to work on, fairly modern in suspention and brake department (esp with a simple disc upgrade) new parts are easy to find, used parts are easy to find (wile both are almost non-existent on the 59) and the creature comeforts are either already in the 70, or added real easily. The 59 would end up being more of a custom by the time you would enjoy driving it.
Besides, vacume operated windshield wipers suck.

Oh, it was pretty cool seeing you in chat tonight phelgm.

Your turn Shawna. (slams 68)

*dtlilly* · 08-12-2004, 12:27 AM

I have to vote for the 59, but all the points made about why to go with the 70 are definately valid.

krazy_texan · 08-12-2004, 12:34 AM

i say the 59 because it is more rare than a 70 plus it is a fleetside, now honestly how many of those do you see around, then you could find a 67-72 model for a few hundred bucks and slowly fix it up.

**Palf70Step** · 08-12-2004, 05:31 AM

I'm with Andy, the 70....But like Slam_58, I'm Biased

jlive68 · 08-12-2004, 05:45 AM

I will have to go with the '70 just because it is newer but the decission is your's to make. You might want to go and look at them because what you see might not be what you get.

James

**1970 CST Short Wide** · 08-12-2004, 09:45 AM

Its really a simple decision, Buy them Both

*Slams_58* · 08-12-2004, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1970 CST Short Wide

Its really a simple decision, Buy them Both

There ya go!!! Can't go wrong then!

stickshift_or_walk · 08-12-2004, 10:40 AM

A red '70 C10? Who would even be seen driving a piece of $@#! like that?

Just don't check the parking lot outside.

I sold the '53 for all the reasons above. Cool yes, practical, IMO, no. If you're gonna use the truck, and therefore expect it to be dependable and easily maintained, the '70 is much better equipped for that duty than the '59.

...SSOW

Pilgrim · 08-12-2004, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1970 CST Short Wide

Its really a simple decision, Buy them Both

Both Both Both!!!

dubie · 08-12-2004, 10:42 AM

If it was me, I would buy the 59. You could always swap the engine out after a while to a more common SBC at minimal cost. But havig that rare V8 will only up the value of that truck as the years go on. As much as I love the 67-72 style, the 55-59 is still the nicest Chevy body style produced.

Does the 59 still have the solid front axle or has it been upgraded to an IFS system? If it's solid axle, you wouldn't really want it as a daily driver. It would be like driving a lumber wagon

Phelgm · 08-12-2004, 11:19 AM

Thanks for the heads up on the axle, he mentioned that some upgrades were made to make it more comfortable for daily conditions, i will have to see what those are. thanks again for all the advice and keep it coming, when I tag myself a newbie I dont just mean to this BB.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dubie

Does the 59 still have the solid front axle or has it been upgraded to an IFS system? If it's solid axle, you wouldn't really want it as a daily driver. It would be like driving a lumber wagon

john@thepier · 08-12-2004, 01:42 PM

Hi,
This is John's wife and my idea is that you buy the 70 and give me the # to the person with the 59

*dtlilly* · 08-12-2004, 01:48 PM

Hey John's wife (nameless?

) Welcome to the board to ya! You might as well go ahead and sign up for your own board name, this place is the best message board on the net, and you will end up posting here daily like the rest of us

Phelgm · 08-12-2004, 05:11 PM

hes right about that 3 days old and already addicted here...... work, what work?

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtlilly

Hey John's wife (nameless?

) Welcome to the board to ya! You might as well go ahead and sign up for your own board name, this place is the best message board on the net, and you will end up posting here daily like the rest of us

08-11-2004, 10:52 PM	#1
Phelgm Registered User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Mebane (Central), NC Posts: 26	Dare To Compare, Which To Buy The 59 Or 70 DARE TO COMPARE, WHICH TO BUY THE 59 OR 70 here are my two options 59 apache, $4995 has a 1956 V8 milage unknown or 70 SWB C10 350 v8 advertised with 126k miles $3500 Both have 3 on the tree, from the pics it looks like the apache has had more work, but I admit I am not sure if there is bondo under that paint or not. Please give me all your input, how to decide etc.... I will use it as a daily driver for my 6 min commute and some trips to lowes on weekends. Nothing heavy. I like the body style of the apache, but the engine is 14 yrs older 2 pics are attached, much more of both @ http://deanhardt.homeip.net/albums/Truck-Pics

08-11-2004, 10:58 PM	#3
shuttermutt Don't say "Oops!", Doctor Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 677	Tough call, but I think I'd go with the Apache. __________________ 'Mutt 1968 CST LWB: R.I.P. 1967 Chevelle: TPI 454 beast 1967 C10 SWB: Claimed when Bumpster didn't put it on his list

08-11-2004, 10:59 PM	#4
Maximum Overdrive December 21, 2012 Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: Black Eagle, Montana Posts: 1,633	Personally I would go with the 70 because it is a Short wheel base....and the body style is better of course __________________ *"!Ama Sua, Ama Kjella, Ama Lllulla!"*

08-11-2004, 11:07 PM	#6
Canadian694x4 Born To Lose Club Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Calgary, Alberta/Oxenden, Ontario, Great White North Posts: 13,307	I personally would go for the '70 it looks solid. The '59 seems to be more bang for the buck but you best look them other real good before you make a decision. If you are going to use this truck as a daily driver you may consider the '70 as it is newer. I personally couldn't drive a '59 daily even if it was only a 6 minute trip due to the risks of having something happen to it from general daily driving conditions etc. It is the "rarer" beauty of the two. Something to consider I suppose. Both seem like great trucks! __________________ Brian Smith - "Born To Lose" 1969 Chevrolet K10 LWB Fleetside - Proud Owner For 22 Yrs - 1 of 208 Built & Sold In Canada!- 283 V8/350TH/NP208, 2" All Spring Lift, 32" Good Year MT/R's. 1972 GMC K2500 Custom LWB Fleetside - Proud Owner For 3 Yrs - 1 of 571 Built & Sold In Canada! - 350 V8/SM465/NP205, 4” Rough Country Lift, 33” Interco TSL Thornbirds 2007.5 GMC Sierra SLE 2500HD 4x4 - Proud Owner For 17 Yrs- 6.6L V8 Duramax Diesel/Allison 1000, 2" Lift, 33" Mickey Thompson MTZ's. 2008 Yamaha Raptor 700r - Proud Owner For 15 Yrs - ITP Mud Lites. 2015 John Deere 1025R - Proud Owner For 8 Yrs - 24HP Diesel/H120/54D/260B/SB1154.

08-12-2004, 12:02 AM	#11
cochran63 Registered User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Oklahoma Posts: 1,057	I would go with the 59. The 265 will take the same parts as the 350 in the 70 so that really isnt an issue. __________________ Youth soon passes away, but immaturity can last a life time.

08-11-2004, 10:58 PM	#2
Slams_58 Account Suspended Join Date: May 2002 Location: I let ya know as soon as I know Posts: 3,593	59 59 59 59 59 59 But that's just My opinion!!!! I'm a little Biased!

08-11-2004, 11:01 PM	#5
super72 Registered User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: South Carolina Posts: 207	I would go with the 70

08-11-2004, 11:18 PM	#7
Longhorn Man its all about the +6 inches Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Hilliard Ohio Posts: 2,690	Daily driver? The 70 hands down. The 59 will be down for a week at a time while you wait for parts to come in.

08-11-2004, 11:22 PM	#8
Phelgm Registered User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Mebane (Central), NC Posts: 26	Its probably worth mentioning that I have a Honda Accord that I use for my appts ( I travel some from time to time) so when I say Daily driver, I mean by choice not by necessity.

08-11-2004, 11:31 PM	#10
Phelgm Registered User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Mebane (Central), NC Posts: 26	Yes yes the cool factor weighs heavily on my mind. I am leaning toward the c10 though, it looks like the 1956 265 cu." V-8 with power pack is a bit rare and may make it more difficult if I have to do some repairs.

08-12-2004, 12:22 AM	#12
Longhorn Man its all about the +6 inches Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Hilliard Ohio Posts: 2,690	cocran, actually, you'd be amazed at how many parts would NOT fit that early small block. Lots of revisions made shortly after that. I still say 70, not becouse I dislike the 59 (although, the grill does make me think of a checker cab) but the 70 will ride better, easier to work on, fairly modern in suspention and brake department (esp with a simple disc upgrade) new parts are easy to find, used parts are easy to find (wile both are almost non-existent on the 59) and the creature comeforts are either already in the 70, or added real easily. The 59 would end up being more of a custom by the time you would enjoy driving it. Besides, vacume operated windshield wipers suck. Oh, it was pretty cool seeing you in chat tonight phelgm. Your turn Shawna. (slams 68)

08-12-2004, 12:27 AM	#13
dtlilly Account Suspended Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Shadow of Lambeau Field Posts: 5,597	I have to vote for the 59, but all the points made about why to go with the 70 are definately valid.

08-12-2004, 12:34 AM	#14
krazy_texan Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Des Moines, Ia Posts: 3,233	i say the 59 because it is more rare than a 70 plus it is a fleetside, now honestly how many of those do you see around, then you could find a 67-72 model for a few hundred bucks and slowly fix it up. __________________ Krazy Texan My Trucks are made with Wrenches not Chop Sticks 1967 GMC 3/4 ton "Johnny Cash" 1990 v1500 suburban 1967 Ford f100 Swb 4x4 "green bean" GOD BLESS JESUS, JOHN WAYNE, AND THE ALAMO

08-12-2004, 05:31 AM	#15
Palf70Step State of Confusion! Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Gulfport, MS USA Posts: 47,249	I'm with Andy, the 70....But like Slam_58, I'm Biased __________________ Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!

08-12-2004, 05:45 AM	#16
jlive68 Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Greenville, Tx. Posts: 286	I will have to go with the '70 just because it is newer but the decission is your's to make. You might want to go and look at them because what you see might not be what you get. James __________________ 1968 chevy U.S. Navy



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

08-12-2004, 09:45 AM	#17
1970 CST Short Wide Senior Moment Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Pittsburg Ca Posts: 4,193	Its really a simple decision, Buy them Both __________________ 1970 CST LS 1 6 speed Ford 9 inch Detroit Tru Track, Dakota Didgital, Vintage Air, QA1 Coil Overs Front & Rear Lots of FUN 2013 GMC PU, Oldest Son 71 GMC LWB. QA1 Suspension, Angry SB. Youngest Son 2017 Toyota SUV Daughters car 2018 Traverse , Wife’s Ride Pittsburg Ca 94565

08-12-2004, 10:40 AM	#19
stickshift_or_walk Left Foot Functioning Join Date: May 2004 Location: Duncan, OK Posts: 350	A red '70 C10? Who would even be seen driving a piece of $@#! like that? Just don't check the parking lot outside. I sold the '53 for all the reasons above. Cool yes, practical, IMO, no. If you're gonna use the truck, and therefore expect it to be dependable and easily maintained, the '70 is much better equipped for that duty than the '59. ...SSOW __________________ 69 C10 (#1 son's ride) 72 C20 (Dad's farm truck) 82 K30 (Ex - brush pumper project)

08-12-2004, 10:42 AM	#21
dubie Registered User Join Date: May 2000 Location: Flin Flon, Manitoba, Canada Posts: 8,853	If it was me, I would buy the 59. You could always swap the engine out after a while to a more common SBC at minimal cost. But havig that rare V8 will only up the value of that truck as the years go on. As much as I love the 67-72 style, the 55-59 is still the nicest Chevy body style produced. Does the 59 still have the solid front axle or has it been upgraded to an IFS system? If it's solid axle, you wouldn't really want it as a daily driver. It would be like driving a lumber wagon __________________ My name's Tim and I'm a truckaholic My 56 Chevy shop truck build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=562795

08-12-2004, 01:42 PM	#23
john@thepier Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Lake Geneva, WI 53147 Posts: 970	Hi, This is John's wife and my idea is that you buy the 70 and give me the # to the person with the 59

08-12-2004, 01:48 PM	#24
dtlilly Account Suspended Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Shadow of Lambeau Field Posts: 5,597	Hey John's wife (nameless? ) Welcome to the board to ya! You might as well go ahead and sign up for your own board name, this place is the best message board on the net, and you will end up posting here daily like the rest of us

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.